中国职务犯罪羁押中的辩护权——打击腐败与人权的平衡观

Zihang Lan, Xiao Wang, Yanru Yan
{"title":"中国职务犯罪羁押中的辩护权——打击腐败与人权的平衡观","authors":"Zihang Lan, Xiao Wang, Yanru Yan","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v16n4p1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In accordance with the Supervision Law of China, the duration of detention for the purpose of investigating duty-related offences may extend for a maximum term of six months. In contrast to the provisions of Criminal Procedure Law, it should be noted that individuals who are detained for duty crimes do not possess the right to counsel. The issue of whether suspects should be granted the right to counsel under the Supervision Law, and how to effectively balance the objectives of eliminating corruption and protecting human rights, remains unaddressed. This paper presents the contention that lawyers’ intervention in the process of detention should be permitted, as the obstacles associated with lawyers for the purpose of combating corruption can be addressed, however, the violation of human rights resulting from the absence of such engagement cannot be adequately rectified. Simultaneously, this study posits that right to counsel is not without limitations. The supervisory organs possess the authority to restrict the right to counsel in the four statutory instances, based on persuasive justifications.","PeriodicalId":90619,"journal":{"name":"Journal of politics and law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Right to Counsel during Detention for Duty Crimes in China –A Balanced View of Corruption Combating and Human Rights\",\"authors\":\"Zihang Lan, Xiao Wang, Yanru Yan\",\"doi\":\"10.5539/jpl.v16n4p1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In accordance with the Supervision Law of China, the duration of detention for the purpose of investigating duty-related offences may extend for a maximum term of six months. In contrast to the provisions of Criminal Procedure Law, it should be noted that individuals who are detained for duty crimes do not possess the right to counsel. The issue of whether suspects should be granted the right to counsel under the Supervision Law, and how to effectively balance the objectives of eliminating corruption and protecting human rights, remains unaddressed. This paper presents the contention that lawyers’ intervention in the process of detention should be permitted, as the obstacles associated with lawyers for the purpose of combating corruption can be addressed, however, the violation of human rights resulting from the absence of such engagement cannot be adequately rectified. Simultaneously, this study posits that right to counsel is not without limitations. The supervisory organs possess the authority to restrict the right to counsel in the four statutory instances, based on persuasive justifications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90619,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of politics and law\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of politics and law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5539/jpl.v16n4p1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of politics and law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5539/jpl.v16n4p1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据中国监察法,为调查职务违法行为而拘留的期限最长可延长6个月。与《刑事诉讼法》的规定相反,应当指出,因职务犯罪而被拘留的个人不享有请律师的权利。是否应根据《监察法》给予犯罪嫌疑人律师权利,以及如何有效地平衡消除腐败和保护人权的目标,这些问题仍然没有得到解决。本文提出的论点是,应该允许律师干预拘留过程,因为可以解决与律师有关的打击腐败的障碍,但是,由于缺乏这种参与而导致的侵犯人权的行为无法得到充分纠正。同时,本研究假定获得咨询的权利并非没有限制。在这四种法定情况下,监察机关有权根据有说服力的理由限制辩护权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Right to Counsel during Detention for Duty Crimes in China –A Balanced View of Corruption Combating and Human Rights
In accordance with the Supervision Law of China, the duration of detention for the purpose of investigating duty-related offences may extend for a maximum term of six months. In contrast to the provisions of Criminal Procedure Law, it should be noted that individuals who are detained for duty crimes do not possess the right to counsel. The issue of whether suspects should be granted the right to counsel under the Supervision Law, and how to effectively balance the objectives of eliminating corruption and protecting human rights, remains unaddressed. This paper presents the contention that lawyers’ intervention in the process of detention should be permitted, as the obstacles associated with lawyers for the purpose of combating corruption can be addressed, however, the violation of human rights resulting from the absence of such engagement cannot be adequately rectified. Simultaneously, this study posits that right to counsel is not without limitations. The supervisory organs possess the authority to restrict the right to counsel in the four statutory instances, based on persuasive justifications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Examination of Political Patronage and Maladministration on State-Owned Entities with Specific Reference to South African Airways: A Literature Study Integration Process in Central Asia: The Interaction of Nationalism and Regionalism Majority Voting – A Critique Preferential Decision-Making – An Alternative Contrariness of Laws in Contractual Obligations and the Role of the Will in Determining the Applicable Law in the Jordanian Civil Law Ghana's Legal Framework for the Constitutional and Statutory Application of Arbitration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1