由家庭塑造的环境决策:将消费定位于家庭

IF 0.8 4区 社会学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Human Ecology Review Pub Date : 2021-04-12 DOI:10.22459/HER.26.01.2020.10
William Lytle, Chelsea Schelly, Kristin M. Floress, R. Shwom, K. Halvorsen
{"title":"由家庭塑造的环境决策:将消费定位于家庭","authors":"William Lytle, Chelsea Schelly, Kristin M. Floress, R. Shwom, K. Halvorsen","doi":"10.22459/HER.26.01.2020.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research on environmentally consequential human decision-making often begins from the premise that consumption decisions are motivated by individual values. However, we argue that social science research aiming to understand consumer decision-making will benefit from integrating the lived experiences of people in households, where decisions are often influenced or mitigated by the presence of those who share homes. Conducting research on consumption decisions regarding household resources revealed the embedded nature of these decisions, which are situated in the context of the socially contingent dynamics of residential life. In this paper, we identify five social dynamic processes that influence consumption within the household: (1) referring, (2) norming, (3) enhancing, (4) constraining, and (5) allocating. These processes, embedded within the dynamic social relationships of the residential household, moderate household resource use in ways that future social science research may strive to better understand.","PeriodicalId":46896,"journal":{"name":"Human Ecology Review","volume":"26 1","pages":"141-157"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Environmental Decision-Making Shaped by the Home: Situating Consumption in the Household\",\"authors\":\"William Lytle, Chelsea Schelly, Kristin M. Floress, R. Shwom, K. Halvorsen\",\"doi\":\"10.22459/HER.26.01.2020.10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Research on environmentally consequential human decision-making often begins from the premise that consumption decisions are motivated by individual values. However, we argue that social science research aiming to understand consumer decision-making will benefit from integrating the lived experiences of people in households, where decisions are often influenced or mitigated by the presence of those who share homes. Conducting research on consumption decisions regarding household resources revealed the embedded nature of these decisions, which are situated in the context of the socially contingent dynamics of residential life. In this paper, we identify five social dynamic processes that influence consumption within the household: (1) referring, (2) norming, (3) enhancing, (4) constraining, and (5) allocating. These processes, embedded within the dynamic social relationships of the residential household, moderate household resource use in ways that future social science research may strive to better understand.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46896,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Ecology Review\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"141-157\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Ecology Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22459/HER.26.01.2020.10\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Ecology Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22459/HER.26.01.2020.10","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

对环境后果的人类决策的研究通常从消费决策是由个人价值观驱动的前提开始。然而,我们认为,旨在理解消费者决策的社会科学研究将受益于整合家庭中人们的生活经验,在家庭中,决策经常受到共享房屋的人的影响或减轻。对家庭资源消费决策的研究揭示了这些决策的内在性质,这些决策位于居住生活的社会偶然动态背景下。在本文中,我们确定了五个影响家庭消费的社会动态过程:(1)参考,(2)规范,(3)增强,(4)约束,和(5)分配。这些过程嵌入在住宅家庭的动态社会关系中,以未来社会科学研究可能努力更好地理解的方式调节家庭资源的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Environmental Decision-Making Shaped by the Home: Situating Consumption in the Household
Research on environmentally consequential human decision-making often begins from the premise that consumption decisions are motivated by individual values. However, we argue that social science research aiming to understand consumer decision-making will benefit from integrating the lived experiences of people in households, where decisions are often influenced or mitigated by the presence of those who share homes. Conducting research on consumption decisions regarding household resources revealed the embedded nature of these decisions, which are situated in the context of the socially contingent dynamics of residential life. In this paper, we identify five social dynamic processes that influence consumption within the household: (1) referring, (2) norming, (3) enhancing, (4) constraining, and (5) allocating. These processes, embedded within the dynamic social relationships of the residential household, moderate household resource use in ways that future social science research may strive to better understand.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Human Ecology Review (ISSN 1074-4827) is a refereed journal published twice a year by the Society for Human Ecology. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed research and theory on the interaction between humans and the environment and other links between culture and nature (Research in Human Ecology), essays and applications relevant to human ecology (Human Ecology Forum), book reviews (Contemporary Human Ecology), and relevant commentary, announcements, and awards (Human Ecology Bulletin).
期刊最新文献
Applicability of the Value–Belief–Norm Model to the Protection of Native Biodiversity in a District of Santiago, Chile Using Human Ecology and Feedback-Guided Analysis to Understand the Relationship Between Ecotourism and Poaching Association of Physical and Sociocultural Aspects of Adolescent Athletes with Sport Development: A Review Lyme Disease Risk Perceptions in New Hampshire, USA: Bridging Regression and Qualitative Comparative Analysis Influence of Socioeconomic Factors on the Knowledge of Medicinal Plants: A Case Study in the Truká Indigenous Population, Pernambuco, Brazil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1