参与式行动研究中的民族志参与:见证大学生活动家的发展转变

IF 1.6 4区 管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT Action Research Pub Date : 2022-12-11 DOI:10.1177/14767503221145347
Mai N. Vang, M. Wolfgram, Bailey B. Smolarek, L. Lee, Payeng Moua, Ariana Thao, Odyssey Xiong, P. Xiong, Ying Xiong, Lisa Yang
{"title":"参与式行动研究中的民族志参与:见证大学生活动家的发展转变","authors":"Mai N. Vang, M. Wolfgram, Bailey B. Smolarek, L. Lee, Payeng Moua, Ariana Thao, Odyssey Xiong, P. Xiong, Ying Xiong, Lisa Yang","doi":"10.1177/14767503221145347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article documents and analyzes autoethnographic engagement in participatory action research (PAR)—a reflective, irritative, and dialogic writing and team-discussion process which documents researcher-activist experiences and contextualizes them within the action research process. We document autoethnography as implemented in a research partnership between HMoob American college student activists and education researchers, to study the systems of oppression and inform advocacy to support HMoob American students at a predominantly white university. Autoethnography informs all aspects of the PAR project, from the development of research questions, to data collection, analysis, and writing, to the implementation of plans for action. We provide evidence from selections of the team’s autoethnographic journals, of the role of autoethnographic engagement as a PAR research technique that can facilitate and bear witness to the developmental transformations for emerging PAR activists—specifically, the cultivation of critical consciousness, the critical re-framing of issues of cultural-community identity, and the formation of an identity as a researcher-activist. We argue that autoethnography provides a practical technique for PAR teams for engaging in iterative cycles of critical self-reflective praxis (Freire, 2011), facilitating the development of critically-engaged researchers and the formation of analyses that are epistemologically grounded and action-oriented, addressing issues of power asymmetries within research.","PeriodicalId":46969,"journal":{"name":"Action Research","volume":"21 1","pages":"104 - 123"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Autoethnographic engagement in participatory action research: Bearing witness to developmental transformations for college student activists\",\"authors\":\"Mai N. Vang, M. Wolfgram, Bailey B. Smolarek, L. Lee, Payeng Moua, Ariana Thao, Odyssey Xiong, P. Xiong, Ying Xiong, Lisa Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14767503221145347\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article documents and analyzes autoethnographic engagement in participatory action research (PAR)—a reflective, irritative, and dialogic writing and team-discussion process which documents researcher-activist experiences and contextualizes them within the action research process. We document autoethnography as implemented in a research partnership between HMoob American college student activists and education researchers, to study the systems of oppression and inform advocacy to support HMoob American students at a predominantly white university. Autoethnography informs all aspects of the PAR project, from the development of research questions, to data collection, analysis, and writing, to the implementation of plans for action. We provide evidence from selections of the team’s autoethnographic journals, of the role of autoethnographic engagement as a PAR research technique that can facilitate and bear witness to the developmental transformations for emerging PAR activists—specifically, the cultivation of critical consciousness, the critical re-framing of issues of cultural-community identity, and the formation of an identity as a researcher-activist. We argue that autoethnography provides a practical technique for PAR teams for engaging in iterative cycles of critical self-reflective praxis (Freire, 2011), facilitating the development of critically-engaged researchers and the formation of analyses that are epistemologically grounded and action-oriented, addressing issues of power asymmetries within research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46969,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Action Research\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"104 - 123\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Action Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14767503221145347\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Action Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14767503221145347","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文记录并分析了参与式行动研究(PAR)中的自我民族志参与-一种反思,刺激和对话的写作和团队讨论过程,该过程记录了研究者-活动家的经验并将其置于行动研究过程中。我们记录了在HMoob美国大学生活动家和教育研究人员之间的研究合作伙伴关系中实施的自我民族志,以研究压迫系统并告知倡导以支持HMoob美国学生在以白人为主的大学。从研究问题的发展,到数据收集、分析、写作,再到行动计划的实施,自我民族志贯穿了PAR项目的各个方面。我们从团队的民族志期刊中选择了一些证据,证明了民族志参与作为一种PAR研究技术的作用,可以促进和见证新兴的PAR活动家的发展转变,特别是培养批判意识,对文化社区身份问题的批判性重新构建,以及作为研究-活动家的身份的形成。我们认为,自我民族志为PAR团队提供了一种实用的技术,用于参与批判性自我反思实践的迭代循环(Freire, 2011),促进了批判性参与研究人员的发展,并形成了以认识论为基础和以行动为导向的分析,解决了研究中的权力不对称问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Autoethnographic engagement in participatory action research: Bearing witness to developmental transformations for college student activists
This article documents and analyzes autoethnographic engagement in participatory action research (PAR)—a reflective, irritative, and dialogic writing and team-discussion process which documents researcher-activist experiences and contextualizes them within the action research process. We document autoethnography as implemented in a research partnership between HMoob American college student activists and education researchers, to study the systems of oppression and inform advocacy to support HMoob American students at a predominantly white university. Autoethnography informs all aspects of the PAR project, from the development of research questions, to data collection, analysis, and writing, to the implementation of plans for action. We provide evidence from selections of the team’s autoethnographic journals, of the role of autoethnographic engagement as a PAR research technique that can facilitate and bear witness to the developmental transformations for emerging PAR activists—specifically, the cultivation of critical consciousness, the critical re-framing of issues of cultural-community identity, and the formation of an identity as a researcher-activist. We argue that autoethnography provides a practical technique for PAR teams for engaging in iterative cycles of critical self-reflective praxis (Freire, 2011), facilitating the development of critically-engaged researchers and the formation of analyses that are epistemologically grounded and action-oriented, addressing issues of power asymmetries within research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Action Research
Action Research Multiple-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
10.50%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: Action Research is a new international, interdisciplinary, refereed journal which is a forum for the development of the theory and practice of action research. Our purpose with this international, peer reviewed journal is to offer a forum for participative, action oriented inquiry into questions that matter--questions relevant to people in the conduct of their lives, that enable them to flourish in their organizations and communities, and that evince a deep concern for the wider ecology. The aim of the journal is to offer a viable alternative to dominant "disinterested" models of social science, one that is relevant to people in the conduct of their lives, their organizations and their communities.
期刊最新文献
Participatory action research: A tool to develop occupational health and safety education for new immigrant workers Benefits of reflection-based monitoring in action research projects Towards right to work: A reflexive analysis on an action research Revisiting an historic tool of participatory action research: Consciousness-raising as a methodology for transformative change How to (mis)align participatory approaches with the everyday life? Construction of an improved cookstove in India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1