控制变分多项式混沌:高保真度不确定性量化的采样和代理的最佳融合

IF 1.5 4区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification Pub Date : 2022-01-26 DOI:10.1615/int.j.uncertaintyquantification.2022043638
Hang Yang, Y. Fujii, K. W. Wang, A. Gorodetsky
{"title":"控制变分多项式混沌:高保真度不确定性量化的采样和代理的最佳融合","authors":"Hang Yang, Y. Fujii, K. W. Wang, A. Gorodetsky","doi":"10.1615/int.j.uncertaintyquantification.2022043638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present a hybrid sampling-surrogate approach for reducing the computational expense of uncertainty quantification in nonlinear dynamical systems. Our motivation is to enable rapid uncertainty quantification in complex mechanical systems such as automotive propulsion systems. Our approach is to build upon ideas from multifidelity uncertainty quantification to leverage the benefits of both sampling and surrogate modeling, while mitigating their downsides. In particular, the surrogate model is selected to exploit problem structure, such as smoothness, and offers a highly correlated information source to the original nonlinear dynamical system. We utilize an intrusive generalized Polynomial Chaos surrogate because it avoids any statistical errors in its construction and provides analytic estimates of output statistics. We then leverage a Monte Carlo-based Control Variate technique to correct the bias caused by the surrogate approximation error. The primary theoretical contribution of this work is the analysis and solution of an estimator design strategy that optimally balances the computational effort needed to adapt a surrogate compared with sampling the original expensive nonlinear system. While previous works have similarly combined surrogates and sampling, to our best knowledge this work is the first to provide rigorous analysis of estimator design. We deploy our approach on multiple examples stemming from the simulation of mechanical automotive propulsion system models. We show that the estimator is able to achieve orders of magnitude reduction in mean squared error of statistics estimation in some cases under comparable costs of purely sampling or purely surrogate approaches.","PeriodicalId":48814,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Control Variate Polynomial Chaos: Optimal Fusion of Sampling and Surrogates for Multifidelity Uncertainty Quantification\",\"authors\":\"Hang Yang, Y. Fujii, K. W. Wang, A. Gorodetsky\",\"doi\":\"10.1615/int.j.uncertaintyquantification.2022043638\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We present a hybrid sampling-surrogate approach for reducing the computational expense of uncertainty quantification in nonlinear dynamical systems. Our motivation is to enable rapid uncertainty quantification in complex mechanical systems such as automotive propulsion systems. Our approach is to build upon ideas from multifidelity uncertainty quantification to leverage the benefits of both sampling and surrogate modeling, while mitigating their downsides. In particular, the surrogate model is selected to exploit problem structure, such as smoothness, and offers a highly correlated information source to the original nonlinear dynamical system. We utilize an intrusive generalized Polynomial Chaos surrogate because it avoids any statistical errors in its construction and provides analytic estimates of output statistics. We then leverage a Monte Carlo-based Control Variate technique to correct the bias caused by the surrogate approximation error. The primary theoretical contribution of this work is the analysis and solution of an estimator design strategy that optimally balances the computational effort needed to adapt a surrogate compared with sampling the original expensive nonlinear system. While previous works have similarly combined surrogates and sampling, to our best knowledge this work is the first to provide rigorous analysis of estimator design. We deploy our approach on multiple examples stemming from the simulation of mechanical automotive propulsion system models. We show that the estimator is able to achieve orders of magnitude reduction in mean squared error of statistics estimation in some cases under comparable costs of purely sampling or purely surrogate approaches.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48814,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1615/int.j.uncertaintyquantification.2022043638\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1615/int.j.uncertaintyquantification.2022043638","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

为了减少非线性动力系统不确定性量化的计算费用,提出了一种混合采样-代理方法。我们的动机是在复杂的机械系统,如汽车推进系统中实现快速的不确定性量化。我们的方法是建立在多保真度不确定性量化的思想基础上,利用采样和代理建模的优点,同时减轻它们的缺点。特别地,选择代理模型来开发问题的结构,如平滑性,并为原始非线性动力系统提供高度相关的信息源。我们使用侵入式广义多项式混沌代理,因为它避免了其构造中的任何统计误差,并提供了输出统计量的分析估计。然后,我们利用基于蒙特卡罗的控制变量技术来纠正由代理近似误差引起的偏差。这项工作的主要理论贡献是分析和解决了一种估计器设计策略,该策略与对原始昂贵的非线性系统进行采样相比,最优地平衡了适应代理所需的计算工作量。虽然以前的工作类似地结合了代理和抽样,但据我们所知,这项工作是第一次提供对估计器设计的严格分析。我们将我们的方法应用于来自机械汽车推进系统模型仿真的多个示例。我们表明,在纯抽样或纯代理方法的可比成本下,在某些情况下,估计器能够实现统计估计的均方误差的数量级降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Control Variate Polynomial Chaos: Optimal Fusion of Sampling and Surrogates for Multifidelity Uncertainty Quantification
We present a hybrid sampling-surrogate approach for reducing the computational expense of uncertainty quantification in nonlinear dynamical systems. Our motivation is to enable rapid uncertainty quantification in complex mechanical systems such as automotive propulsion systems. Our approach is to build upon ideas from multifidelity uncertainty quantification to leverage the benefits of both sampling and surrogate modeling, while mitigating their downsides. In particular, the surrogate model is selected to exploit problem structure, such as smoothness, and offers a highly correlated information source to the original nonlinear dynamical system. We utilize an intrusive generalized Polynomial Chaos surrogate because it avoids any statistical errors in its construction and provides analytic estimates of output statistics. We then leverage a Monte Carlo-based Control Variate technique to correct the bias caused by the surrogate approximation error. The primary theoretical contribution of this work is the analysis and solution of an estimator design strategy that optimally balances the computational effort needed to adapt a surrogate compared with sampling the original expensive nonlinear system. While previous works have similarly combined surrogates and sampling, to our best knowledge this work is the first to provide rigorous analysis of estimator design. We deploy our approach on multiple examples stemming from the simulation of mechanical automotive propulsion system models. We show that the estimator is able to achieve orders of magnitude reduction in mean squared error of statistics estimation in some cases under comparable costs of purely sampling or purely surrogate approaches.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification
International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: The International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification disseminates information of permanent interest in the areas of analysis, modeling, design and control of complex systems in the presence of uncertainty. The journal seeks to emphasize methods that cross stochastic analysis, statistical modeling and scientific computing. Systems of interest are governed by differential equations possibly with multiscale features. Topics of particular interest include representation of uncertainty, propagation of uncertainty across scales, resolving the curse of dimensionality, long-time integration for stochastic PDEs, data-driven approaches for constructing stochastic models, validation, verification and uncertainty quantification for predictive computational science, and visualization of uncertainty in high-dimensional spaces. Bayesian computation and machine learning techniques are also of interest for example in the context of stochastic multiscale systems, for model selection/classification, and decision making. Reports addressing the dynamic coupling of modern experiments and modeling approaches towards predictive science are particularly encouraged. Applications of uncertainty quantification in all areas of physical and biological sciences are appropriate.
期刊最新文献
Bayesian³ Active learning for regularized arbitrary multi-element polynomial chaos using information theory Sobol’ sensitivity indices– A Machine Learning approach using the Dynamic Adaptive Variances Estimator with Given Data Extremes of vector-valued processes by finite dimensional models A novel probabilistic transfer learning strategy for polynomial regression Variance-based sensitivity of Bayesian inverse problems to the prior distribution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1