外阴癌放疗后治疗结果的队列研究

IF 0.1 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Southern African Journal of Gynaecological Oncology Pub Date : 2020-07-02 DOI:10.1080/20742835.2020.1855748
T. Goba-Mjwara, H. Simonds
{"title":"外阴癌放疗后治疗结果的队列研究","authors":"T. Goba-Mjwara, H. Simonds","doi":"10.1080/20742835.2020.1855748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Carcinoma of the vulva is an uncommon tumour. For locally advanced vulval cancer with proximity to the urethra or anal margin, surgery often involves exenteration with colostomy or urinary diversion, which results in significant physical and psychological morbidity. The use of neoadjuvant or primary chemoradiation is an acceptable treatment option for those patients deemed unsuitable for primary surgery in advance. In addition, if the patient has poor locoregional control this has a significant impact on quality of life following treatment. This study aimed to evaluate radiotherapy curative and palliative treatment outcomes for patients in a single institution. Methods A quantitative retrospective cohort analysis of all women diagnosed with vulval cancer managed in a single institution was undertaken. Eligible patients included patients with vulval carcinoma referred for radiotherapy (RT)—primary, adjuvant and palliative. Demographic and clinical data, treatment time and radiotherapy fractionation were noted. The primary end-points were local control (LC) and overall survival (OS). Results Forty-two patients were referred during the study period. Among the 33 evaluable patients, all patients completed treatment. At 12 months’ follow-up, 20 women were alive (4 with evidence of recurrent/persistent disease) and 13 had died (4 with documented recurrent disease). At the time of data analysis, 22 patients received curative treatment: definitive chemoradiation or radiation alone (n = 17) or adjuvant RT (n = 5). Of the 22 patients, 11 were in remission, 8 had been lost to follow-up, and 3 had documented local recurrence. In total, 11 patients received palliative treatment. The overall survival at 12 months for the patients who received primary surgery followed by adjuvant radiotherapy was 100%. There was, however, no significant difference between the survival for the definitive CRT/RT (57.5%) and the high-dose palliative RT (49.1%) groups. However, the dose of radiotherapy was significant; women who received a total dose of radiotherapy greater than 60 Gy had improved local control compared with those who received a total dose of less than 45 Gy. Conclusion Surgery followed by adjuvant treatment had a superior overall survival outcome compared with definitive chemoradiation or radiotherapy alone in this small cohort, reflecting poorer outcomes for advanced disease.","PeriodicalId":41638,"journal":{"name":"Southern African Journal of Gynaecological Oncology","volume":"12 1","pages":"27 - 31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20742835.2020.1855748","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A cohort study of treatment outcomes after radiotherapy in vulva carcinoma patients\",\"authors\":\"T. Goba-Mjwara, H. Simonds\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20742835.2020.1855748\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Carcinoma of the vulva is an uncommon tumour. For locally advanced vulval cancer with proximity to the urethra or anal margin, surgery often involves exenteration with colostomy or urinary diversion, which results in significant physical and psychological morbidity. The use of neoadjuvant or primary chemoradiation is an acceptable treatment option for those patients deemed unsuitable for primary surgery in advance. In addition, if the patient has poor locoregional control this has a significant impact on quality of life following treatment. This study aimed to evaluate radiotherapy curative and palliative treatment outcomes for patients in a single institution. Methods A quantitative retrospective cohort analysis of all women diagnosed with vulval cancer managed in a single institution was undertaken. Eligible patients included patients with vulval carcinoma referred for radiotherapy (RT)—primary, adjuvant and palliative. Demographic and clinical data, treatment time and radiotherapy fractionation were noted. The primary end-points were local control (LC) and overall survival (OS). Results Forty-two patients were referred during the study period. Among the 33 evaluable patients, all patients completed treatment. At 12 months’ follow-up, 20 women were alive (4 with evidence of recurrent/persistent disease) and 13 had died (4 with documented recurrent disease). At the time of data analysis, 22 patients received curative treatment: definitive chemoradiation or radiation alone (n = 17) or adjuvant RT (n = 5). Of the 22 patients, 11 were in remission, 8 had been lost to follow-up, and 3 had documented local recurrence. In total, 11 patients received palliative treatment. The overall survival at 12 months for the patients who received primary surgery followed by adjuvant radiotherapy was 100%. There was, however, no significant difference between the survival for the definitive CRT/RT (57.5%) and the high-dose palliative RT (49.1%) groups. However, the dose of radiotherapy was significant; women who received a total dose of radiotherapy greater than 60 Gy had improved local control compared with those who received a total dose of less than 45 Gy. Conclusion Surgery followed by adjuvant treatment had a superior overall survival outcome compared with definitive chemoradiation or radiotherapy alone in this small cohort, reflecting poorer outcomes for advanced disease.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41638,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Southern African Journal of Gynaecological Oncology\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"27 - 31\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20742835.2020.1855748\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Southern African Journal of Gynaecological Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20742835.2020.1855748\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern African Journal of Gynaecological Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20742835.2020.1855748","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:外阴癌是一种罕见的肿瘤。对于靠近尿道或肛门缘的局部晚期外阴癌,手术通常包括切除并结肠造口或尿改道,这会导致严重的生理和心理并发症。对于那些预先认为不适合进行原发性手术的患者,使用新辅助或原发性放化疗是一种可接受的治疗选择。此外,如果患者局部控制不良,这对治疗后的生活质量有重大影响。本研究旨在评估单一机构患者的放疗疗效和姑息治疗结果。方法对在同一医院诊断为外阴癌的所有女性患者进行定量回顾性队列分析。符合条件的患者包括接受放射治疗(RT)的外阴癌患者-原发性,辅助和姑息性。记录患者的人口学和临床资料、治疗时间和放疗间隔。主要终点为局部控制(LC)和总生存期(OS)。结果42例患者在研究期间转诊。在33例可评估患者中,所有患者均完成治疗。在12个月的随访中,20名妇女存活(4名有复发/持续性疾病的证据),13名死亡(4名有复发性疾病的记录)。在数据分析时,22例患者接受了根治性治疗:明确放化疗或单独放化疗(n = 17)或辅助放疗(n = 5)。在22例患者中,11例缓解,8例失去随访,3例有局部复发记录。共有11例患者接受了姑息治疗。接受初次手术后辅助放疗的患者12个月总生存率为100%。然而,最终CRT/RT组(57.5%)和高剂量姑息性RT组(49.1%)的生存率无显著差异。然而,放疗剂量是显著的;接受放射治疗总剂量大于60戈瑞的妇女与接受放射治疗总剂量小于45戈瑞的妇女相比,局部控制得到改善。结论:在这个小队列中,与单纯放化疗或放疗相比,手术后辅助治疗的总生存期更好,反映了晚期疾病的预后更差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A cohort study of treatment outcomes after radiotherapy in vulva carcinoma patients
Background Carcinoma of the vulva is an uncommon tumour. For locally advanced vulval cancer with proximity to the urethra or anal margin, surgery often involves exenteration with colostomy or urinary diversion, which results in significant physical and psychological morbidity. The use of neoadjuvant or primary chemoradiation is an acceptable treatment option for those patients deemed unsuitable for primary surgery in advance. In addition, if the patient has poor locoregional control this has a significant impact on quality of life following treatment. This study aimed to evaluate radiotherapy curative and palliative treatment outcomes for patients in a single institution. Methods A quantitative retrospective cohort analysis of all women diagnosed with vulval cancer managed in a single institution was undertaken. Eligible patients included patients with vulval carcinoma referred for radiotherapy (RT)—primary, adjuvant and palliative. Demographic and clinical data, treatment time and radiotherapy fractionation were noted. The primary end-points were local control (LC) and overall survival (OS). Results Forty-two patients were referred during the study period. Among the 33 evaluable patients, all patients completed treatment. At 12 months’ follow-up, 20 women were alive (4 with evidence of recurrent/persistent disease) and 13 had died (4 with documented recurrent disease). At the time of data analysis, 22 patients received curative treatment: definitive chemoradiation or radiation alone (n = 17) or adjuvant RT (n = 5). Of the 22 patients, 11 were in remission, 8 had been lost to follow-up, and 3 had documented local recurrence. In total, 11 patients received palliative treatment. The overall survival at 12 months for the patients who received primary surgery followed by adjuvant radiotherapy was 100%. There was, however, no significant difference between the survival for the definitive CRT/RT (57.5%) and the high-dose palliative RT (49.1%) groups. However, the dose of radiotherapy was significant; women who received a total dose of radiotherapy greater than 60 Gy had improved local control compared with those who received a total dose of less than 45 Gy. Conclusion Surgery followed by adjuvant treatment had a superior overall survival outcome compared with definitive chemoradiation or radiotherapy alone in this small cohort, reflecting poorer outcomes for advanced disease.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Retrospective review of 37.4 Gy in 11 fractions for the palliation of advanced cervical cancer Challenges managing women with suspected Lynch Syndrome in Zimbabwe: a case report A retrospective study comparing the efficiency of recurrent LSIL cytology to high-grade cytology as predictors of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or worse (CIN2+) A retrospective study of the epidemiology and histological subtypes of ovarian epithelial neoplasms at Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital Laparoscopic inguinal lymph node dissection in carcinoma of the vulva: experience and intermediate results at one institution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1