大学生真实评估量表的研制� 学习和表现

A. Hindriana, I. Setiawati
{"title":"大学生真实评估量表的研制� 学习和表现","authors":"A. Hindriana, I. Setiawati","doi":"10.25134/ijli.v1i1.1279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Learning achievement that is currently being assessed, generally focusing only on cognitive domain, this is certainly contradicting to the term of assessment that should be done in accordance with learning achievement stated in curriculum. Authentic assessment needs right instrument to assess learning achievement. One of the instruments needed is assessment rubric. The rubric that currently been used does not have the same standard, which is not accordance with the principals of assessment. Based on that study, the assessment rubric is developed, consisting four components; job description, scale, dimension, and dimension description. The data was descriptively analyzed. Analysis of suitability of developed rubric was empirically tested to 98 students. The result showed validity of rubric using factor analysis is between 0.29 � 0.96, the reliability judgement using Cronbach alfa coefficient is 0.85 for argumentation skill and presentation skill, and 0.86 for problem solving skill and journal analysis.Keywords: authentic; rubric; validity; reliability.","PeriodicalId":33696,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of Learning and Instruction","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE DEVELOPMENT OF AUTHENTIC ASESSMENT RUBRIC FOR ASSESING UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS� LEARNING AND PERFORMANCE\",\"authors\":\"A. Hindriana, I. Setiawati\",\"doi\":\"10.25134/ijli.v1i1.1279\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Learning achievement that is currently being assessed, generally focusing only on cognitive domain, this is certainly contradicting to the term of assessment that should be done in accordance with learning achievement stated in curriculum. Authentic assessment needs right instrument to assess learning achievement. One of the instruments needed is assessment rubric. The rubric that currently been used does not have the same standard, which is not accordance with the principals of assessment. Based on that study, the assessment rubric is developed, consisting four components; job description, scale, dimension, and dimension description. The data was descriptively analyzed. Analysis of suitability of developed rubric was empirically tested to 98 students. The result showed validity of rubric using factor analysis is between 0.29 � 0.96, the reliability judgement using Cronbach alfa coefficient is 0.85 for argumentation skill and presentation skill, and 0.86 for problem solving skill and journal analysis.Keywords: authentic; rubric; validity; reliability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33696,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indonesian Journal of Learning and Instruction\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indonesian Journal of Learning and Instruction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25134/ijli.v1i1.1279\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of Learning and Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25134/ijli.v1i1.1279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目前正在评估的学习成绩,通常只关注认知领域,这肯定与根据课程中规定的学习成绩进行评估的术语相矛盾。真正的评估需要正确的工具来评估学习成绩。所需的工具之一是评估准则。目前使用的准则没有相同的标准,这不符合评估原则。在这项研究的基础上,制定了评估准则,包括四个组成部分;工作描述、比例、尺寸和尺寸描述。对数据进行了描述性分析。对98名学生进行了开发量规的适用性分析。结果表明,采用因子分析的量规的有效性在0.29之间� 0.96,使用Cronbach-alfa系数的可靠性判断对于论证技巧和陈述技巧为0.85,对于问题解决技巧和期刊分析为0.86。关键词:正宗;说明有效性可靠性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
THE DEVELOPMENT OF AUTHENTIC ASESSMENT RUBRIC FOR ASSESING UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS� LEARNING AND PERFORMANCE
Learning achievement that is currently being assessed, generally focusing only on cognitive domain, this is certainly contradicting to the term of assessment that should be done in accordance with learning achievement stated in curriculum. Authentic assessment needs right instrument to assess learning achievement. One of the instruments needed is assessment rubric. The rubric that currently been used does not have the same standard, which is not accordance with the principals of assessment. Based on that study, the assessment rubric is developed, consisting four components; job description, scale, dimension, and dimension description. The data was descriptively analyzed. Analysis of suitability of developed rubric was empirically tested to 98 students. The result showed validity of rubric using factor analysis is between 0.29 � 0.96, the reliability judgement using Cronbach alfa coefficient is 0.85 for argumentation skill and presentation skill, and 0.86 for problem solving skill and journal analysis.Keywords: authentic; rubric; validity; reliability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
ELEVATING LEARNING: DEVELOPING HOTS CHALLENGES FOR SENIOR STUDENTS AT SMK PUI Cikijing EVALUATING COHESION AND COHERENCE IN THESIS INTRODUCTIONS: A THEMATIC PROGRESSION ANALYSIS OF EFL STUDENTS’ TEXTS REVOLUTIONIZING BIOLOGY LEARNING THROUGH AR: THE CASE OF LEAFCAPTURE APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT ENHANCING PEDAGOGICAL COMPETENCIES IN PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS’ THROUGH MICROTEACHING: A QUALITATIVE STUDY BUILDING TRUST IN UNIVERSITY-LEVEL ENGLISH LANGUAGE EDUCATION IN INDONESIA: A MIXED METHODS STUDY
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1