为什么选择BDU?具有离散和连续变量的正则贝叶斯网络结构学习

IF 4.4 2区 数学 Q1 STATISTICS & PROBABILITY Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Computational Statistics Pub Date : 2021-03-01 DOI:10.1002/wics.1554
J. Suzuki
{"title":"为什么选择BDU?具有离散和连续变量的正则贝叶斯网络结构学习","authors":"J. Suzuki","doi":"10.1002/wics.1554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We consider the problem of Bayesian network structure learning (BNSL) from data. In particular, we focus on the score‐based approach rather than the constraint‐based approach and address what score we should use for the purpose. The Bayesian Dirichlet equivalent uniform (BDeu) has been mainly used within the community of BNs (not outside of it). We know that for any model selection and any data, the fitter the data to a model, the more complex the model, and vice versa. However, recently, it was proven that BDeu violates regularity, which means that it does not balance the two factors, although it works satisfactorily (consistently) when the sample size is infinitely large. In addition, we claim that the merit of using the regular scores over the BDeu is that tighter bounds of pruning rules are available when we consider efficient BNSL. Finally, using experiments, we compare the performances of the procedures to examine the claim. (This paper is for review and gives a unified viewpoint from the recent progress on the topic.)","PeriodicalId":47779,"journal":{"name":"Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Computational Statistics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/wics.1554","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why BDeu? Regular Bayesian network structure learning with discrete and continuous variables\",\"authors\":\"J. Suzuki\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/wics.1554\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We consider the problem of Bayesian network structure learning (BNSL) from data. In particular, we focus on the score‐based approach rather than the constraint‐based approach and address what score we should use for the purpose. The Bayesian Dirichlet equivalent uniform (BDeu) has been mainly used within the community of BNs (not outside of it). We know that for any model selection and any data, the fitter the data to a model, the more complex the model, and vice versa. However, recently, it was proven that BDeu violates regularity, which means that it does not balance the two factors, although it works satisfactorily (consistently) when the sample size is infinitely large. In addition, we claim that the merit of using the regular scores over the BDeu is that tighter bounds of pruning rules are available when we consider efficient BNSL. Finally, using experiments, we compare the performances of the procedures to examine the claim. (This paper is for review and gives a unified viewpoint from the recent progress on the topic.)\",\"PeriodicalId\":47779,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Computational Statistics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/wics.1554\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Computational Statistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.1554\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Computational Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.1554","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

研究了基于数据的贝叶斯网络结构学习问题。特别是,我们专注于基于分数的方法,而不是基于约束的方法,并解决我们应该使用什么分数来达到目的。贝叶斯狄利克雷等效均匀性(BDeu)主要在bn社区内使用(而不是在其外)。我们知道,对于任何模型选择和任何数据,数据越适合模型,模型就越复杂,反之亦然。然而,最近,人们证明BDeu违反了规律性,这意味着它不能平衡这两个因素,尽管它在样本量无限大时工作得令人满意(一致)。此外,我们声称使用正则分数优于BDeu的优点是,当我们考虑有效的BNSL时,可以使用更严格的修剪规则边界。最后,通过实验,我们比较了程序的性能来检验索赔。(本文仅供回顾,并从该主题的最新进展中给出一个统一的观点。)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Why BDeu? Regular Bayesian network structure learning with discrete and continuous variables
We consider the problem of Bayesian network structure learning (BNSL) from data. In particular, we focus on the score‐based approach rather than the constraint‐based approach and address what score we should use for the purpose. The Bayesian Dirichlet equivalent uniform (BDeu) has been mainly used within the community of BNs (not outside of it). We know that for any model selection and any data, the fitter the data to a model, the more complex the model, and vice versa. However, recently, it was proven that BDeu violates regularity, which means that it does not balance the two factors, although it works satisfactorily (consistently) when the sample size is infinitely large. In addition, we claim that the merit of using the regular scores over the BDeu is that tighter bounds of pruning rules are available when we consider efficient BNSL. Finally, using experiments, we compare the performances of the procedures to examine the claim. (This paper is for review and gives a unified viewpoint from the recent progress on the topic.)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊最新文献
Neuroimaging statistical approaches for determining neural correlates of Alzheimer's disease via positron emission tomography imaging. A spectrum of explainable and interpretable machine learning approaches for genomic studies Functional neuroimaging in the era of Big Data and Open Science: A modern overview Information criteria for model selection Data Integration in Causal Inference.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1