奇切林和索洛维约夫的法律哲学理解中的法律、道德和人格——论俄罗斯自由主义的哲学基础

IF 0.1 4区 哲学 Q4 Arts and Humanities RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2022-03-04 DOI:10.1080/10611967.2022.2085482
S. L. Chizhkov
{"title":"奇切林和索洛维约夫的法律哲学理解中的法律、道德和人格——论俄罗斯自由主义的哲学基础","authors":"S. L. Chizhkov","doi":"10.1080/10611967.2022.2085482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The polemics between Boris Chicherin and Vladimir Solovyov are perhaps the most remarkable event in the intellectual history of Russian liberalism. These polemics elicited keen interest in the whole of society, not just among liberal circles. The arguments between the two thinkers occurred during the period when Russian liberalism was ascendant while at the same time transforming into social liberalism. The doctrinal basis of liberalism was stretched to the limit and began to lose its identity as a result. The arguments between the two thinkers reflected these circumstances to some extent. They were conducted on a very wide range of topics, including morality and its nature, personhood and its freedom and connection with society, law and the state, and the meaning of historical development. This article analyzes Solovyov’s notion of personal–social reality and his understanding of law as the bare minimum of ethics. The author approaches to Chicherin in terms of his ideas about the nature of personhood and its place in legal theory, as well as his doctrine of the relationship between law and morality, which he developed within his understanding of autonomous ethics.","PeriodicalId":42094,"journal":{"name":"RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY","volume":"60 1","pages":"126 - 139"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Law, Morality, and Personhood in the Philosophical–Legal Understandings of Boris Chicherin and Vladimir Solovyov: On the Philosophical Foundations of Russian Liberalism\",\"authors\":\"S. L. Chizhkov\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10611967.2022.2085482\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The polemics between Boris Chicherin and Vladimir Solovyov are perhaps the most remarkable event in the intellectual history of Russian liberalism. These polemics elicited keen interest in the whole of society, not just among liberal circles. The arguments between the two thinkers occurred during the period when Russian liberalism was ascendant while at the same time transforming into social liberalism. The doctrinal basis of liberalism was stretched to the limit and began to lose its identity as a result. The arguments between the two thinkers reflected these circumstances to some extent. They were conducted on a very wide range of topics, including morality and its nature, personhood and its freedom and connection with society, law and the state, and the meaning of historical development. This article analyzes Solovyov’s notion of personal–social reality and his understanding of law as the bare minimum of ethics. The author approaches to Chicherin in terms of his ideas about the nature of personhood and its place in legal theory, as well as his doctrine of the relationship between law and morality, which he developed within his understanding of autonomous ethics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42094,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"126 - 139\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611967.2022.2085482\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611967.2022.2085482","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要鲍里斯·奇切林和弗拉基米尔·索洛维约夫之间的论战可能是俄罗斯自由主义思想史上最引人注目的事件。这些争论引起了整个社会的强烈兴趣,而不仅仅是自由派圈子。两位思想家的争论发生在俄罗斯自由主义方兴未艾,同时又向社会自由主义转型的时期。自由主义的教义基础已经到了极限,并因此开始失去其身份。两位思想家之间的争论在某种程度上反映了这些情况。他们讨论的主题非常广泛,包括道德及其性质、人格及其自由以及与社会、法律和国家的联系,以及历史发展的意义。本文分析了索洛维约夫的个人-社会现实观以及他对法律作为道德最低限度的理解。作者从其关于人格本质及其在法律理论中的地位的观点,以及他在对自主伦理的理解中发展起来的关于法律与道德关系的学说,来探讨奇切林。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Law, Morality, and Personhood in the Philosophical–Legal Understandings of Boris Chicherin and Vladimir Solovyov: On the Philosophical Foundations of Russian Liberalism
ABSTRACT The polemics between Boris Chicherin and Vladimir Solovyov are perhaps the most remarkable event in the intellectual history of Russian liberalism. These polemics elicited keen interest in the whole of society, not just among liberal circles. The arguments between the two thinkers occurred during the period when Russian liberalism was ascendant while at the same time transforming into social liberalism. The doctrinal basis of liberalism was stretched to the limit and began to lose its identity as a result. The arguments between the two thinkers reflected these circumstances to some extent. They were conducted on a very wide range of topics, including morality and its nature, personhood and its freedom and connection with society, law and the state, and the meaning of historical development. This article analyzes Solovyov’s notion of personal–social reality and his understanding of law as the bare minimum of ethics. The author approaches to Chicherin in terms of his ideas about the nature of personhood and its place in legal theory, as well as his doctrine of the relationship between law and morality, which he developed within his understanding of autonomous ethics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Russian Studies in Philosophy publishes thematic issues featuring selected scholarly papers from conferences and joint research projects as well as from the leading Russian-language journals in philosophy. Thematic coverage ranges over significant theoretical topics as well as topics in the history of philosophy, both European and Russian, including issues focused on institutions, schools, and figures such as Bakhtin, Fedorov, Leontev, Losev, Rozanov, Solovev, and Zinovev.
期刊最新文献
Concluding Russian Studies in Philosophy: An Eye Towards the Future The Concept of Perfection in Lev Karsavin’s Religious Metaphysics Variants of Images of the Future in the Work of Lev P. Karsavin Lev Karsavin: Russian Religiosity and Russian Revolution The Metaphysical Path: Lev P. Karsavin’s Philosophical Experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1