第117届国会联邦护理政策的可能性:走向扩大亲属关系和集体化护理

IF 1.3 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Educational Studies-AESA Pub Date : 2023-01-25 DOI:10.1080/00131946.2023.2169693
Briana M. Bivens
{"title":"第117届国会联邦护理政策的可能性:走向扩大亲属关系和集体化护理","authors":"Briana M. Bivens","doi":"10.1080/00131946.2023.2169693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this article, I position federal policy as a shaper of familial life capable of capacitating new forms of relationality. I review three key child and family provisions in the Build Back Better social policy package proposed by the Biden administration: the expanded child tax credit, universal pre-K, and the expansion of federal childcare subsidies. I trace the sociopolitical context surrounding Biden’s endorsement of these child and family care provisions, highlighting how socialist and abolitionist organizing and the COVID-19 pandemic functioned as twin possibility-making forces, thrusting social democratic federal policy onto the agenda of arguably the most moderate Democratic candidate in the 2020 presidential primary. I argue that these social policies have the ontological capacity to shape an image of care and belonging that challenges the nuclear family form and neoliberal discursive productions of care, advancing more just, collective, and relational notions of responsibility and carework.","PeriodicalId":46285,"journal":{"name":"Educational Studies-AESA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Federal Care Policy Possibilities in the 117th Congress: Toward Expansive Kinship and Collectivized Carework\",\"authors\":\"Briana M. Bivens\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00131946.2023.2169693\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In this article, I position federal policy as a shaper of familial life capable of capacitating new forms of relationality. I review three key child and family provisions in the Build Back Better social policy package proposed by the Biden administration: the expanded child tax credit, universal pre-K, and the expansion of federal childcare subsidies. I trace the sociopolitical context surrounding Biden’s endorsement of these child and family care provisions, highlighting how socialist and abolitionist organizing and the COVID-19 pandemic functioned as twin possibility-making forces, thrusting social democratic federal policy onto the agenda of arguably the most moderate Democratic candidate in the 2020 presidential primary. I argue that these social policies have the ontological capacity to shape an image of care and belonging that challenges the nuclear family form and neoliberal discursive productions of care, advancing more just, collective, and relational notions of responsibility and carework.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46285,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Educational Studies-AESA\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Educational Studies-AESA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2023.2169693\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Studies-AESA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2023.2169693","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要在这篇文章中,我将联邦政策定位为能够塑造新形式关系的家庭生活的塑造者。我回顾了拜登政府提出的“重建美好社会”一揽子政策中的三项关键儿童和家庭条款:扩大儿童税收抵免、普及学前教育和扩大联邦儿童保育补贴。我追溯了拜登支持这些儿童和家庭护理条款的社会政治背景,强调了社会主义和废奴主义组织以及新冠肺炎疫情是如何作为两种可能的力量发挥作用的,将社会民主联邦政策推上了2020年总统初选中可以说是最温和的民主党候选人的议程。我认为,这些社会政策具有塑造关爱和归属感形象的本体论能力,它挑战了核心家庭形式和新自由主义的关爱话语产物,推进了更公正、集体和关系的责任和关爱概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Federal Care Policy Possibilities in the 117th Congress: Toward Expansive Kinship and Collectivized Carework
Abstract In this article, I position federal policy as a shaper of familial life capable of capacitating new forms of relationality. I review three key child and family provisions in the Build Back Better social policy package proposed by the Biden administration: the expanded child tax credit, universal pre-K, and the expansion of federal childcare subsidies. I trace the sociopolitical context surrounding Biden’s endorsement of these child and family care provisions, highlighting how socialist and abolitionist organizing and the COVID-19 pandemic functioned as twin possibility-making forces, thrusting social democratic federal policy onto the agenda of arguably the most moderate Democratic candidate in the 2020 presidential primary. I argue that these social policies have the ontological capacity to shape an image of care and belonging that challenges the nuclear family form and neoliberal discursive productions of care, advancing more just, collective, and relational notions of responsibility and carework.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Educational Studies-AESA
Educational Studies-AESA EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
33
期刊最新文献
Teaching innovation factors: analysis from three Iberoamerican countries The impact of sibling size on children’s academic performance; a case study of female high school students in Tehran Social entrepreneurship and career adaptability: the mediating effect of pre-service teachers’ self-efficacy “We Need to Talk about This More”: Students on Just War and How to End War “Close and desirable for whom?”: parents traversing racialised spaces and places in gentrifying U.S. schools
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1