语言障碍背景下的重返工作岗位:魁北克省和安大略省工人补偿政策与实践比较

Q4 Social Sciences PISTES Pub Date : 2021-04-14 DOI:10.4000/PISTES.7144
S. Premji, M. Begum, A. Medley, E. MacEachen, D. Côté, R. Saunders
{"title":"语言障碍背景下的重返工作岗位:魁北克省和安大略省工人补偿政策与实践比较","authors":"S. Premji, M. Begum, A. Medley, E. MacEachen, D. Côté, R. Saunders","doi":"10.4000/PISTES.7144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The question of how workers’ compensation systems should account for language barriers is of increasing importance given Canada’s growing linguistic diversity. This study is the first to empirically examine, based on interviews with injured workers and key informants, return-to-work policies and practices through the lens of language barriers. By comparing two jurisdictions, Quebec and Ontario, the study highlights similarities and differences in language accommodation and return-to-work policies and practices that shape the experiences of injured workers with language needs. It argues that gaps in this regard, which are more pronounced in Quebec, contribute to poor return-to-work outcomes for these workers in both provinces.","PeriodicalId":36652,"journal":{"name":"PISTES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Return-to-Work in a Language Barrier Context : Comparing Quebec’s and Ontario’s Workers’ Compensation Policies and Practices\",\"authors\":\"S. Premji, M. Begum, A. Medley, E. MacEachen, D. Côté, R. Saunders\",\"doi\":\"10.4000/PISTES.7144\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The question of how workers’ compensation systems should account for language barriers is of increasing importance given Canada’s growing linguistic diversity. This study is the first to empirically examine, based on interviews with injured workers and key informants, return-to-work policies and practices through the lens of language barriers. By comparing two jurisdictions, Quebec and Ontario, the study highlights similarities and differences in language accommodation and return-to-work policies and practices that shape the experiences of injured workers with language needs. It argues that gaps in this regard, which are more pronounced in Quebec, contribute to poor return-to-work outcomes for these workers in both provinces.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36652,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PISTES\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PISTES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4000/PISTES.7144\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PISTES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4000/PISTES.7144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

鉴于加拿大日益增长的语言多样性,工人补偿制度应如何解释语言障碍的问题越来越重要。这项研究首次通过语言障碍的视角,基于对受伤工人和关键线人的采访,对重返工作岗位的政策和做法进行了实证检验。通过比较魁北克省和安大略省这两个司法管辖区,该研究强调了语言适应和重返工作岗位政策和做法的异同,这些政策和做法塑造了有语言需求的受伤工人的经历。它认为,这方面的差距在魁北克更为明显,导致这两个省的这些工人的复工结果不佳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Return-to-Work in a Language Barrier Context : Comparing Quebec’s and Ontario’s Workers’ Compensation Policies and Practices
The question of how workers’ compensation systems should account for language barriers is of increasing importance given Canada’s growing linguistic diversity. This study is the first to empirically examine, based on interviews with injured workers and key informants, return-to-work policies and practices through the lens of language barriers. By comparing two jurisdictions, Quebec and Ontario, the study highlights similarities and differences in language accommodation and return-to-work policies and practices that shape the experiences of injured workers with language needs. It argues that gaps in this regard, which are more pronounced in Quebec, contribute to poor return-to-work outcomes for these workers in both provinces.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PISTES
PISTES Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊最新文献
Contextualiser pour faciliter l’accès au sens : focus sur l’enseignement du lexique en FLM, FLS et FLE ALECTOR : aide à la lecture pour les enfants dyslexiques et faibles lecteurs Expressions référentielles et formes prosodiques : quand et comment la prise en compte de notre interlocuteur guide‑t‑elle nos choix linguistiques ? Périphéries gauche et droite VAPVISIO
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1