艺术与传播:现代文化中的一种新体验

Q4 Arts and Humanities Journal of Philosophy ARHE Pub Date : 2020-06-18 DOI:10.19090/arhe.2019.32.141-167
Kostas Theologou, Youli Rapti, Peter Fettner, Youli Papaioannou
{"title":"艺术与传播:现代文化中的一种新体验","authors":"Kostas Theologou, Youli Rapti, Peter Fettner, Youli Papaioannou","doi":"10.19090/arhe.2019.32.141-167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we discuss the deadlocks of defining art in modern culture. The lack of criteria and modernism revisited are of crucial issue in this account. The theoretical mainframe of our approach is founded on the Frankfurt School thinkers (Max Horkheimer, Theodor Adorno, Walter Benjamin), and of course Jürgen Habermas. This theoretical apparatus also draws on contemporary accounts given by Sorbonne Professor Marc Jimenez and art critic John A. Walker.[1] The paper discusses whether fine art may survive, in what forms – and to what purpose – in an age of mass media and in conditions of rapid networked communication. The paper sets off from the critical role radical art plays in today’s divided yet global world and on the continuing debates between high art and low culture, but reflects on the interaction between art, media and technology. \nTo support our argument we suggest Body Art and other web/digital and technological applications in art, and the cyber-art currently being produced for the internet. The paper acknowledges the numerous interactions between art and culture in a postmodern pluralistic world, and draws from the vast range of contemporary works of art to illustrate and to criticize theoretical points. The true test of theory in aesthetics is their application to particular cases. When a theory shows limitations in such an application, we gain clues as to what theoretical adjustments or innovations are called for to accommodate today’s works. \nThe introductory part of the essay comprehensively surveys recent debates on works of art, mass culture and society, and their socio-philosophical significance. The main discussion refers to the work of Walter Benjamin and Jürgen Habermas, aptly commented on by Marc Jimenez;[2] after exploring the complex relationships between culture and art as it’s reflected in that work, the argument provides an account of the 1980s political turn in aesthetics and explicates the impact of new communication technologies in modern culture. The narration is enhanced by specific examples of works of art in the era of mass media, web and digital culture, and underlines both the styles’ pluralism and the variety of parameters affecting the interaction between art and mass media communication. Critical findings and suggestions for further research conclude the paper. \n  \n[1] Marc Jimenez, Qu’est-ce que l’esthétique, Paris: Gallimard, 1997; John A. Walker, Art in the Age of Mass Media, London: Pluto, 2001. \n[2] Jimenez, Ibid.","PeriodicalId":38340,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Philosophy ARHE","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ART AND COMMUNICATION AS A NOVEL EXPERIENCE IN MODERN CULTURE\",\"authors\":\"Kostas Theologou, Youli Rapti, Peter Fettner, Youli Papaioannou\",\"doi\":\"10.19090/arhe.2019.32.141-167\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper we discuss the deadlocks of defining art in modern culture. The lack of criteria and modernism revisited are of crucial issue in this account. The theoretical mainframe of our approach is founded on the Frankfurt School thinkers (Max Horkheimer, Theodor Adorno, Walter Benjamin), and of course Jürgen Habermas. This theoretical apparatus also draws on contemporary accounts given by Sorbonne Professor Marc Jimenez and art critic John A. Walker.[1] The paper discusses whether fine art may survive, in what forms – and to what purpose – in an age of mass media and in conditions of rapid networked communication. The paper sets off from the critical role radical art plays in today’s divided yet global world and on the continuing debates between high art and low culture, but reflects on the interaction between art, media and technology. \\nTo support our argument we suggest Body Art and other web/digital and technological applications in art, and the cyber-art currently being produced for the internet. The paper acknowledges the numerous interactions between art and culture in a postmodern pluralistic world, and draws from the vast range of contemporary works of art to illustrate and to criticize theoretical points. The true test of theory in aesthetics is their application to particular cases. When a theory shows limitations in such an application, we gain clues as to what theoretical adjustments or innovations are called for to accommodate today’s works. \\nThe introductory part of the essay comprehensively surveys recent debates on works of art, mass culture and society, and their socio-philosophical significance. The main discussion refers to the work of Walter Benjamin and Jürgen Habermas, aptly commented on by Marc Jimenez;[2] after exploring the complex relationships between culture and art as it’s reflected in that work, the argument provides an account of the 1980s political turn in aesthetics and explicates the impact of new communication technologies in modern culture. The narration is enhanced by specific examples of works of art in the era of mass media, web and digital culture, and underlines both the styles’ pluralism and the variety of parameters affecting the interaction between art and mass media communication. Critical findings and suggestions for further research conclude the paper. \\n  \\n[1] Marc Jimenez, Qu’est-ce que l’esthétique, Paris: Gallimard, 1997; John A. Walker, Art in the Age of Mass Media, London: Pluto, 2001. \\n[2] Jimenez, Ibid.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38340,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Philosophy ARHE\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Philosophy ARHE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19090/arhe.2019.32.141-167\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Philosophy ARHE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19090/arhe.2019.32.141-167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我们讨论了现代文化中艺术定义的僵局。缺乏标准和重新审视现代主义是这篇报道中的关键问题。我们方法的理论框架建立在法兰克福学派思想家(马克斯·霍克海默、西奥多·阿多诺、沃尔特·本杰明)的基础上,当然还有于尔根·哈贝马斯。这个理论装置还借鉴了索邦大学教授Marc Jimenez和艺术评论家John A.Walker的当代描述。[1] 本文讨论了在大众媒体时代和快速网络传播的条件下,美术是否可以生存,以什么形式存在,达到什么目的。本文从激进艺术在当今分裂但全球化的世界中所扮演的关键角色,以及高艺术与低文化之间持续的争论出发,反思了艺术、媒体和技术之间的互动。为了支持我们的论点,我们建议身体艺术和其他网络/数字和技术在艺术中的应用,以及目前为互联网制作的网络艺术。本文承认了后现代多元世界中艺术与文化之间的诸多互动,并从当代大量的艺术作品中加以阐释和批判。美学理论的真正检验是它们在特定情况下的应用。当一个理论在这样的应用中显示出局限性时,我们就可以获得一些线索,了解需要什么样的理论调整或创新来适应今天的作品。文章的引言部分全面考察了近年来关于艺术作品、大众文化和社会的争论,以及它们的社会哲学意义。主要讨论的是沃尔特·本雅明和于尔根·哈贝马斯的作品,马克·希门尼斯对此作了恰当的评论;[2] 在探讨了这部作品中所反映的文化与艺术之间的复杂关系之后,这部作品讲述了20世纪80年代美学的政治转向,并阐述了新的传播技术对现代文化的影响。大众媒体、网络和数字文化时代的艺术作品的具体例子增强了叙事,强调了风格的多元化以及影响艺术与大众媒体传播互动的各种参数。关键发现和进一步研究的建议是论文的结论。[1]Marc Jimenez,《科学》,巴黎:Gallimard,1997年;约翰·A·沃克,《大众传媒时代的艺术》,伦敦:布鲁托出版社,2001年。[2] 希门尼斯,同上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ART AND COMMUNICATION AS A NOVEL EXPERIENCE IN MODERN CULTURE
In this paper we discuss the deadlocks of defining art in modern culture. The lack of criteria and modernism revisited are of crucial issue in this account. The theoretical mainframe of our approach is founded on the Frankfurt School thinkers (Max Horkheimer, Theodor Adorno, Walter Benjamin), and of course Jürgen Habermas. This theoretical apparatus also draws on contemporary accounts given by Sorbonne Professor Marc Jimenez and art critic John A. Walker.[1] The paper discusses whether fine art may survive, in what forms – and to what purpose – in an age of mass media and in conditions of rapid networked communication. The paper sets off from the critical role radical art plays in today’s divided yet global world and on the continuing debates between high art and low culture, but reflects on the interaction between art, media and technology. To support our argument we suggest Body Art and other web/digital and technological applications in art, and the cyber-art currently being produced for the internet. The paper acknowledges the numerous interactions between art and culture in a postmodern pluralistic world, and draws from the vast range of contemporary works of art to illustrate and to criticize theoretical points. The true test of theory in aesthetics is their application to particular cases. When a theory shows limitations in such an application, we gain clues as to what theoretical adjustments or innovations are called for to accommodate today’s works. The introductory part of the essay comprehensively surveys recent debates on works of art, mass culture and society, and their socio-philosophical significance. The main discussion refers to the work of Walter Benjamin and Jürgen Habermas, aptly commented on by Marc Jimenez;[2] after exploring the complex relationships between culture and art as it’s reflected in that work, the argument provides an account of the 1980s political turn in aesthetics and explicates the impact of new communication technologies in modern culture. The narration is enhanced by specific examples of works of art in the era of mass media, web and digital culture, and underlines both the styles’ pluralism and the variety of parameters affecting the interaction between art and mass media communication. Critical findings and suggestions for further research conclude the paper.   [1] Marc Jimenez, Qu’est-ce que l’esthétique, Paris: Gallimard, 1997; John A. Walker, Art in the Age of Mass Media, London: Pluto, 2001. [2] Jimenez, Ibid.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Philosophy ARHE
Journal of Philosophy ARHE Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
期刊最新文献
KRITIKA I NAJVIŠI INTERES UMA KOD KANTA KANT I HEMIJA BEZ MATEMATIKE KANT I ŠLOSER: O SLUČAJU POVIŠENOG TONA U FILOZOFIJI SMISAO OBRAZOVANJA U RUSOOVIM DELIMA MEŠOVITA PRIRODA PSIHOANALITIČKOG DISKURSA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1