贷款损失准备金和回报可预测性:动态视角

IF 1.9 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE China Journal of Accounting Research Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cjar.2022.100224
Phoebe Gao , Chu Yeong Lim , Xiumei Liu , Cheng Colin Zeng
{"title":"贷款损失准备金和回报可预测性:动态视角","authors":"Phoebe Gao ,&nbsp;Chu Yeong Lim ,&nbsp;Xiumei Liu ,&nbsp;Cheng Colin Zeng","doi":"10.1016/j.cjar.2022.100224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper examines the impact of loan loss provisions (LLPs) on return predictability during 1994–2017. We find that on average, LLPs are negatively associated with one year ahead stock returns. This effect is particularly significant during the global financial crisis but much weaker during the Basel II and III periods. Consistent with these findings, a long–short trading strategy based on LLPs generates positive abnormal returns during the Basel II and III periods but negative abnormal returns during the financial crisis. Cross-sectional tests show that this effect is more pronounced among banks with greater information asymmetry. Decomposition of LLPs suggests that these findings are driven mainly by nondiscretionary LLPs. Overall, our results suggest that the relationship between LLPs and future stock returns is not linear but contingent on bank regulations and macroeconomic conditions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45688,"journal":{"name":"China Journal of Accounting Research","volume":"15 2","pages":"Article 100224"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755309122000041/pdfft?md5=7f080f0bcb868f67e53524763777761e&pid=1-s2.0-S1755309122000041-main.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Loan loss provisions and return predictability: A dynamic perspective\",\"authors\":\"Phoebe Gao ,&nbsp;Chu Yeong Lim ,&nbsp;Xiumei Liu ,&nbsp;Cheng Colin Zeng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cjar.2022.100224\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper examines the impact of loan loss provisions (LLPs) on return predictability during 1994–2017. We find that on average, LLPs are negatively associated with one year ahead stock returns. This effect is particularly significant during the global financial crisis but much weaker during the Basel II and III periods. Consistent with these findings, a long–short trading strategy based on LLPs generates positive abnormal returns during the Basel II and III periods but negative abnormal returns during the financial crisis. Cross-sectional tests show that this effect is more pronounced among banks with greater information asymmetry. Decomposition of LLPs suggests that these findings are driven mainly by nondiscretionary LLPs. Overall, our results suggest that the relationship between LLPs and future stock returns is not linear but contingent on bank regulations and macroeconomic conditions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45688,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"China Journal of Accounting Research\",\"volume\":\"15 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100224\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755309122000041/pdfft?md5=7f080f0bcb868f67e53524763777761e&pid=1-s2.0-S1755309122000041-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"China Journal of Accounting Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755309122000041\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China Journal of Accounting Research","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755309122000041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文研究了1994-2017年期间贷款损失准备金(llp)对收益可预测性的影响。我们发现,平均而言,llp与未来一年的股票回报呈负相关。这种影响在全球金融危机期间尤为显著,但在巴塞尔协议II和III期间则要弱得多。与这些发现一致,基于llp的多空交易策略在巴塞尔协议II和III期间产生正的异常回报,但在金融危机期间产生负的异常回报。横断面测试表明,这种影响在信息不对称程度较高的银行中更为明显。对llp的分解表明,这些发现主要是由非酌情llp驱动的。总体而言,我们的研究结果表明llp与未来股票收益之间的关系不是线性的,而是取决于银行监管和宏观经济条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Loan loss provisions and return predictability: A dynamic perspective

This paper examines the impact of loan loss provisions (LLPs) on return predictability during 1994–2017. We find that on average, LLPs are negatively associated with one year ahead stock returns. This effect is particularly significant during the global financial crisis but much weaker during the Basel II and III periods. Consistent with these findings, a long–short trading strategy based on LLPs generates positive abnormal returns during the Basel II and III periods but negative abnormal returns during the financial crisis. Cross-sectional tests show that this effect is more pronounced among banks with greater information asymmetry. Decomposition of LLPs suggests that these findings are driven mainly by nondiscretionary LLPs. Overall, our results suggest that the relationship between LLPs and future stock returns is not linear but contingent on bank regulations and macroeconomic conditions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
295
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The focus of the China Journal of Accounting Research is to publish theoretical and empirical research papers that use contemporary research methodologies to investigate issues about accounting, corporate finance, auditing and corporate governance in the Greater China region, countries related to the Belt and Road Initiative, and other emerging and developed markets. The Journal encourages the applications of economic and sociological theories to analyze and explain accounting issues within the legal and institutional framework, and to explore accounting issues under different capital markets accurately and succinctly. The published research articles of the Journal will enable scholars to extract relevant issues about accounting, corporate finance, auditing and corporate governance related to the capital markets and institutional environment.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Coping strategy of independent directors for job-fulfillment risk under different ownership types and enforced legal environments How does digital transformation affect corporate accounting employees? ESG performance and cost of debt Personal data security and stock crash risk: Evidence from China’s Cybersecurity Law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1