政治联系、政府管制与风险承担——来自中国的证据

IF 1.5 4区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Frontiers of Economics in China Pub Date : 2019-01-03 DOI:10.3868/S060-007-018-0030-7
Shangzhou Ji, George Wang
{"title":"政治联系、政府管制与风险承担——来自中国的证据","authors":"Shangzhou Ji, George Wang","doi":"10.3868/S060-007-018-0030-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sufficient evidence suggests that enterprises under strong government regulations suffer the economic effects of political connections, which not only leads to competitive disadvantages and loss of innovation, but also less willingness to take risks. This paper explores the relationship between political connections and corporate risk-taking behavior in corporate governance. Specifically, in 2008, the Chinese government announced new policies to regulate government officials concurrently holding the positions of independent directors in firms. We sample publicly listed firms in the Chinese A-share market over the period of 2005¨C2010 and investigate changes in risk-taking behavior due to the new policies. Our findings indicate that a reduction in politically connected independent directors may encourage risk-taking behavior subject to the factors of state ownership, industry regulations, local government control, and corporate characteristics.","PeriodicalId":44830,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers of Economics in China","volume":"13 1","pages":"655-684"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Political Connections, Government Regulations and Risk-Taking — Evidence From China\",\"authors\":\"Shangzhou Ji, George Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.3868/S060-007-018-0030-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Sufficient evidence suggests that enterprises under strong government regulations suffer the economic effects of political connections, which not only leads to competitive disadvantages and loss of innovation, but also less willingness to take risks. This paper explores the relationship between political connections and corporate risk-taking behavior in corporate governance. Specifically, in 2008, the Chinese government announced new policies to regulate government officials concurrently holding the positions of independent directors in firms. We sample publicly listed firms in the Chinese A-share market over the period of 2005¨C2010 and investigate changes in risk-taking behavior due to the new policies. Our findings indicate that a reduction in politically connected independent directors may encourage risk-taking behavior subject to the factors of state ownership, industry regulations, local government control, and corporate characteristics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44830,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers of Economics in China\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"655-684\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers of Economics in China\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3868/S060-007-018-0030-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers of Economics in China","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3868/S060-007-018-0030-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

充分的证据表明,在强有力的政府监管下,企业会受到政治联系的经济影响,这不仅会导致竞争劣势和创新损失,还会降低承担风险的意愿。本文探讨了公司治理中政治关系与公司风险承担行为之间的关系。具体而言,2008年,中国政府宣布了新的政策,对政府官员兼任公司独立董事的行为进行监管。我们在2005年至2010年期间对中国A股上市公司进行了抽样调查,并调查了新政策导致的风险承担行为的变化。我们的研究结果表明,受国家所有权、行业法规、地方政府控制和企业特征等因素的影响,政治关联独立董事的减少可能会鼓励冒险行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Political Connections, Government Regulations and Risk-Taking — Evidence From China
Sufficient evidence suggests that enterprises under strong government regulations suffer the economic effects of political connections, which not only leads to competitive disadvantages and loss of innovation, but also less willingness to take risks. This paper explores the relationship between political connections and corporate risk-taking behavior in corporate governance. Specifically, in 2008, the Chinese government announced new policies to regulate government officials concurrently holding the positions of independent directors in firms. We sample publicly listed firms in the Chinese A-share market over the period of 2005¨C2010 and investigate changes in risk-taking behavior due to the new policies. Our findings indicate that a reduction in politically connected independent directors may encourage risk-taking behavior subject to the factors of state ownership, industry regulations, local government control, and corporate characteristics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
373
期刊介绍: Frontiers of Economics in China seeks to provide a forum for a broad blend of peer-reviewed academic papers of economics in order to promote communication and exchanges between economists in China and abroad. It will reflect the enormous advances that are currently being made in China in the field of economy and society. In addition, this journal also bears the mission of introducing the academic achievements on Chinese economics research to the world.
期刊最新文献
Hit Hard but Recover Slowly: The Asymmetric Effects of Social Distancing Policies on the US Labor Market Analysis of COVID-19 Prevention and Control Modes and Effects Impact of COVID-19 on the US and Texas Economy: A General Equilibrium Approach The Impact of COVID-19 on Stock Market in China New Nosocomephobia? Changes in Hospitalizations during the COVID-19 Pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1