{"title":"彼得·劳勒,公共思想家","authors":"Yuval Levin","doi":"10.1080/10457097.2022.2085982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The late Peter Lawler devoted a great deal of time and effort to public writing—work drawing on his deep knowledge and professional academic expertise but intended to shed light on events of the day for a wide, nonacademic readership. The purpose of that work was highly unusual: Lawler sought not so much to bring the tools of elite academic criticism to bear on the public situation as to bring the common sense of American culture (albeit refined and elevated through a learned Christian sensibility) to bear on the thought and behavior of American elites. If Lawler could be called a public intellectual, it is because he was an intellectual thinking on behalf of the public, and in ways that take seriously both the enormous benefits and the fundamentally tragic character of modern life. There is great value in such public writing, and Lawler offered an exceptional example of the kinds of virtues it involves.","PeriodicalId":55874,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Political Science","volume":"51 1","pages":"149 - 154"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Peter Lawler, Public Thinker\",\"authors\":\"Yuval Levin\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10457097.2022.2085982\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The late Peter Lawler devoted a great deal of time and effort to public writing—work drawing on his deep knowledge and professional academic expertise but intended to shed light on events of the day for a wide, nonacademic readership. The purpose of that work was highly unusual: Lawler sought not so much to bring the tools of elite academic criticism to bear on the public situation as to bring the common sense of American culture (albeit refined and elevated through a learned Christian sensibility) to bear on the thought and behavior of American elites. If Lawler could be called a public intellectual, it is because he was an intellectual thinking on behalf of the public, and in ways that take seriously both the enormous benefits and the fundamentally tragic character of modern life. There is great value in such public writing, and Lawler offered an exceptional example of the kinds of virtues it involves.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55874,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perspectives on Political Science\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"149 - 154\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perspectives on Political Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10457097.2022.2085982\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives on Political Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10457097.2022.2085982","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract The late Peter Lawler devoted a great deal of time and effort to public writing—work drawing on his deep knowledge and professional academic expertise but intended to shed light on events of the day for a wide, nonacademic readership. The purpose of that work was highly unusual: Lawler sought not so much to bring the tools of elite academic criticism to bear on the public situation as to bring the common sense of American culture (albeit refined and elevated through a learned Christian sensibility) to bear on the thought and behavior of American elites. If Lawler could be called a public intellectual, it is because he was an intellectual thinking on behalf of the public, and in ways that take seriously both the enormous benefits and the fundamentally tragic character of modern life. There is great value in such public writing, and Lawler offered an exceptional example of the kinds of virtues it involves.
期刊介绍:
Whether discussing Montaigne"s case for tolerance or Nietzsche"s political critique of modern science, Perspectives on Political Science links contemporary politics and culture to the enduring questions posed by great thinkers from antiquity to the present. Ideas are the lifeblood of the journal, which comprises articles, symposia, and book reviews. Recent articles address the writings of Aristotle, Adam Smith, and Plutarch; the movies No Country for Old Men and 3:10 to Yuma; and the role of humility in modern political thought.