{"title":"建构主义视野下的中国关联比较建构发展研究","authors":"Fangqiong Zhan, E. Traugott","doi":"10.1075/dia.18025.zha","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The paper addresses the emergence and development of the Chinese correlative comparative construction (CrCC) from the perspective of constructionalization. Most previous historical studies of the CrCC take a grammaticalization approach (e.g., Long 2013), focusing mainly on morphosyntax alone rather than investigating syntax and semantics in an integrated way. However, the architecture of construction grammar requires approaching linguistic analysis with both form and meaning equally in mind. This approach suggests that what have sometimes been considered to be merely different formal expressions of the CrCC are in fact two different constructions, one correlative, and the other a simple incremental. We identify the critical contexts (see Diewald & Smirnova 2010) that by hypothesis enabled the constructionalization of the CrCC, and point to the importance of considering network reorganization and multiple sources in the development of the simple incremental construction (see e.g., Boas 2008; Van de Velde et al. 2013).","PeriodicalId":44637,"journal":{"name":"Diachronica","volume":"37 1","pages":"83-126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A study of the development of the Chinese correlative comparative construction from the perspective of\\n constructionalization\",\"authors\":\"Fangqiong Zhan, E. Traugott\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/dia.18025.zha\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The paper addresses the emergence and development of the Chinese correlative comparative construction (CrCC) from the perspective of constructionalization. Most previous historical studies of the CrCC take a grammaticalization approach (e.g., Long 2013), focusing mainly on morphosyntax alone rather than investigating syntax and semantics in an integrated way. However, the architecture of construction grammar requires approaching linguistic analysis with both form and meaning equally in mind. This approach suggests that what have sometimes been considered to be merely different formal expressions of the CrCC are in fact two different constructions, one correlative, and the other a simple incremental. We identify the critical contexts (see Diewald & Smirnova 2010) that by hypothesis enabled the constructionalization of the CrCC, and point to the importance of considering network reorganization and multiple sources in the development of the simple incremental construction (see e.g., Boas 2008; Van de Velde et al. 2013).\",\"PeriodicalId\":44637,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diachronica\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"83-126\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diachronica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.18025.zha\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diachronica","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.18025.zha","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
摘要
本文从建构主义的角度论述了中国关联比较建构的产生和发展。以往对CrCC的大多数历史研究都采取了语法化的方法(例如,Long 2013),主要关注形态语法,而不是综合研究语法和语义。然而,建构语法的架构要求在进行语言分析时,要同时考虑形式和意义。这种方法表明,有时被认为只是CrCC的不同形式表达,实际上是两种不同的结构,一种是相关的,另一种是简单的增量。我们确定了关键背景(见Diewald&Smirnova,2010年),这些背景通过假设实现了CrCC的构建,并指出了在开发简单的增量构建中考虑网络重组和多个来源的重要性(例如,见Boas 2008;Van de Velde等人2013)。
A study of the development of the Chinese correlative comparative construction from the perspective of
constructionalization
Abstract The paper addresses the emergence and development of the Chinese correlative comparative construction (CrCC) from the perspective of constructionalization. Most previous historical studies of the CrCC take a grammaticalization approach (e.g., Long 2013), focusing mainly on morphosyntax alone rather than investigating syntax and semantics in an integrated way. However, the architecture of construction grammar requires approaching linguistic analysis with both form and meaning equally in mind. This approach suggests that what have sometimes been considered to be merely different formal expressions of the CrCC are in fact two different constructions, one correlative, and the other a simple incremental. We identify the critical contexts (see Diewald & Smirnova 2010) that by hypothesis enabled the constructionalization of the CrCC, and point to the importance of considering network reorganization and multiple sources in the development of the simple incremental construction (see e.g., Boas 2008; Van de Velde et al. 2013).
期刊介绍:
Diachronica provides a forum for the presentation and discussion of information concerning all aspects of language change in any and all languages of the globe. Contributions which combine theoretical interest and philological acumen are especially welcome. Diachronica appears three times per year, publishing articles, review articles, book reviews, and a miscellanea section including notes, reports and discussions.