“单极躁狂”与双相情感障碍的社会人口学及临床因素比较

A. S, G. Kini, A. Kakunje
{"title":"“单极躁狂”与双相情感障碍的社会人口学及临床因素比较","authors":"A. S, G. Kini, A. Kakunje","doi":"10.30834/kjp.34.2.2021.295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Bipolar Affective Disorder is defined as an affective or mood illness characterised by distinct episodes of elevated mood and sad mood. However, many patients report recurrent episodes of mania but no depressive episodes usually termed as Unipolar Mania. Our study aimed to identify Unipolar Mania among patients diagnosed with Bipolar Affective Disorder and assess any difference in the clinical and socio-demographic profile between the two groups. Material and methods: This cross-sectional observational study was conducted between April 2020 and March 2021 at the outpatient clinic of a tertiary care medical college hospital. Patients aged >18 years and diagnosed with Bipolar Affective Disorder as per ICD-10 criteria constituted the study population. Patients with a history of any medical illness that may significantly influence CNS function or structure as judged by clinical evidence were excluded. Results: A total of 52 patients were included in the present study after obtaining informed consent, 26 patients each in both groups. The mean age of patients in the Unipolar Mania (UM) group was 38.77±12.42 yrs, and Bipolar Affective Disorder (BPAD) group was 41.15±12.47yrs. The younger age of onset was noted among UM group (25.62±5.31) compared to the BPAD group (28.69±6.29). Psychotic symptoms in the first episode, suicidal attempts, comorbid anxiety disorder, substance use disorder and medical illness were more common among the BPAD group. In contrast, the seasonality was more common among UM group. There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding the number of episodes, the number of psychotic episodes, and mood-congruent psychotic episodes. The Childhood Trauma Questionnaire score was almost similar in both groups. Conclusion: There were no significant differences between the Unipolar Mania (UM) group and Bipolar Affective Disorder (BPAD) group regarding clinical and socio-demographic variables. Unipolar mania, perhaps, is not a distinct nosological disorder. Unipolar mania could be considered a course specifier similar to how rapid cycling, seasonality, and peripartum onset mood disorders are considered rather than a separate nosological entity.","PeriodicalId":31047,"journal":{"name":"Kerala Journal of Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of socio-demographic and clinical factors between “unipolar mania” and bipolar affective disorder\",\"authors\":\"A. S, G. Kini, A. Kakunje\",\"doi\":\"10.30834/kjp.34.2.2021.295\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Bipolar Affective Disorder is defined as an affective or mood illness characterised by distinct episodes of elevated mood and sad mood. However, many patients report recurrent episodes of mania but no depressive episodes usually termed as Unipolar Mania. Our study aimed to identify Unipolar Mania among patients diagnosed with Bipolar Affective Disorder and assess any difference in the clinical and socio-demographic profile between the two groups. Material and methods: This cross-sectional observational study was conducted between April 2020 and March 2021 at the outpatient clinic of a tertiary care medical college hospital. Patients aged >18 years and diagnosed with Bipolar Affective Disorder as per ICD-10 criteria constituted the study population. Patients with a history of any medical illness that may significantly influence CNS function or structure as judged by clinical evidence were excluded. Results: A total of 52 patients were included in the present study after obtaining informed consent, 26 patients each in both groups. The mean age of patients in the Unipolar Mania (UM) group was 38.77±12.42 yrs, and Bipolar Affective Disorder (BPAD) group was 41.15±12.47yrs. The younger age of onset was noted among UM group (25.62±5.31) compared to the BPAD group (28.69±6.29). Psychotic symptoms in the first episode, suicidal attempts, comorbid anxiety disorder, substance use disorder and medical illness were more common among the BPAD group. In contrast, the seasonality was more common among UM group. There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding the number of episodes, the number of psychotic episodes, and mood-congruent psychotic episodes. The Childhood Trauma Questionnaire score was almost similar in both groups. Conclusion: There were no significant differences between the Unipolar Mania (UM) group and Bipolar Affective Disorder (BPAD) group regarding clinical and socio-demographic variables. Unipolar mania, perhaps, is not a distinct nosological disorder. Unipolar mania could be considered a course specifier similar to how rapid cycling, seasonality, and peripartum onset mood disorders are considered rather than a separate nosological entity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kerala Journal of Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kerala Journal of Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30834/kjp.34.2.2021.295\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kerala Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30834/kjp.34.2.2021.295","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:双相情感障碍被定义为一种情感或情绪疾病,其特征是情绪升高和悲伤情绪的明显发作。然而,许多患者报告反复发作的躁狂,但没有抑郁发作,通常称为单极性躁狂。我们的研究旨在鉴别诊断为双相情感障碍的患者中的单极躁狂,并评估两组患者在临床和社会人口统计学方面的差异。材料和方法:本横断面观察性研究于2020年4月至2021年3月在某三级专科医院门诊进行。根据ICD-10标准诊断为双相情感障碍的年龄在bb0 - 18岁的患者构成了研究人群。排除有临床证据判断可能显著影响中枢神经系统功能或结构的任何医学病史的患者。结果:经知情同意,共纳入52例患者,两组各26例。单极躁狂(UM)组患者平均年龄38.77±12.42岁,双相情感障碍(BPAD)组患者平均年龄41.15±12.47岁。UM组的发病年龄(25.62±5.31)明显低于BPAD组(28.69±6.29)。首次发作的精神病症状、自杀企图、共病焦虑症、物质使用障碍和医学疾病在BPAD组中更为常见。相比之下,季节性在UM组中更为常见。两组在精神病发作次数、精神病发作次数和情绪一致精神病发作方面无显著差异。两组儿童创伤问卷得分几乎相似。结论:单极性躁狂症(UM)组与双相情感障碍(BPAD)组在临床和社会人口学变量上无显著差异。也许单极躁狂并不是一种独特的疾病。单极躁狂可以被认为是一种病程说明,类似于如何快速循环,季节性和围产期发作的情绪障碍,而不是一个单独的分科实体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of socio-demographic and clinical factors between “unipolar mania” and bipolar affective disorder
Background: Bipolar Affective Disorder is defined as an affective or mood illness characterised by distinct episodes of elevated mood and sad mood. However, many patients report recurrent episodes of mania but no depressive episodes usually termed as Unipolar Mania. Our study aimed to identify Unipolar Mania among patients diagnosed with Bipolar Affective Disorder and assess any difference in the clinical and socio-demographic profile between the two groups. Material and methods: This cross-sectional observational study was conducted between April 2020 and March 2021 at the outpatient clinic of a tertiary care medical college hospital. Patients aged >18 years and diagnosed with Bipolar Affective Disorder as per ICD-10 criteria constituted the study population. Patients with a history of any medical illness that may significantly influence CNS function or structure as judged by clinical evidence were excluded. Results: A total of 52 patients were included in the present study after obtaining informed consent, 26 patients each in both groups. The mean age of patients in the Unipolar Mania (UM) group was 38.77±12.42 yrs, and Bipolar Affective Disorder (BPAD) group was 41.15±12.47yrs. The younger age of onset was noted among UM group (25.62±5.31) compared to the BPAD group (28.69±6.29). Psychotic symptoms in the first episode, suicidal attempts, comorbid anxiety disorder, substance use disorder and medical illness were more common among the BPAD group. In contrast, the seasonality was more common among UM group. There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding the number of episodes, the number of psychotic episodes, and mood-congruent psychotic episodes. The Childhood Trauma Questionnaire score was almost similar in both groups. Conclusion: There were no significant differences between the Unipolar Mania (UM) group and Bipolar Affective Disorder (BPAD) group regarding clinical and socio-demographic variables. Unipolar mania, perhaps, is not a distinct nosological disorder. Unipolar mania could be considered a course specifier similar to how rapid cycling, seasonality, and peripartum onset mood disorders are considered rather than a separate nosological entity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Retraction of “Psychosomatic problems in caregivers of patients with major mental illnesses.” Letters commenting on published articles: Last but not the least Lithium memoirs Holism is central to psychiatric practice Cognitive dysfunction in male inpatients with alcohol dependence: A comparative cross-sectional study from South India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1