Y. Yokoyama, S. Emoto, H. Nozawa, K. Kawai, K. Sasaki, K. Murono, Rei Ishibashi, K. Koike, S. Ishihara
{"title":"腹腔镜下自扩支架置入术治疗梗阻性左癌症的临床病理特征及疗效","authors":"Y. Yokoyama, S. Emoto, H. Nozawa, K. Kawai, K. Sasaki, K. Murono, Rei Ishibashi, K. Koike, S. Ishihara","doi":"10.1177/14574969221096191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and objective: Laparoscopic resection for obstructive colon cancer (CC) after insertion of self-expanding metallic stents (SEMSs) is reportedly difficult. However, this has not yet been thoroughly investigated. Therefore, we investigated the influence of SEMS insertion on laparoscopic resection. Methods: This retrospective comparative study included 87 patients with obstructive left-sided CC (December 2011–December 2019). Patients were assigned to two groups based on elective laparoscopic surgery for (1) obstructive CC necessitating emergent decompression with SEMS insertion (SEMS group) and (2) obstructive CC without emergent decompression (control group). Results: The SEMS group had a longer operation time (283.3 ± 79.3 min vs 222.2 ± 79.4 min, P = 0.002) and greater blood loss (204.8 ± 417.6 mL vs 53.7 ± 166.1 mL, P = 0.029) on univariate analysis; however, in multiple linear regression analysis, SEMS was not an independent risk factor for both operation time (Δ operation time 25.5 min: P = 0.19) and blood loss (Δ blood loss 33.6 mL: P = 0.58). The complication rate based on Clavien−Dindo grade II did not differ significantly (17% vs 20%, P = 1.00), whereas the rates of conversion to laparotomy (17% vs 2%, P = 0.016) and stoma creation (26% vs 2%, P = 0.001) were higher in the SEMS group. In oncological outcomes, there was no intergroup difference in the 5-year disease-free survival (80.0% vs 72.2%, P = 0.76) and overall survival (100% vs 86.3%, P = 0.25). Conclusions: Laparoscopic surgery after SEMS for left-sided CC is demanding due to higher conversion rates to open surgery. However, this study also revealed that it is as safe as laparoscopic surgery for cases without SEMS because of comparable complication rate and long-term outcomes.","PeriodicalId":49566,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Laparoscopic resection after self-expanding stent insertion for obstructive left-sided colorectal cancer: Clinicopathological features and outcomes\",\"authors\":\"Y. Yokoyama, S. Emoto, H. Nozawa, K. Kawai, K. Sasaki, K. Murono, Rei Ishibashi, K. Koike, S. Ishihara\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14574969221096191\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and objective: Laparoscopic resection for obstructive colon cancer (CC) after insertion of self-expanding metallic stents (SEMSs) is reportedly difficult. However, this has not yet been thoroughly investigated. Therefore, we investigated the influence of SEMS insertion on laparoscopic resection. Methods: This retrospective comparative study included 87 patients with obstructive left-sided CC (December 2011–December 2019). Patients were assigned to two groups based on elective laparoscopic surgery for (1) obstructive CC necessitating emergent decompression with SEMS insertion (SEMS group) and (2) obstructive CC without emergent decompression (control group). Results: The SEMS group had a longer operation time (283.3 ± 79.3 min vs 222.2 ± 79.4 min, P = 0.002) and greater blood loss (204.8 ± 417.6 mL vs 53.7 ± 166.1 mL, P = 0.029) on univariate analysis; however, in multiple linear regression analysis, SEMS was not an independent risk factor for both operation time (Δ operation time 25.5 min: P = 0.19) and blood loss (Δ blood loss 33.6 mL: P = 0.58). The complication rate based on Clavien−Dindo grade II did not differ significantly (17% vs 20%, P = 1.00), whereas the rates of conversion to laparotomy (17% vs 2%, P = 0.016) and stoma creation (26% vs 2%, P = 0.001) were higher in the SEMS group. In oncological outcomes, there was no intergroup difference in the 5-year disease-free survival (80.0% vs 72.2%, P = 0.76) and overall survival (100% vs 86.3%, P = 0.25). Conclusions: Laparoscopic surgery after SEMS for left-sided CC is demanding due to higher conversion rates to open surgery. However, this study also revealed that it is as safe as laparoscopic surgery for cases without SEMS because of comparable complication rate and long-term outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49566,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14574969221096191\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14574969221096191","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
背景与目的:据报道,在插入自膨胀金属支架(SEMSs)后,腹腔镜切除梗阻性结肠癌(CC)是困难的。然而,这一点尚未得到彻底的调查。因此,我们研究了SEMS插入对腹腔镜切除的影响。方法:回顾性比较研究纳入87例左侧梗阻性CC患者(2011年12月- 2019年12月)。患者根据选择性腹腔镜手术分为两组(1)梗阻性CC需要紧急减压并插入SEMS (SEMS组)和(2)梗阻性CC无需紧急减压(对照组)。结果:单因素分析显示,SEMS组手术时间更长(283.3±79.3 min vs 222.2±79.4 min, P = 0.002),出血量更大(204.8±417.6 mL vs 53.7±166.1 mL, P = 0.029);然而,在多元线性回归分析中,SEMS不是手术时间(Δ手术时间25.5 min: P = 0.19)和出血量(Δ出血量33.6 mL: P = 0.58)的独立危险因素。基于Clavien - Dindo II级的并发症发生率无显著差异(17% vs 20%, P = 1.00),而SEMS组中转开腹率(17% vs 2%, P = 0.016)和造口率(26% vs 2%, P = 0.001)更高。在肿瘤预后方面,5年无病生存率(80.0% vs 72.2%, P = 0.76)和总生存率(100% vs 86.3%, P = 0.25)组间无差异。结论:SEMS后腹腔镜手术治疗左侧CC的要求较高,因为转换率较高。然而,这项研究也表明,由于并发症发生率和长期预后相当,对于没有SEMS的病例,它与腹腔镜手术一样安全。
Laparoscopic resection after self-expanding stent insertion for obstructive left-sided colorectal cancer: Clinicopathological features and outcomes
Background and objective: Laparoscopic resection for obstructive colon cancer (CC) after insertion of self-expanding metallic stents (SEMSs) is reportedly difficult. However, this has not yet been thoroughly investigated. Therefore, we investigated the influence of SEMS insertion on laparoscopic resection. Methods: This retrospective comparative study included 87 patients with obstructive left-sided CC (December 2011–December 2019). Patients were assigned to two groups based on elective laparoscopic surgery for (1) obstructive CC necessitating emergent decompression with SEMS insertion (SEMS group) and (2) obstructive CC without emergent decompression (control group). Results: The SEMS group had a longer operation time (283.3 ± 79.3 min vs 222.2 ± 79.4 min, P = 0.002) and greater blood loss (204.8 ± 417.6 mL vs 53.7 ± 166.1 mL, P = 0.029) on univariate analysis; however, in multiple linear regression analysis, SEMS was not an independent risk factor for both operation time (Δ operation time 25.5 min: P = 0.19) and blood loss (Δ blood loss 33.6 mL: P = 0.58). The complication rate based on Clavien−Dindo grade II did not differ significantly (17% vs 20%, P = 1.00), whereas the rates of conversion to laparotomy (17% vs 2%, P = 0.016) and stoma creation (26% vs 2%, P = 0.001) were higher in the SEMS group. In oncological outcomes, there was no intergroup difference in the 5-year disease-free survival (80.0% vs 72.2%, P = 0.76) and overall survival (100% vs 86.3%, P = 0.25). Conclusions: Laparoscopic surgery after SEMS for left-sided CC is demanding due to higher conversion rates to open surgery. However, this study also revealed that it is as safe as laparoscopic surgery for cases without SEMS because of comparable complication rate and long-term outcomes.
期刊介绍:
The Scandinavian Journal of Surgery (SJS) is the official peer reviewed journal of the Finnish Surgical Society and the Scandinavian Surgical Society. It publishes original and review articles from all surgical fields and specialties to reflect the interests of our diverse and international readership that consists of surgeons from all specialties and continents.