约旦哈希姆政权的合法性问题:伊斯兰激进组织、西部领土和以色列

Q1 Arts and Humanities Oriente Moderno Pub Date : 2020-06-18 DOI:10.1163/22138617-12340228
Ronen Yitzhak
{"title":"约旦哈希姆政权的合法性问题:伊斯兰激进组织、西部领土和以色列","authors":"Ronen Yitzhak","doi":"10.1163/22138617-12340228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis article explores the question of the legitimacy of the Hashemite regime in Jordan. Jordanian public opinion, on the one hand, recognizes the regime, in large part because of its genealogical descent from the Prophet Muhammad. Radical Islamic organizations, on the other hand, reject it for its ties to the West and Israel. The article examines how the views of Islamic movements towards the Hashemite regime have evolved. The Muslim Brotherhood originally recognized the legitimacy of the Hashemite regime, but changed that position in response to Jordan’s 1994 peace treaty with Israel. al-Qāʿidah and ISIS have never recognized Hashemite rule as legitimate. They have tried to undermine its political stability and, indeed, to overthrow it, rejecting its secularism and cooperation with Israel and the West.\nThe terrorist organizations al-Qāʿidah and ISIS find support and sympathy among Jordanians, but as they committed more terrorist attacks, the Jordanian public has turned away from them and its support for the Hashemite regime has grown. The Hashemite regime thus remains stable and strong and enjoys legitimacy in the eyes of the majority of Jordanians.","PeriodicalId":35837,"journal":{"name":"Oriente Moderno","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/22138617-12340228","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Question of the Legitimacy of the Hashemite Regime in Jordan: the Islamic Radical Organizations, the Western Territories and Israel\",\"authors\":\"Ronen Yitzhak\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/22138617-12340228\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nThis article explores the question of the legitimacy of the Hashemite regime in Jordan. Jordanian public opinion, on the one hand, recognizes the regime, in large part because of its genealogical descent from the Prophet Muhammad. Radical Islamic organizations, on the other hand, reject it for its ties to the West and Israel. The article examines how the views of Islamic movements towards the Hashemite regime have evolved. The Muslim Brotherhood originally recognized the legitimacy of the Hashemite regime, but changed that position in response to Jordan’s 1994 peace treaty with Israel. al-Qāʿidah and ISIS have never recognized Hashemite rule as legitimate. They have tried to undermine its political stability and, indeed, to overthrow it, rejecting its secularism and cooperation with Israel and the West.\\nThe terrorist organizations al-Qāʿidah and ISIS find support and sympathy among Jordanians, but as they committed more terrorist attacks, the Jordanian public has turned away from them and its support for the Hashemite regime has grown. The Hashemite regime thus remains stable and strong and enjoys legitimacy in the eyes of the majority of Jordanians.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35837,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oriente Moderno\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/22138617-12340228\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oriente Moderno\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/22138617-12340228\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oriente Moderno","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/22138617-12340228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文探讨约旦哈希姆政权的合法性问题。一方面,约旦公众舆论承认该政权,很大程度上是因为其家谱来源于先知穆罕默德。另一方面,激进的伊斯兰组织因其与西方和以色列的关系而拒绝接受它。这篇文章探讨了伊斯兰运动对哈希姆政权的看法是如何演变的。穆斯林兄弟会最初承认哈希姆政权的合法性,但为了回应约旦1994年与以色列签订的和平条约,改变了这一立场。基地组织和伊斯兰国从未承认哈希姆统治是合法的。他们试图破坏约旦的政治稳定,甚至推翻约旦,拒绝其世俗主义以及与以色列和西方的合作。恐怖组织al-Qāidah和ISIS在约旦人中得到了支持和同情,但随着他们犯下更多恐怖袭击,约旦公众已经远离他们,对哈希姆政权的支持也在增加。因此,哈希姆政权保持稳定和强大,在大多数约旦人眼中享有合法性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Question of the Legitimacy of the Hashemite Regime in Jordan: the Islamic Radical Organizations, the Western Territories and Israel
This article explores the question of the legitimacy of the Hashemite regime in Jordan. Jordanian public opinion, on the one hand, recognizes the regime, in large part because of its genealogical descent from the Prophet Muhammad. Radical Islamic organizations, on the other hand, reject it for its ties to the West and Israel. The article examines how the views of Islamic movements towards the Hashemite regime have evolved. The Muslim Brotherhood originally recognized the legitimacy of the Hashemite regime, but changed that position in response to Jordan’s 1994 peace treaty with Israel. al-Qāʿidah and ISIS have never recognized Hashemite rule as legitimate. They have tried to undermine its political stability and, indeed, to overthrow it, rejecting its secularism and cooperation with Israel and the West. The terrorist organizations al-Qāʿidah and ISIS find support and sympathy among Jordanians, but as they committed more terrorist attacks, the Jordanian public has turned away from them and its support for the Hashemite regime has grown. The Hashemite regime thus remains stable and strong and enjoys legitimacy in the eyes of the majority of Jordanians.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Oriente Moderno
Oriente Moderno Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
Prophets, Gods and Kings in Sīrat Sayf ibn Dhī Yazan. An Intertextual Reading of an Egyptian Popular Epic, written by Blatherwick, Helen Principles of Ritual Prayer: An 18th Century Catechism in Bahdini Kurdish Panj ganj. I cinque tesori di Neẓāmi Ganjavi della Fondazione Giorgio Cini, edited by Daniela Meneghini e Alessandro Martoni Alcune considerazioni intorno al dibattito storiografico sulla Siria contemporanea Visualizing Sufism. Studies on Graphic Representations in Sufi Literature (13th to 16th Century), edited by Giovanni Maria Martini
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1