不同移植类型粪便多重PCR检测在实体器官移植后急性腹泻中的差异

Abhishek Verma, Ashley M. Hine, Andrew M Joelson, R. Mei, B. Lebwohl, J. Axelrad
{"title":"不同移植类型粪便多重PCR检测在实体器官移植后急性腹泻中的差异","authors":"Abhishek Verma, Ashley M. Hine, Andrew M Joelson, R. Mei, B. Lebwohl, J. Axelrad","doi":"10.3389/fgstr.2022.1064187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Diarrhea in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients is common, morbid, and increasingly evaluated using multiplex gastrointestinal PCR panel (GI panel) testing. We aimed to characterize differences between transplant organ types in GI panel evaluation of acute diarrhea in SOT recipients. Methods We performed a dual-center retrospective cross-sectional study of adult SOT recipients with acute diarrhea who underwent GI panel testing. Demographic, transplant, testing context, and GI panel data were collected. Patients were stratified by transplant type. The primary outcome was a positive GI panel. Results Of 300 transplant recipients (58 heart, 65 liver, 68 lung, and 109 renal), 118 had a positive GI panel. Renal transplant status correlated with more frequently positive GI panel and less frequent hospitalization. In a multivariate analysis adjusting for demographic factors, hospitalization, immunosuppression, and transplant age, renal transplantation was independently associated with a positive GI panel compared to lung transplantation (aOR 2.98, 95% CI 1.27-7.16). Older transplant age and outpatient testing were also independently associated with a positive GI panel. The GI panel result was associated with changes to antibiotic management. Conclusions In the evaluation of SOT recipients with acute diarrhea, GI panel result varies by transplant type, transplant age, and testing location and may affect subsequent antimicrobial therapy.","PeriodicalId":73085,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences by transplant type in stool multiplex PCR testing for acute diarrhea in post-solid organ transplantation\",\"authors\":\"Abhishek Verma, Ashley M. Hine, Andrew M Joelson, R. Mei, B. Lebwohl, J. Axelrad\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fgstr.2022.1064187\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Diarrhea in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients is common, morbid, and increasingly evaluated using multiplex gastrointestinal PCR panel (GI panel) testing. We aimed to characterize differences between transplant organ types in GI panel evaluation of acute diarrhea in SOT recipients. Methods We performed a dual-center retrospective cross-sectional study of adult SOT recipients with acute diarrhea who underwent GI panel testing. Demographic, transplant, testing context, and GI panel data were collected. Patients were stratified by transplant type. The primary outcome was a positive GI panel. Results Of 300 transplant recipients (58 heart, 65 liver, 68 lung, and 109 renal), 118 had a positive GI panel. Renal transplant status correlated with more frequently positive GI panel and less frequent hospitalization. In a multivariate analysis adjusting for demographic factors, hospitalization, immunosuppression, and transplant age, renal transplantation was independently associated with a positive GI panel compared to lung transplantation (aOR 2.98, 95% CI 1.27-7.16). Older transplant age and outpatient testing were also independently associated with a positive GI panel. The GI panel result was associated with changes to antibiotic management. Conclusions In the evaluation of SOT recipients with acute diarrhea, GI panel result varies by transplant type, transplant age, and testing location and may affect subsequent antimicrobial therapy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73085,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fgstr.2022.1064187\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fgstr.2022.1064187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景固体器官移植(SOT)受者腹泻是常见的、病态的,并且越来越多地使用多重胃肠道PCR小组(GI小组)检测进行评估。我们的目的是在SOT受者急性腹泻的胃肠道小组评估中描述移植器官类型之间的差异。方法我们对接受胃肠道小组测试的患有急性腹泻的成年SOT受试者进行了双中心回顾性横断面研究。收集人口统计学、移植、测试环境和胃肠道专家组数据。患者按移植类型进行分层。主要结果是胃肠道检查呈阳性。结果在300名移植受者(58名心脏、65名肝脏、68名肺部和109名肾脏)中,118人的胃肠道阳性。肾移植状态与更频繁的GI阳性组和更少的住院频率相关。在一项调整了人口统计学因素、住院、免疫抑制和移植年龄的多变量分析中,与肺移植相比,肾移植与胃肠道阳性组独立相关(aOR 2.98,95%CI 1.27-7.16)。年龄较大的移植年龄和门诊检测也与胃肠道阴性组独立相关。胃肠道专家组的结果与抗生素管理的变化有关。结论在评估SOT受者急性腹泻时,GI组结果因移植类型、移植年龄和检测地点而异,并可能影响后续的抗菌治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Differences by transplant type in stool multiplex PCR testing for acute diarrhea in post-solid organ transplantation
Background Diarrhea in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients is common, morbid, and increasingly evaluated using multiplex gastrointestinal PCR panel (GI panel) testing. We aimed to characterize differences between transplant organ types in GI panel evaluation of acute diarrhea in SOT recipients. Methods We performed a dual-center retrospective cross-sectional study of adult SOT recipients with acute diarrhea who underwent GI panel testing. Demographic, transplant, testing context, and GI panel data were collected. Patients were stratified by transplant type. The primary outcome was a positive GI panel. Results Of 300 transplant recipients (58 heart, 65 liver, 68 lung, and 109 renal), 118 had a positive GI panel. Renal transplant status correlated with more frequently positive GI panel and less frequent hospitalization. In a multivariate analysis adjusting for demographic factors, hospitalization, immunosuppression, and transplant age, renal transplantation was independently associated with a positive GI panel compared to lung transplantation (aOR 2.98, 95% CI 1.27-7.16). Older transplant age and outpatient testing were also independently associated with a positive GI panel. The GI panel result was associated with changes to antibiotic management. Conclusions In the evaluation of SOT recipients with acute diarrhea, GI panel result varies by transplant type, transplant age, and testing location and may affect subsequent antimicrobial therapy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Current status and clinical applications of tissue engineering of the gastrointestinal tract: a systematized narrative review Fecal microbiota transplantation—could stool donors’ and receptors’ diet be the key to future success? X-ray phase-contrast 3D virtual histology characterises complex tissue architecture in colorectal cancer Adalimumab biosimilar ABP 501 is equally effective and safe in long-term management of inflammatory bowel diseases patients when used as first biologic treatment or as replace of the ADA originator for a non-medical reason A blood-based transcriptomic signature stratifies severe Crohn’s disease and defines potentially targetable therapeutic pathways
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1