世界观的复杂性:交叉的多样性概念化多样性的挑战

IF 1 3区 哲学 0 RELIGION Social Compass Pub Date : 2022-03-28 DOI:10.1177/00377686221079685
G. Bouma, Anna Halafoff, G. Barton
{"title":"世界观的复杂性:交叉的多样性概念化多样性的挑战","authors":"G. Bouma, Anna Halafoff, G. Barton","doi":"10.1177/00377686221079685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social science analysis of diversity, and religious diversity in particular, has long struggled to move beyond simple binaries of religious-secular, religious-spiritual, traditional-modern, global north-global south, and so on. Twenty-first century realities test existing terms and find them wanting. While concepts such as the postsecular, multiple modernities, multiple secularities, and non-religion point to new lines of analysis, each still refers to binary and thereby limiting terms. This article reviews research on religious diversity, delineating some of the major challenges posed. Building on useful frameworks of superdiversity, multiple pluralities, and religious complexity, we argue that the more widely encompassing concept of worldview complexity might represent a better way forward. It has the advantage of acknowledging the intersecting diversity of diversities in multiple, differing contexts, and abiding similarities in what is occurring ‘beneath religion’.","PeriodicalId":46442,"journal":{"name":"Social Compass","volume":"69 1","pages":"186 - 204"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Worldview complexity: The challenge of intersecting diversities for conceptualising diversity\",\"authors\":\"G. Bouma, Anna Halafoff, G. Barton\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00377686221079685\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Social science analysis of diversity, and religious diversity in particular, has long struggled to move beyond simple binaries of religious-secular, religious-spiritual, traditional-modern, global north-global south, and so on. Twenty-first century realities test existing terms and find them wanting. While concepts such as the postsecular, multiple modernities, multiple secularities, and non-religion point to new lines of analysis, each still refers to binary and thereby limiting terms. This article reviews research on religious diversity, delineating some of the major challenges posed. Building on useful frameworks of superdiversity, multiple pluralities, and religious complexity, we argue that the more widely encompassing concept of worldview complexity might represent a better way forward. It has the advantage of acknowledging the intersecting diversity of diversities in multiple, differing contexts, and abiding similarities in what is occurring ‘beneath religion’.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46442,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Compass\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"186 - 204\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Compass\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00377686221079685\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Compass","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00377686221079685","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

长期以来,社会科学对多样性,尤其是宗教多样性的分析一直在努力超越宗教世俗、宗教精神、传统现代、全球北全球南等简单的二元对立。21世纪的现实考验着现有的术语,并发现它们不足。虽然后世俗、多重现代化、多重世俗和非宗教等概念指向了新的分析路线,但每一个概念仍然指的是二元的,从而限制了术语。这篇文章回顾了对宗教多样性的研究,描述了所带来的一些主要挑战。基于超多样性、多元性和宗教复杂性的有用框架,我们认为,更广泛的世界观复杂性概念可能代表着更好的前进方向。它的优点是承认在多种不同的背景下多样性的交叉多样性,以及“宗教之下”发生的事情的持久相似性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Worldview complexity: The challenge of intersecting diversities for conceptualising diversity
Social science analysis of diversity, and religious diversity in particular, has long struggled to move beyond simple binaries of religious-secular, religious-spiritual, traditional-modern, global north-global south, and so on. Twenty-first century realities test existing terms and find them wanting. While concepts such as the postsecular, multiple modernities, multiple secularities, and non-religion point to new lines of analysis, each still refers to binary and thereby limiting terms. This article reviews research on religious diversity, delineating some of the major challenges posed. Building on useful frameworks of superdiversity, multiple pluralities, and religious complexity, we argue that the more widely encompassing concept of worldview complexity might represent a better way forward. It has the advantage of acknowledging the intersecting diversity of diversities in multiple, differing contexts, and abiding similarities in what is occurring ‘beneath religion’.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Social Compass
Social Compass Multiple-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Social Compass is a fully peer reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles on the sociology of religion. It aims to reflect the wide variety of research being carried out by sociologists of religion in all countries. Part of each issue consists of invited articles on a particular theme; for the unthemed part of the journal, articles will be considered on any topic that bears upon religion in contemporary societies. Issue 2 each year contains selected papers from the biennial conferences of the International Society for the Sociology of Religion (ISSR). Readers are also invited to contribute to the Forum section.
期刊最新文献
Christianity and reverential naturalism engage a world in peril: A dialogue between disciplines. The New Age and the awakening of a decolonial consciousness from Mexico Spiritualizing psychiatry: Transpersonal psychology, DSM, and Brazilian research about spirituality Les jeunes, cœurs de cible et promoteurs d’une orthodoxie juive globalisée Les politiques subtiles du faire autrement: Référents spirituels et militantisme progressiste en Suisse
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1