弗兰卡·拉梅获诺贝尔文学奖:以合作的方式看傅和弗兰卡·拉梅之作

IF 0.3 3区 文学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Italian Studies Pub Date : 2022-06-24 DOI:10.1080/00751634.2022.2081783
M. Angelucci, S. Kolsky
{"title":"弗兰卡·拉梅获诺贝尔文学奖:以合作的方式看傅和弗兰卡·拉梅之作","authors":"M. Angelucci, S. Kolsky","doi":"10.1080/00751634.2022.2081783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this article, we seek to modify the view that Fo is the driving force behind the theatrical production of the various incarnations of the Compagnia Fo–Rame. We review certain theoretical aspects of authorship, emphasising it as an intrinsically collaborative process. In particular, we want to move away from the dichotomy that sees Fo as the solitary writer-actor-genius, and Rame as the ancillary manager and editor of ‘his’ works. Not only is the reality far more complex, but those roles are in fact creative authorial functions inside a collaborative practice. Why has this not been done before? In part because of a cultural practice that puts the individual (male) and his ‘genius’ at the centre, and in part because of a strong narrative put forward by Fo and Rame themselves, never truly questioned by scholars; as a consequence, Rame’s contribution has been either side-lined, or reclaimed in problematic ways.","PeriodicalId":44221,"journal":{"name":"Italian Studies","volume":"77 1","pages":"341 - 353"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Franca Rame Won the Nobel Prize: Approaching the Works of Dario Fo and Franca Rame as Collaboration\",\"authors\":\"M. Angelucci, S. Kolsky\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00751634.2022.2081783\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In this article, we seek to modify the view that Fo is the driving force behind the theatrical production of the various incarnations of the Compagnia Fo–Rame. We review certain theoretical aspects of authorship, emphasising it as an intrinsically collaborative process. In particular, we want to move away from the dichotomy that sees Fo as the solitary writer-actor-genius, and Rame as the ancillary manager and editor of ‘his’ works. Not only is the reality far more complex, but those roles are in fact creative authorial functions inside a collaborative practice. Why has this not been done before? In part because of a cultural practice that puts the individual (male) and his ‘genius’ at the centre, and in part because of a strong narrative put forward by Fo and Rame themselves, never truly questioned by scholars; as a consequence, Rame’s contribution has been either side-lined, or reclaimed in problematic ways.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44221,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Italian Studies\",\"volume\":\"77 1\",\"pages\":\"341 - 353\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Italian Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00751634.2022.2081783\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Italian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00751634.2022.2081783","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要在这篇文章中,我们试图改变这样一种观点,即佛是各种化身佛的戏剧制作背后的驱动力。我们回顾了作者身份的某些理论方面,强调这是一个本质上的合作过程。特别是,我们希望摆脱将傅视为孤独的作家和演员天才,将拉姆视为“他”作品的辅助管理者和编辑的二分法。不仅现实要复杂得多,而且这些角色实际上是合作实践中创造性的作者功能。为什么以前没有这样做过?部分原因是文化实践将个人(男性)和他的“天才”置于中心,部分原因是傅和拉姆自己提出的强有力的叙事,从未真正受到学者的质疑;因此,拉姆的贡献要么被搁置一边,要么以有问题的方式被收回。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Franca Rame Won the Nobel Prize: Approaching the Works of Dario Fo and Franca Rame as Collaboration
ABSTRACT In this article, we seek to modify the view that Fo is the driving force behind the theatrical production of the various incarnations of the Compagnia Fo–Rame. We review certain theoretical aspects of authorship, emphasising it as an intrinsically collaborative process. In particular, we want to move away from the dichotomy that sees Fo as the solitary writer-actor-genius, and Rame as the ancillary manager and editor of ‘his’ works. Not only is the reality far more complex, but those roles are in fact creative authorial functions inside a collaborative practice. Why has this not been done before? In part because of a cultural practice that puts the individual (male) and his ‘genius’ at the centre, and in part because of a strong narrative put forward by Fo and Rame themselves, never truly questioned by scholars; as a consequence, Rame’s contribution has been either side-lined, or reclaimed in problematic ways.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Italian Studies
Italian Studies Multiple-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: Italian Studies has a national and international reputation for academic and scholarly excellence, publishing original articles (in Italian or English) on a wide range of Italian cultural concerns from the Middle Ages to the contemporary era. The journal warmly welcomes submissions covering a range of disciplines and inter-disciplinary subjects from scholarly and critical work on Italy"s literary culture and linguistics to Italian history and politics, film and art history, and gender and cultural studies. It publishes two issues per year, normally including one special themed issue and occasional interviews with leading scholars.The reviews section in the journal includes articles and short reviews on a broad spectrum of recent works of scholarship.
期刊最新文献
From Mater Dolorosa to Mater Degenerata: Sacrifice and Subversion in Deledda’s Cenere and Duse’s Film Infinite or Indefinite? Leopardi’s Infinite through the Lens of Fyodor Dostoevsky Un diavolo imitato: Edoardo Perino editore di Mario Rapisardi Jewish Women in the Early Italian Women’s Movement, 1861–1945. Biographies, Discourses, and Transnational Networks Dante’s Multitudes: History, Philosophy, Method
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1