集体影响和权力平衡转移的必要性:复杂性的暗示

IF 0.2 Q4 SOCIAL ISSUES Journal of Social Inclusion Pub Date : 2020-08-10 DOI:10.36251/josi.148
S. Marshall
{"title":"集体影响和权力平衡转移的必要性:复杂性的暗示","authors":"S. Marshall","doi":"10.36251/josi.148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \nThe collective impact approach to achieving greater wellbeing at a population level is grounded in the realisation that that human society and the communities that it comprises of are complex and the insights that complexity science and systems theory bring. This paper examines the approach through the lens of a theoretical framework, grounded in complexity science and systems theory, which was assembled by the author as part of wider research towards a doctoral thesis. Collective impact initiatives are essentially attempts to enhance wellbeing. The theory presented here is focused upon identifying the conditions conducive to enhancing wellbeing in complex human systems. That is the systems that constitutes and individual person or the social settings in which they live their lives. The theory put forward supports the proposition that a key enabling and/or inhibiting factor in the success of change initiatives is the dispositions or habitus, particularly in respect to the management of power in relationships, that are inculcated into people via their life experiences. The implications of this proposition are explored. An example of applying the suggestions which result is shared which is drawn from a case study from the author’s research.","PeriodicalId":42982,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Inclusion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Collective Impact and the Imperative of Shifting the Balance of Power: An Implication of Complexity\",\"authors\":\"S. Marshall\",\"doi\":\"10.36251/josi.148\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\nThe collective impact approach to achieving greater wellbeing at a population level is grounded in the realisation that that human society and the communities that it comprises of are complex and the insights that complexity science and systems theory bring. This paper examines the approach through the lens of a theoretical framework, grounded in complexity science and systems theory, which was assembled by the author as part of wider research towards a doctoral thesis. Collective impact initiatives are essentially attempts to enhance wellbeing. The theory presented here is focused upon identifying the conditions conducive to enhancing wellbeing in complex human systems. That is the systems that constitutes and individual person or the social settings in which they live their lives. The theory put forward supports the proposition that a key enabling and/or inhibiting factor in the success of change initiatives is the dispositions or habitus, particularly in respect to the management of power in relationships, that are inculcated into people via their life experiences. The implications of this proposition are explored. An example of applying the suggestions which result is shared which is drawn from a case study from the author’s research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42982,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Social Inclusion\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Social Inclusion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36251/josi.148\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL ISSUES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Inclusion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36251/josi.148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在人口水平上实现更大福祉的集体影响方法是基于这样一种认识,即人类社会及其组成的社区是复杂的,以及复杂性科学和系统理论带来的见解。本文通过基于复杂性科学和系统理论的理论框架的视角考察了该方法,该框架由作者作为博士论文更广泛研究的一部分组装而成。集体影响倡议本质上是提高福祉的尝试。本文提出的理论侧重于确定有利于提高复杂人类系统幸福感的条件。这是构成个人的系统或者是他们生活的社会环境。所提出的理论支持这样一个命题,即变革举措成功的关键促成和/或抑制因素是性格或习惯,特别是在关系中的权力管理方面,这是通过生活经历灌输给人们的。本文探讨了这一命题的含义。一个应用建议的例子,结果是共享的,这是从作者的研究中得出的一个案例研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Collective Impact and the Imperative of Shifting the Balance of Power: An Implication of Complexity
The collective impact approach to achieving greater wellbeing at a population level is grounded in the realisation that that human society and the communities that it comprises of are complex and the insights that complexity science and systems theory bring. This paper examines the approach through the lens of a theoretical framework, grounded in complexity science and systems theory, which was assembled by the author as part of wider research towards a doctoral thesis. Collective impact initiatives are essentially attempts to enhance wellbeing. The theory presented here is focused upon identifying the conditions conducive to enhancing wellbeing in complex human systems. That is the systems that constitutes and individual person or the social settings in which they live their lives. The theory put forward supports the proposition that a key enabling and/or inhibiting factor in the success of change initiatives is the dispositions or habitus, particularly in respect to the management of power in relationships, that are inculcated into people via their life experiences. The implications of this proposition are explored. An example of applying the suggestions which result is shared which is drawn from a case study from the author’s research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊最新文献
Social Support As an Explanatory Mechanism of the Relationship Between Social Class and Mental Health in University Students: A Structural Mediation Model Loneliness as an unresolved issue in social inclusion programmes Not Leaving ‘Lone Migrant Mothers’ Behind: The Role of Place-based Childcare Support in Australia’s Marginalised Neighbourhoods Embracing or avoiding diversity? Yet another hostile policy against ‘non-Westerners’ in Denmark Like a Social Breath: Homecare’s Contributions to Social Inclusion and Connectedness of Older Adults
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1