Shining light on the dark side of action research: Power, relationality and transformation

An important aim of the Action Research Journal is encouraging people to get involved in action research in order to promote transformative change across the globe. The journal subscribes to a relational manifesto in which “action researchers are called to contribute to conversations-for-change about ways of knowing, doing and being that invite us to develop shared learning platforms, alongside people with a stake in transforming structural forces that inhibit thriving” (Bradbury et al., 2019, p. 9). An important strategy in this respect is to raise awareness of the ‘bright side’ of action research for transformations (ART): explain how it can be done, showcase what has been and can be achieved, and argue that it is a vital and urgent response to the world’s sustainability crises. ART has much to show for itself and needs to continue its efforts at spreading the word and inviting ever-more people in joining the conversation and connecting their experiences and achievements. However, we also know that ART has a ‘dark side’. It is a complex and demanding process. It demands relational, conceptual and experimental skills not usually taught together in conventional educational programs. Many challenges are likely to emerge and there are no guarantees that it will achieve the desired impact. Transformative aspirations and change processes inevitably come with ambiguities, mistakes, frustrations, tensions, conflicts and disappointments. All action researchers struggle with feelings of failure and doubt about the value and impact of their work.