{"title":"奇切林和索洛维约夫的法律哲学理解中的法律、道德和人格——论俄罗斯自由主义的哲学基础","authors":"S. L. Chizhkov","doi":"10.1080/10611967.2022.2085482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The polemics between Boris Chicherin and Vladimir Solovyov are perhaps the most remarkable event in the intellectual history of Russian liberalism. These polemics elicited keen interest in the whole of society, not just among liberal circles. The arguments between the two thinkers occurred during the period when Russian liberalism was ascendant while at the same time transforming into social liberalism. The doctrinal basis of liberalism was stretched to the limit and began to lose its identity as a result. The arguments between the two thinkers reflected these circumstances to some extent. They were conducted on a very wide range of topics, including morality and its nature, personhood and its freedom and connection with society, law and the state, and the meaning of historical development. This article analyzes Solovyov’s notion of personal–social reality and his understanding of law as the bare minimum of ethics. The author approaches to Chicherin in terms of his ideas about the nature of personhood and its place in legal theory, as well as his doctrine of the relationship between law and morality, which he developed within his understanding of autonomous ethics.","PeriodicalId":42094,"journal":{"name":"RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY","volume":"60 1","pages":"126 - 139"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Law, Morality, and Personhood in the Philosophical–Legal Understandings of Boris Chicherin and Vladimir Solovyov: On the Philosophical Foundations of Russian Liberalism\",\"authors\":\"S. L. Chizhkov\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10611967.2022.2085482\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The polemics between Boris Chicherin and Vladimir Solovyov are perhaps the most remarkable event in the intellectual history of Russian liberalism. These polemics elicited keen interest in the whole of society, not just among liberal circles. The arguments between the two thinkers occurred during the period when Russian liberalism was ascendant while at the same time transforming into social liberalism. The doctrinal basis of liberalism was stretched to the limit and began to lose its identity as a result. The arguments between the two thinkers reflected these circumstances to some extent. They were conducted on a very wide range of topics, including morality and its nature, personhood and its freedom and connection with society, law and the state, and the meaning of historical development. This article analyzes Solovyov’s notion of personal–social reality and his understanding of law as the bare minimum of ethics. The author approaches to Chicherin in terms of his ideas about the nature of personhood and its place in legal theory, as well as his doctrine of the relationship between law and morality, which he developed within his understanding of autonomous ethics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42094,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"126 - 139\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611967.2022.2085482\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611967.2022.2085482","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
Law, Morality, and Personhood in the Philosophical–Legal Understandings of Boris Chicherin and Vladimir Solovyov: On the Philosophical Foundations of Russian Liberalism
ABSTRACT The polemics between Boris Chicherin and Vladimir Solovyov are perhaps the most remarkable event in the intellectual history of Russian liberalism. These polemics elicited keen interest in the whole of society, not just among liberal circles. The arguments between the two thinkers occurred during the period when Russian liberalism was ascendant while at the same time transforming into social liberalism. The doctrinal basis of liberalism was stretched to the limit and began to lose its identity as a result. The arguments between the two thinkers reflected these circumstances to some extent. They were conducted on a very wide range of topics, including morality and its nature, personhood and its freedom and connection with society, law and the state, and the meaning of historical development. This article analyzes Solovyov’s notion of personal–social reality and his understanding of law as the bare minimum of ethics. The author approaches to Chicherin in terms of his ideas about the nature of personhood and its place in legal theory, as well as his doctrine of the relationship between law and morality, which he developed within his understanding of autonomous ethics.
期刊介绍:
Russian Studies in Philosophy publishes thematic issues featuring selected scholarly papers from conferences and joint research projects as well as from the leading Russian-language journals in philosophy. Thematic coverage ranges over significant theoretical topics as well as topics in the history of philosophy, both European and Russian, including issues focused on institutions, schools, and figures such as Bakhtin, Fedorov, Leontev, Losev, Rozanov, Solovev, and Zinovev.