在可持续修复评估的支持下,受lnapl影响的场地从主动修复到自然源区枯竭(NSZD)的过渡

IF 1.3 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology Pub Date : 2023-05-19 DOI:10.1144/qjegh2022-140
Tom M. Statham, Richard Sumner, A. F. Hill, Jonathan W. N. Smith
{"title":"在可持续修复评估的支持下,受lnapl影响的场地从主动修复到自然源区枯竭(NSZD)的过渡","authors":"Tom M. Statham, Richard Sumner, A. F. Hill, Jonathan W. N. Smith","doi":"10.1144/qjegh2022-140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Natural source zone depletion (NSZD) is increasingly being considered as a risk-management option at sites impacted with light non-aqueous phase liquids (LNAPL). NSZD can be applied in isolation or in combination with active remediation techniques, depending on site-specific risk management requirements. A case study of the transition from active remediation to passive NSZD is presented for a petroleum impacted site in northwest Europe. This transition was supported by multiple lines of evidence/management options including: the introduction of institutional controls on groundwater and land development restrictions, the results from a residual-NAPL risk assessment, monitoring to establish that the LNAPL plume is reducing in size, LNAPL transmissivity assessment, a CO2 equivalent assessment of remediation options, and a LNAPL recovery diminishing returns model. Through application of local sustainable remediation principles consistent with ISO / SuRF-UK sustainable remediation frameworks and tools, regulatory approval was obtained for a partial closeout of the remediation system. By the final year of operation, NSZD rates in the portion of the site on which transition to NSZD has been agreed were over three times greater than active LNAPL recovery rates (12,000 L/ha/a for NSZD; 3,800 L/ha/a for active LNAPL recovery). At the remaining active remediation areas total fluids extraction currently out-performs NSZD and will be continued until a comparable point is reached when NSZD removal exceeds active remediation. At that point transition to NSZD alone will be considered as the most sustainable risk-based approach.","PeriodicalId":20937,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transition from active remediation to natural source zone depletion (NSZD) at a LNAPL-impacted site, supported by sustainable remediation appraisal\",\"authors\":\"Tom M. Statham, Richard Sumner, A. F. Hill, Jonathan W. N. Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1144/qjegh2022-140\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Natural source zone depletion (NSZD) is increasingly being considered as a risk-management option at sites impacted with light non-aqueous phase liquids (LNAPL). NSZD can be applied in isolation or in combination with active remediation techniques, depending on site-specific risk management requirements. A case study of the transition from active remediation to passive NSZD is presented for a petroleum impacted site in northwest Europe. This transition was supported by multiple lines of evidence/management options including: the introduction of institutional controls on groundwater and land development restrictions, the results from a residual-NAPL risk assessment, monitoring to establish that the LNAPL plume is reducing in size, LNAPL transmissivity assessment, a CO2 equivalent assessment of remediation options, and a LNAPL recovery diminishing returns model. Through application of local sustainable remediation principles consistent with ISO / SuRF-UK sustainable remediation frameworks and tools, regulatory approval was obtained for a partial closeout of the remediation system. By the final year of operation, NSZD rates in the portion of the site on which transition to NSZD has been agreed were over three times greater than active LNAPL recovery rates (12,000 L/ha/a for NSZD; 3,800 L/ha/a for active LNAPL recovery). At the remaining active remediation areas total fluids extraction currently out-performs NSZD and will be continued until a comparable point is reached when NSZD removal exceeds active remediation. At that point transition to NSZD alone will be considered as the most sustainable risk-based approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1144/qjegh2022-140\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1144/qjegh2022-140","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在受轻质非水相液体(LNAPL)影响的地点,自然源区枯竭(NSZD)越来越被视为一种风险管理选择。NSZD可以单独使用,也可以与主动修复技术结合使用,具体取决于特定场地的风险管理要求。以欧洲西北部一处受石油影响的场地为例,介绍了从主动修复向被动NSZD过渡的案例研究。这一转变得到了多条证据/管理选择的支持,包括:对地下水和土地开发限制实行机构控制,国家适应行动方案剩余风险评估的结果,监测以确定LNAPL羽流的规模正在缩小,LNAPL透射率评估,对补救选择的二氧化碳当量评估,以及LNAPL恢复递减收益模型。通过应用符合ISO/SuRF英国可持续修复框架和工具的当地可持续修复原则,获得了修复系统部分关闭的监管批准。到运营的最后一年,已同意向NSZD过渡的现场部分的NSZD回收率是LNAPL有效回收率的三倍多(NSZD为12000 L/ha/a;LNAPL主动回收为3800 L/ha/a)。在剩余的主动修复区域,目前超过NSZD的总流体提取将继续进行,直到达到NSZD去除超过主动修复的可比点。届时,仅向NSZD过渡将被视为最可持续的基于风险的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Transition from active remediation to natural source zone depletion (NSZD) at a LNAPL-impacted site, supported by sustainable remediation appraisal
Natural source zone depletion (NSZD) is increasingly being considered as a risk-management option at sites impacted with light non-aqueous phase liquids (LNAPL). NSZD can be applied in isolation or in combination with active remediation techniques, depending on site-specific risk management requirements. A case study of the transition from active remediation to passive NSZD is presented for a petroleum impacted site in northwest Europe. This transition was supported by multiple lines of evidence/management options including: the introduction of institutional controls on groundwater and land development restrictions, the results from a residual-NAPL risk assessment, monitoring to establish that the LNAPL plume is reducing in size, LNAPL transmissivity assessment, a CO2 equivalent assessment of remediation options, and a LNAPL recovery diminishing returns model. Through application of local sustainable remediation principles consistent with ISO / SuRF-UK sustainable remediation frameworks and tools, regulatory approval was obtained for a partial closeout of the remediation system. By the final year of operation, NSZD rates in the portion of the site on which transition to NSZD has been agreed were over three times greater than active LNAPL recovery rates (12,000 L/ha/a for NSZD; 3,800 L/ha/a for active LNAPL recovery). At the remaining active remediation areas total fluids extraction currently out-performs NSZD and will be continued until a comparable point is reached when NSZD removal exceeds active remediation. At that point transition to NSZD alone will be considered as the most sustainable risk-based approach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
66
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology is owned by the Geological Society of London and published by the Geological Society Publishing House. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology & Hydrogeology (QJEGH) is an established peer reviewed international journal featuring papers on geology as applied to civil engineering mining practice and water resources. Papers are invited from, and about, all areas of the world on engineering geology and hydrogeology topics. This includes but is not limited to: applied geophysics, engineering geomorphology, environmental geology, hydrogeology, groundwater quality, ground source heat, contaminated land, waste management, land use planning, geotechnics, rock mechanics, geomaterials and geological hazards. The journal publishes the prestigious Glossop and Ineson lectures, research papers, case studies, review articles, technical notes, photographic features, thematic sets, discussion papers, editorial opinion and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Degradation and protection of cut slopes in weathered gneiss; a 40-year case study Development of a drought-resilient water supply from dolomitized limestones of the Irish Midlands Understanding the Behavior of Seismically Derived Poisson's Ratio in Near Surface Characterization Jet grouting to new depths in the Lambeth Group and Thanet Formation beneath London Size Effect of Anisotropy in Rocks Spatial Variability: Evaluating through Digital Drilling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1