我们和мысвами(“我们与你同在”):减少1的人称代词使用中的模糊性的策略。德语和俄语诊断沟通和治疗计划讨论中的人称复数

IF 0.5 4区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GERMANISTISCHE LINGUISTIK Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.1515/zgl-2023-2003
Irina Mostovaia, Victoria Fedorovskaya, Wolfgang Imo
{"title":"我们和мысвами(“我们与你同在”):减少1的人称代词使用中的模糊性的策略。德语和俄语诊断沟通和治疗计划讨论中的人称复数","authors":"Irina Mostovaia, Victoria Fedorovskaya, Wolfgang Imo","doi":"10.1515/zgl-2023-2003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper examines the strategies doctors use to disambiguate the referential scope of the personal pronoun we. In clinical practice, doctors have to manage the different roles in which they can interact with the patients, – as individuals, as representatives of their clinic or their clinical department or as members of the scientific community of medical experts. These different roles also combine with different degrees of agentivity and responsibility. Patients therefore have to decode whether they are included into the we or not. Based on a corpus of more than 90 therapy planning talks recorded at German and Russian oncological clinical departments, our empirical study analyzes which strategies doctors employ to locally clarify the range of we, e. g., by adding a numeral (we two) or a locative phrase (we in this clinic) in order to ensure mutual understanding.","PeriodicalId":43090,"journal":{"name":"ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GERMANISTISCHE LINGUISTIK","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wir beide und мы с вами (‚wir mit Ihnen‘): Strategien zur Vagheitsreduktion im Gebrauch des Personalpronomens der 1. Person Plural in deutschen und russischen Diagnosemitteilungs- und Therapieplanungsgesprächen\",\"authors\":\"Irina Mostovaia, Victoria Fedorovskaya, Wolfgang Imo\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/zgl-2023-2003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This paper examines the strategies doctors use to disambiguate the referential scope of the personal pronoun we. In clinical practice, doctors have to manage the different roles in which they can interact with the patients, – as individuals, as representatives of their clinic or their clinical department or as members of the scientific community of medical experts. These different roles also combine with different degrees of agentivity and responsibility. Patients therefore have to decode whether they are included into the we or not. Based on a corpus of more than 90 therapy planning talks recorded at German and Russian oncological clinical departments, our empirical study analyzes which strategies doctors employ to locally clarify the range of we, e. g., by adding a numeral (we two) or a locative phrase (we in this clinic) in order to ensure mutual understanding.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43090,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GERMANISTISCHE LINGUISTIK\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GERMANISTISCHE LINGUISTIK\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/zgl-2023-2003\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GERMANISTISCHE LINGUISTIK","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/zgl-2023-2003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文探讨了医生在消除人称代词we的指称范围歧义时所使用的策略。在临床实践中,医生必须管理他们可以与患者互动的不同角色——作为个人、诊所或临床部门的代表或医学专家科学界的成员。这些不同的角色也结合了不同程度的代理性和责任性。因此,患者必须解码他们是否被纳入we。基于在德国和俄罗斯肿瘤学临床部门记录的90多个治疗计划谈话的语料库,我们的实证研究分析了医生采用哪些策略来局部澄清我们的范围。 g.通过添加一个数字(we two)或一个方位短语(we in this clinic)来确保相互理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Wir beide und мы с вами (‚wir mit Ihnen‘): Strategien zur Vagheitsreduktion im Gebrauch des Personalpronomens der 1. Person Plural in deutschen und russischen Diagnosemitteilungs- und Therapieplanungsgesprächen
Abstract This paper examines the strategies doctors use to disambiguate the referential scope of the personal pronoun we. In clinical practice, doctors have to manage the different roles in which they can interact with the patients, – as individuals, as representatives of their clinic or their clinical department or as members of the scientific community of medical experts. These different roles also combine with different degrees of agentivity and responsibility. Patients therefore have to decode whether they are included into the we or not. Based on a corpus of more than 90 therapy planning talks recorded at German and Russian oncological clinical departments, our empirical study analyzes which strategies doctors employ to locally clarify the range of we, e. g., by adding a numeral (we two) or a locative phrase (we in this clinic) in order to ensure mutual understanding.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
50.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: The subject area of the ZEITSCHRIFT FÜR GERMANISTISCHE LINGUISTIK (ZGL) is the German language of the present as well as the history of the German language in all its differentiations. The main focus of the journal is on the standard language of today. The ZGL publishes articles, discussions, and reports on the most important developments in the field, as well as review articles of selected books. The annual list of newly published books ("Neue Bücher") and the journal exhibit ("Zeitschriftenschau") of approx. 80 international journals support the integration of the field of German linguistics.
期刊最新文献
Intradisziplinäre Integration durch inhaltliche Breite: Zum 50-jährigen Jubiläum der Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik (ZGL) Die ZGL aus französischer Perspektive: Öffnung und neue Impulse ja, aber nicht um jeden Preis! Auf Deutsch übers Deutsche und Vielfalt? Zum 50jährigen Jubiläum der ZGL. Oder: Warum die ZGL unverzichtbar ist Die Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik (ZGL) aus der Perspektive von DaF/DaZ
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1