粪便微生物群移植用于抗生素耐药菌的去定殖

Q1 Medicine Human Microbiome Journal Pub Date : 2020-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.humic.2020.100071
Sophie Amrane, Jean-Christophe Lagier
{"title":"粪便微生物群移植用于抗生素耐药菌的去定殖","authors":"Sophie Amrane,&nbsp;Jean-Christophe Lagier","doi":"10.1016/j.humic.2020.100071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Patients colonized with antibiotic resistant bacteria are at risk of infections and spontaneous decolonization delays are highly variable between patients. The management of these patients is therefore time-consuming; requires patient isolation, and cohort policies. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has been used with the aim of shortening this gut colonization. Here, we proposed a comprehensive literature review on FMT utilization for gut antibiotics resistant bacteria decolonization. After literature research through Pubmed indexed for MEDLINE, we analyzed 23 studies with description of FMT utilization and analyze of gut decolonization. In total, the data involved 197 patients, 153 of whom underwent FMT. Overall, 66.7% (102/153) of the patients were decolonized after FMT. However, we noticed a lot of interpretation bias, such as variation in colonization definition and high disparities in FMT administration modalities. Two disparities were of special interest: repeated FMT seems to increase the effectiveness of decolonization, and gut decolonization with antibiotics before FMT was proposed by some authors, but with too few studies to draw a conclusion. Overall, the use of FMT is a promising perspective for intestinal decolonization, but it requires greater standardization.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37790,"journal":{"name":"Human Microbiome Journal","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100071"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.humic.2020.100071","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fecal microbiota transplantation for antibiotic resistant bacteria decolonization\",\"authors\":\"Sophie Amrane,&nbsp;Jean-Christophe Lagier\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.humic.2020.100071\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Patients colonized with antibiotic resistant bacteria are at risk of infections and spontaneous decolonization delays are highly variable between patients. The management of these patients is therefore time-consuming; requires patient isolation, and cohort policies. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has been used with the aim of shortening this gut colonization. Here, we proposed a comprehensive literature review on FMT utilization for gut antibiotics resistant bacteria decolonization. After literature research through Pubmed indexed for MEDLINE, we analyzed 23 studies with description of FMT utilization and analyze of gut decolonization. In total, the data involved 197 patients, 153 of whom underwent FMT. Overall, 66.7% (102/153) of the patients were decolonized after FMT. However, we noticed a lot of interpretation bias, such as variation in colonization definition and high disparities in FMT administration modalities. Two disparities were of special interest: repeated FMT seems to increase the effectiveness of decolonization, and gut decolonization with antibiotics before FMT was proposed by some authors, but with too few studies to draw a conclusion. Overall, the use of FMT is a promising perspective for intestinal decolonization, but it requires greater standardization.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37790,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Microbiome Journal\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100071\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.humic.2020.100071\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Microbiome Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452231720300026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Microbiome Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452231720300026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

被抗生素耐药细菌定植的患者有感染的风险,而自发的去定植延迟在患者之间是高度可变的。因此,对这些患者的管理非常耗时;需要患者隔离和队列政策。粪便微生物群移植(FMT)已被用于缩短这种肠道定植的目的。在此,我们对FMT在肠道抗生素耐药菌去菌落中的应用进行了全面的文献综述。通过Pubmed检索MEDLINE进行文献研究,我们分析了23项研究,描述了FMT利用情况并分析了肠道去殖民化。数据共涉及197例患者,其中153例接受了FMT。总体而言,66.7%(102/153)的患者在FMT后去菌落。然而,我们注意到许多解释偏差,例如定殖定义的差异和FMT给药方式的高度差异。两个差异值得特别关注:重复FMT似乎增加了去菌落的有效性,而在FMT之前抗生素的肠道去菌落被一些作者提出,但研究太少,无法得出结论。总的来说,FMT的使用是肠道去菌落的一个有希望的前景,但它需要更大的标准化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Fecal microbiota transplantation for antibiotic resistant bacteria decolonization

Patients colonized with antibiotic resistant bacteria are at risk of infections and spontaneous decolonization delays are highly variable between patients. The management of these patients is therefore time-consuming; requires patient isolation, and cohort policies. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has been used with the aim of shortening this gut colonization. Here, we proposed a comprehensive literature review on FMT utilization for gut antibiotics resistant bacteria decolonization. After literature research through Pubmed indexed for MEDLINE, we analyzed 23 studies with description of FMT utilization and analyze of gut decolonization. In total, the data involved 197 patients, 153 of whom underwent FMT. Overall, 66.7% (102/153) of the patients were decolonized after FMT. However, we noticed a lot of interpretation bias, such as variation in colonization definition and high disparities in FMT administration modalities. Two disparities were of special interest: repeated FMT seems to increase the effectiveness of decolonization, and gut decolonization with antibiotics before FMT was proposed by some authors, but with too few studies to draw a conclusion. Overall, the use of FMT is a promising perspective for intestinal decolonization, but it requires greater standardization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Human Microbiome Journal
Human Microbiome Journal Medicine-Infectious Diseases
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The innumerable microbes living in and on our bodies are known to affect human wellbeing, but our knowledge of their role is still at the very early stages of understanding. Human Microbiome is a new open access journal dedicated to research on the impact of the microbiome on human health and disease. The journal will publish original research, reviews, comments, human microbe descriptions and genome, and letters. Topics covered will include: the repertoire of human-associated microbes, therapeutic intervention, pathophysiology, experimental models, physiological, geographical, and pathological changes, and technical reports; genomic, metabolomic, transcriptomic, and culturomic approaches are welcome.
期刊最新文献
The Human Gut Microbiota and Gastrointestinal Cancer: Current Status and Therapeutic Perspectives Modern Perspectives in Controlling Human Diseases through Probiotic Intervention Oral Microbiome: An Opening to Healthy Possibilities Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis in Neurological Disorders Emerging Role of Gut Microbiota in Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1