物理治疗师循证实践概况:法国的一项横断面调查

IF 1.5 Q3 REHABILITATION European Journal of Physiotherapy Pub Date : 2022-04-21 DOI:10.1080/21679169.2022.2057587
Arnaud Bruchard, Xavier Laurent, Pauline Raul, Germain Saniel, Grégory Visery, Vincent Fontanier, Nadège Lemeunier
{"title":"物理治疗师循证实践概况:法国的一项横断面调查","authors":"Arnaud Bruchard, Xavier Laurent, Pauline Raul, Germain Saniel, Grégory Visery, Vincent Fontanier, Nadège Lemeunier","doi":"10.1080/21679169.2022.2057587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Purpose To establish an inventory of the Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) among physiotherapists (PT) in France assessing EBP knowledge, perception, and utilisation in practice. Method A cross-sectional survey was performed using a French translation of the EBP2 questionnaire including the 5 EBP domains (Relevance, Terminology, Confidence, Practice and Sympathy). Participants completed the online survey from February 26th to August 31st, 2021. Scores were summarised by EBP domain for each participant. Pairwise Pearson’s correlations between domains scores and a hierarchical clustering on principal component analysis were conducted. Results In total, 542 participants were included in the analysis. Majority of participants were male with median age of 30 years (IQR: 26–36 years). Regarding EBP domain scores, PT perceived relevance of EBP but had difficulty to apply it in practice. Furthermore, positive correlations exist between the 5 domains. Participants were divided into three clusters. Those reporting poor scientific analysis skills and high barriers were older, less graduated, less trained in EBP and graduated earlier. Conclusion French PT perceived research to be important in their current practice and had a favourable opinion of EBP. However, they reported a lack of confidence, difficulty to understand terminology and to use it in practice. These findings and their profiles may help to improve PT’s EBP education in France.","PeriodicalId":45694,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Physiotherapy","volume":"25 1","pages":"193 - 202"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evidence-based-practice profile among physiotherapists: a cross-sectional survey in France\",\"authors\":\"Arnaud Bruchard, Xavier Laurent, Pauline Raul, Germain Saniel, Grégory Visery, Vincent Fontanier, Nadège Lemeunier\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21679169.2022.2057587\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Purpose To establish an inventory of the Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) among physiotherapists (PT) in France assessing EBP knowledge, perception, and utilisation in practice. Method A cross-sectional survey was performed using a French translation of the EBP2 questionnaire including the 5 EBP domains (Relevance, Terminology, Confidence, Practice and Sympathy). Participants completed the online survey from February 26th to August 31st, 2021. Scores were summarised by EBP domain for each participant. Pairwise Pearson’s correlations between domains scores and a hierarchical clustering on principal component analysis were conducted. Results In total, 542 participants were included in the analysis. Majority of participants were male with median age of 30 years (IQR: 26–36 years). Regarding EBP domain scores, PT perceived relevance of EBP but had difficulty to apply it in practice. Furthermore, positive correlations exist between the 5 domains. Participants were divided into three clusters. Those reporting poor scientific analysis skills and high barriers were older, less graduated, less trained in EBP and graduated earlier. Conclusion French PT perceived research to be important in their current practice and had a favourable opinion of EBP. However, they reported a lack of confidence, difficulty to understand terminology and to use it in practice. These findings and their profiles may help to improve PT’s EBP education in France.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45694,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Physiotherapy\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"193 - 202\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Physiotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21679169.2022.2057587\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21679169.2022.2057587","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要目的建立一份法国物理治疗师循证实践(EBP)清单,评估循证实践的知识、感知和使用情况。方法采用法语翻译的EBP2问卷进行横断面调查,包括5个EBP领域(相关性、术语、信心、实践和同情)。参与者于2021年2月26日至8月31日完成了在线调查。每个参与者的得分按EBP域汇总。在主成分分析的基础上进行了领域得分之间的成对Pearson相关性和层次聚类。结果共有542名参与者被纳入分析。大多数参与者是男性,中位年龄为30岁 年(IQR:26-36 年)。关于EBP领域得分,PT感知到EBP的相关性,但在实践中难以应用。此外,这5个域之间存在正相关性。参与者被分为三组。那些报告科学分析技能差和障碍高的人年龄较大,毕业较少,在EBP方面接受的培训较少,毕业较早。结论法国PT认为这项研究在他们目前的实践中具有重要意义,并对EBP有好感。然而,他们报告说缺乏信心,难以理解术语并在实践中使用。这些发现及其简介可能有助于改善PT在法国的EBP教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evidence-based-practice profile among physiotherapists: a cross-sectional survey in France
Abstract Purpose To establish an inventory of the Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) among physiotherapists (PT) in France assessing EBP knowledge, perception, and utilisation in practice. Method A cross-sectional survey was performed using a French translation of the EBP2 questionnaire including the 5 EBP domains (Relevance, Terminology, Confidence, Practice and Sympathy). Participants completed the online survey from February 26th to August 31st, 2021. Scores were summarised by EBP domain for each participant. Pairwise Pearson’s correlations between domains scores and a hierarchical clustering on principal component analysis were conducted. Results In total, 542 participants were included in the analysis. Majority of participants were male with median age of 30 years (IQR: 26–36 years). Regarding EBP domain scores, PT perceived relevance of EBP but had difficulty to apply it in practice. Furthermore, positive correlations exist between the 5 domains. Participants were divided into three clusters. Those reporting poor scientific analysis skills and high barriers were older, less graduated, less trained in EBP and graduated earlier. Conclusion French PT perceived research to be important in their current practice and had a favourable opinion of EBP. However, they reported a lack of confidence, difficulty to understand terminology and to use it in practice. These findings and their profiles may help to improve PT’s EBP education in France.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Utilisation of the Hip Disability and Knee Injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score in physiotherapy following total hip and knee arthroplasty: a cross-sectional survey. Unravelling the digital competence of students in physiotherapy education through the European digital competence framework Complementary strategies to improve the qualitative analysis: exemplified by our studies of physiotherapy in shoulder problems Beyond one size fits All - Personalised prevention strategies using physical activity: editorial Comparing treadmill and overground versions of the two-minute walk test in people with low back pain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1