通过由外而内的矿床尺度构造地质分析,量化地质模型中矿产资源估算的不确定性

IF 1.2 4区 地球科学 Q3 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Australian Journal of Earth Sciences Pub Date : 2023-06-19 DOI:10.1080/08120099.2023.2217882
R. J. Reid, E. Cowan
{"title":"通过由外而内的矿床尺度构造地质分析,量化地质模型中矿产资源估算的不确定性","authors":"R. J. Reid, E. Cowan","doi":"10.1080/08120099.2023.2217882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Mineral Resource downgrades can be prevented by integrating better structural geological interpretations into project evaluations. Geological modelling for Mineral Resource estimation is presented as a systematic process of structural geological analysis at the deposit-scale using drill-sampled grade data. The initial step in this process is to use Maximum Intensity Projection (MIP) rendering to interpret axial symmetry and its orientation from the grade interval mid-points at the deposit-scale, thus reducing the modelling process’s degrees of freedom to only three—estimating the prolateness of the grade or lithological distribution. This approach contrasts with the brute-force methods for assessing modelling uncertainty because the axial direction is fixed to the down-plunge orientation, thus eliminating from the outset, structurally implausible geometric configurations and unrealistic geological scenarios common in brute-force methods. Adopting this new approach of creating geological models means moving away from conventional mining industry methods that prioritise operational considerations in constructing resource estimates but fail to explain the geometric complexities of mineral deposits. We use experiments and a practical case study of a historical gold mine in Western Australia to highlight the significance of analysing the structural control of a gold deposit at the deposit-scale using raw grade data. Our research is based on anecdotal evidence suggesting that erroneous geological modelling leads to unforeseen Mineral Resource downgrades. However, we cannot confirm this hypothesis because there have been few, if any, independent public inquiries into Mineral Resource downgrades. To establish the underlying reasons for significant resource downgrades with certainty, impartial investigations (modelled on accident investigations in the aviation industry) are imperative. KEY POINTS There is a general lack of incorporating structural geological knowledge in creating resource models, which can lead to poor outcomes such as Mineral Resource downgrades. Structural geological analysis of drill-sampled raw grade data allows the structural controls on a deposit to be better understood. We offer a simple workflow for understanding and modelling these patterns.","PeriodicalId":8601,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Earth Sciences","volume":"70 1","pages":"990 - 1009"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards quantifying uncertainties in geological models for mineral resource estimation through outside-in deposit-scale structural geological analysis\",\"authors\":\"R. J. Reid, E. Cowan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08120099.2023.2217882\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Mineral Resource downgrades can be prevented by integrating better structural geological interpretations into project evaluations. Geological modelling for Mineral Resource estimation is presented as a systematic process of structural geological analysis at the deposit-scale using drill-sampled grade data. The initial step in this process is to use Maximum Intensity Projection (MIP) rendering to interpret axial symmetry and its orientation from the grade interval mid-points at the deposit-scale, thus reducing the modelling process’s degrees of freedom to only three—estimating the prolateness of the grade or lithological distribution. This approach contrasts with the brute-force methods for assessing modelling uncertainty because the axial direction is fixed to the down-plunge orientation, thus eliminating from the outset, structurally implausible geometric configurations and unrealistic geological scenarios common in brute-force methods. Adopting this new approach of creating geological models means moving away from conventional mining industry methods that prioritise operational considerations in constructing resource estimates but fail to explain the geometric complexities of mineral deposits. We use experiments and a practical case study of a historical gold mine in Western Australia to highlight the significance of analysing the structural control of a gold deposit at the deposit-scale using raw grade data. Our research is based on anecdotal evidence suggesting that erroneous geological modelling leads to unforeseen Mineral Resource downgrades. However, we cannot confirm this hypothesis because there have been few, if any, independent public inquiries into Mineral Resource downgrades. To establish the underlying reasons for significant resource downgrades with certainty, impartial investigations (modelled on accident investigations in the aviation industry) are imperative. KEY POINTS There is a general lack of incorporating structural geological knowledge in creating resource models, which can lead to poor outcomes such as Mineral Resource downgrades. Structural geological analysis of drill-sampled raw grade data allows the structural controls on a deposit to be better understood. We offer a simple workflow for understanding and modelling these patterns.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8601,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Earth Sciences\",\"volume\":\"70 1\",\"pages\":\"990 - 1009\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Earth Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08120099.2023.2217882\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08120099.2023.2217882","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要通过将更好的构造地质解释纳入项目评估,可以防止矿产资源降级。矿产资源估算的地质建模是利用钻孔取样品位数据在矿床规模上进行结构地质分析的系统过程。该过程的第一步是使用最大强度投影(MIP)渲染来解释矿床规模的品位区间中点的轴对称性及其方向,从而将建模过程的自由度减少到只有三个——估计品位或岩性分布的突出性。这种方法与评估建模不确定性的蛮力方法形成对比,因为轴向方向固定在下倾方向,因此从一开始就消除了蛮力方法中常见的结构上不可信的几何配置和不切实际的地质场景。采用这种创建地质模型的新方法意味着放弃传统的采矿业方法,这种方法在构建资源估计时优先考虑运营因素,但无法解释矿床的几何复杂性。我们通过对西澳大利亚一座历史金矿的实验和实际案例研究,强调了使用原始品位数据在矿床规模上分析金矿结构控制的重要性。我们的研究基于传闻证据,表明错误的地质建模会导致无法预见的矿产资源降级。然而,我们无法证实这一假设,因为对矿产资源降级的独立公开调查很少(如果有的话)。为了确定资源大幅降级的根本原因,必须进行公正的调查(以航空业事故调查为模型)。关键点在创建资源模型时普遍缺乏结构地质知识,这可能导致不良结果,如矿产资源降级。通过对钻孔取样的原始品位数据进行结构地质分析,可以更好地了解矿床的结构控制。我们提供了一个简单的工作流程来理解和建模这些模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Towards quantifying uncertainties in geological models for mineral resource estimation through outside-in deposit-scale structural geological analysis
Abstract Mineral Resource downgrades can be prevented by integrating better structural geological interpretations into project evaluations. Geological modelling for Mineral Resource estimation is presented as a systematic process of structural geological analysis at the deposit-scale using drill-sampled grade data. The initial step in this process is to use Maximum Intensity Projection (MIP) rendering to interpret axial symmetry and its orientation from the grade interval mid-points at the deposit-scale, thus reducing the modelling process’s degrees of freedom to only three—estimating the prolateness of the grade or lithological distribution. This approach contrasts with the brute-force methods for assessing modelling uncertainty because the axial direction is fixed to the down-plunge orientation, thus eliminating from the outset, structurally implausible geometric configurations and unrealistic geological scenarios common in brute-force methods. Adopting this new approach of creating geological models means moving away from conventional mining industry methods that prioritise operational considerations in constructing resource estimates but fail to explain the geometric complexities of mineral deposits. We use experiments and a practical case study of a historical gold mine in Western Australia to highlight the significance of analysing the structural control of a gold deposit at the deposit-scale using raw grade data. Our research is based on anecdotal evidence suggesting that erroneous geological modelling leads to unforeseen Mineral Resource downgrades. However, we cannot confirm this hypothesis because there have been few, if any, independent public inquiries into Mineral Resource downgrades. To establish the underlying reasons for significant resource downgrades with certainty, impartial investigations (modelled on accident investigations in the aviation industry) are imperative. KEY POINTS There is a general lack of incorporating structural geological knowledge in creating resource models, which can lead to poor outcomes such as Mineral Resource downgrades. Structural geological analysis of drill-sampled raw grade data allows the structural controls on a deposit to be better understood. We offer a simple workflow for understanding and modelling these patterns.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Journal of Earth Sciences
Australian Journal of Earth Sciences 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
45
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australian Journal of Earth Sciences publishes peer-reviewed research papers as well as significant review articles of general interest to geoscientists. The Journal covers the whole field of earth science including basin studies, regional geophysical studies and metallogeny. There is usually a thematic issue each year featuring a selection of papers on a particular area of earth science. Shorter papers are encouraged and are given priority in publication. Critical discussion of recently published papers is also encouraged.
期刊最新文献
The Permian Watershed tungsten deposit (northeast Queensland, Australia): fluid inclusion and stable isotope constraints Origin of porosity in evaporite platform dolostone in the middle Cambrian Shaelek Formation, NW Tarim Basin, China: constraints from petrology, mineralogy and geochemistry Response of Permian sediment provenance conversion in Hainan Island to the closure of the Eastern Paleo-Tethys Ocean The White Hills Gravel of central Victoria: an anomalous Paleogene very coarse-grained fluvial deposit Yampi Peninsula felsic Hart Dolerite: re-evaluating the Nellie Tonalite using evidence from whole rock, petrography and geochronology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1