欧盟和美国协议下的乘客姓名记录数据保护:隐私之上的安全?

Q3 Social Sciences Hasanuddin Law Review Pub Date : 2022-07-30 DOI:10.20956/halrev.v8i2.2844
Rizaldy Anggriawan, A. Salim, Yordan Gunawan, Mohammad Hazyar Arumbinang
{"title":"欧盟和美国协议下的乘客姓名记录数据保护:隐私之上的安全?","authors":"Rizaldy Anggriawan, A. Salim, Yordan Gunawan, Mohammad Hazyar Arumbinang","doi":"10.20956/halrev.v8i2.2844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Privacy should become a key component in the IT system. It is not something to be considered at last but from the very early stages. Almost no nation has a greater sense of personal data security which could be equivalent to the European level. Since 9/11, the United States has declared to utilize PNR as a method for combating terrorism by associating PNR data with criminal records. Nevertheless, in fact, the majority of data found in the PNR is immense and most of this data is of a confidential nature. The paper used doctrinal legal research methodology utilizing the case and comparative law approach. It elaborates particular cases in relation to data protection issues. It also explores the differences between EU and US law which hinder the idea of data protection in particular on PNR. The study revealed that security is one of the most critical issues which hinder the agreement between the EU and the US on PNR data protection. As the EU promotes the highest standard to the data protection referring to the European community history and GDPR provisions, while the US places national security as a main priority beyond the privacy issues.","PeriodicalId":30743,"journal":{"name":"Hasanuddin Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Passenger Name Record Data Protection under European Union and United States Agreement: Security over Privacy?\",\"authors\":\"Rizaldy Anggriawan, A. Salim, Yordan Gunawan, Mohammad Hazyar Arumbinang\",\"doi\":\"10.20956/halrev.v8i2.2844\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Privacy should become a key component in the IT system. It is not something to be considered at last but from the very early stages. Almost no nation has a greater sense of personal data security which could be equivalent to the European level. Since 9/11, the United States has declared to utilize PNR as a method for combating terrorism by associating PNR data with criminal records. Nevertheless, in fact, the majority of data found in the PNR is immense and most of this data is of a confidential nature. The paper used doctrinal legal research methodology utilizing the case and comparative law approach. It elaborates particular cases in relation to data protection issues. It also explores the differences between EU and US law which hinder the idea of data protection in particular on PNR. The study revealed that security is one of the most critical issues which hinder the agreement between the EU and the US on PNR data protection. As the EU promotes the highest standard to the data protection referring to the European community history and GDPR provisions, while the US places national security as a main priority beyond the privacy issues.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30743,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hasanuddin Law Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hasanuddin Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v8i2.2844\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hasanuddin Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v8i2.2844","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

隐私应该成为IT系统的关键组成部分。这不是最后要考虑的事情,而是从早期阶段开始考虑的事情。几乎没有哪个国家的个人数据安全意识能达到欧洲的水平。自9/11以来,美国已宣布将PNR数据与犯罪记录联系起来,作为打击恐怖主义的一种方法。然而,事实上,在PNR中发现的大多数数据都是巨大的,而且大多数数据都具有机密性。本文采用理论法学研究方法,运用案例和比较法方法。它详细阐述了与数据保护问题有关的具体案例。它还探讨了欧盟和美国法律之间的差异,这些差异阻碍了数据保护的想法,特别是在PNR上。该研究显示,安全是阻碍欧盟和美国就PNR数据保护达成协议的最关键问题之一。欧盟参照欧共体历史和GDPR规定,对数据保护推崇最高标准,而美国则将国家安全置于隐私问题之上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Passenger Name Record Data Protection under European Union and United States Agreement: Security over Privacy?
Privacy should become a key component in the IT system. It is not something to be considered at last but from the very early stages. Almost no nation has a greater sense of personal data security which could be equivalent to the European level. Since 9/11, the United States has declared to utilize PNR as a method for combating terrorism by associating PNR data with criminal records. Nevertheless, in fact, the majority of data found in the PNR is immense and most of this data is of a confidential nature. The paper used doctrinal legal research methodology utilizing the case and comparative law approach. It elaborates particular cases in relation to data protection issues. It also explores the differences between EU and US law which hinder the idea of data protection in particular on PNR. The study revealed that security is one of the most critical issues which hinder the agreement between the EU and the US on PNR data protection. As the EU promotes the highest standard to the data protection referring to the European community history and GDPR provisions, while the US places national security as a main priority beyond the privacy issues.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hasanuddin Law Review
Hasanuddin Law Review Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Armed Conflict under International Law Artificial Intelligence and Administrative Justice: An Analysis of Predictive Justice in France Strengthening National Regulations in Combating Cross-Border Trafficking: Empirical Approach and the Way Forward Navigating Ambiguity: Critiques of Indonesia's Health Law and its Impact on Legal Redress for Medical Malpractice Victims The Constitutionality of Inheritance Rights for Extramarital Children: Assessing the Legal Response under Balinese Customary Law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1