{"title":"战争对象:越南战争中种族和凝固汽油弹的基础设施","authors":"Keva X. Bui","doi":"10.1080/00447471.2021.2021775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article examines napalm as an epistemology of U.S militarism, developing the framework of “objects of warfare” to describe political relations intertwined with racialized personhood and militarized objecthood. The first half traces the racial logics of infrastructural warfare in the Vietnam War, while the second situates the construction of Asian racial form via liberal humanism within cultural representations of napalm in the war’s afterlives. By examining the interrelatedness of napalm’s physical violence and its political effects, this article suggests objects of warfare offer a framework to trace links between militarized objecthood and the lingering specters of Cold War liberalism and imperialism.","PeriodicalId":44285,"journal":{"name":"AMERASIA JOURNAL","volume":"47 1","pages":"299 - 313"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Objects of Warfare: Infrastructures of Race and Napalm in the Vietnam War\",\"authors\":\"Keva X. Bui\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00447471.2021.2021775\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article examines napalm as an epistemology of U.S militarism, developing the framework of “objects of warfare” to describe political relations intertwined with racialized personhood and militarized objecthood. The first half traces the racial logics of infrastructural warfare in the Vietnam War, while the second situates the construction of Asian racial form via liberal humanism within cultural representations of napalm in the war’s afterlives. By examining the interrelatedness of napalm’s physical violence and its political effects, this article suggests objects of warfare offer a framework to trace links between militarized objecthood and the lingering specters of Cold War liberalism and imperialism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44285,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AMERASIA JOURNAL\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"299 - 313\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AMERASIA JOURNAL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00447471.2021.2021775\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMERASIA JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00447471.2021.2021775","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Objects of Warfare: Infrastructures of Race and Napalm in the Vietnam War
ABSTRACT This article examines napalm as an epistemology of U.S militarism, developing the framework of “objects of warfare” to describe political relations intertwined with racialized personhood and militarized objecthood. The first half traces the racial logics of infrastructural warfare in the Vietnam War, while the second situates the construction of Asian racial form via liberal humanism within cultural representations of napalm in the war’s afterlives. By examining the interrelatedness of napalm’s physical violence and its political effects, this article suggests objects of warfare offer a framework to trace links between militarized objecthood and the lingering specters of Cold War liberalism and imperialism.
期刊介绍:
Since 1971, the Press has published Amerasia Journal, the leading interdisciplinary journal in Asian American Studies. After more than three decades and over 16,000 pages, Amerasia Journal has played an indispensable role in establishing Asian American Studies as a viable and relevant field of scholarship, teaching, community service, and public discourse.