跨性别和性别多样化儿童的包容性教育:父母对学校欺凌和风险话语局限性的看法

IF 1.9 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pedagogy Culture and Society Pub Date : 2021-04-19 DOI:10.1080/14681366.2021.1912158
Tania Ferfolja, J. Ullman
{"title":"跨性别和性别多样化儿童的包容性教育:父母对学校欺凌和风险话语局限性的看法","authors":"Tania Ferfolja, J. Ullman","doi":"10.1080/14681366.2021.1912158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper reports on an Australian national investigation of parents of school-aged children attending government schools. The research objective was to ascertain what parents thought in relation to gender and sexuality diversity-related content inclusions in the curriculum, and how a subset of these parents who had a gender and sexuality diverse (GSD) child, experience the public education system for/with their child. Here, we particularly focus on the voices of parents with a transgender or gender-diverse (TGD) child. We examine how these young people are positioned in discourses of risk and safety and how discrimination is depoliticised through bullying discourse. We note how bullying is framed as individualised, leaving broader cisnormative discourses unquestioned. A pedagogy of containment places the burden of gender identity, relationship management and education on the TGD student and family, highlighting a need for more professional development of school personnel.","PeriodicalId":46617,"journal":{"name":"Pedagogy Culture and Society","volume":"29 1","pages":"793 - 810"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14681366.2021.1912158","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inclusive pedagogies for transgender and gender diverse children: parents’ perspectives on the limits of discourses of bullying and risk in schools\",\"authors\":\"Tania Ferfolja, J. Ullman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14681366.2021.1912158\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This paper reports on an Australian national investigation of parents of school-aged children attending government schools. The research objective was to ascertain what parents thought in relation to gender and sexuality diversity-related content inclusions in the curriculum, and how a subset of these parents who had a gender and sexuality diverse (GSD) child, experience the public education system for/with their child. Here, we particularly focus on the voices of parents with a transgender or gender-diverse (TGD) child. We examine how these young people are positioned in discourses of risk and safety and how discrimination is depoliticised through bullying discourse. We note how bullying is framed as individualised, leaving broader cisnormative discourses unquestioned. A pedagogy of containment places the burden of gender identity, relationship management and education on the TGD student and family, highlighting a need for more professional development of school personnel.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46617,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pedagogy Culture and Society\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"793 - 810\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14681366.2021.1912158\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pedagogy Culture and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2021.1912158\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pedagogy Culture and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2021.1912158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

摘要本文报道了澳大利亚对公立学校学龄儿童家长的一项全国性调查。研究目的是确定父母对课程中与性别和性多样性相关的内容的看法,以及这些父母中有一部分孩子的性别和性取向多样性(GSD),如何体验他们孩子的公共教育系统。在这里,我们特别关注有跨性别或性别多样化(TGD)孩子的父母的声音。我们研究了这些年轻人在风险和安全话语中的定位,以及歧视是如何通过欺凌话语去政治化的。我们注意到欺凌是如何被定义为个性化的,让更广泛的顺规范话语毫无疑问。遏制教育法将性别认同、关系管理和教育的负担交给了TGD学生和家庭,强调了学校人员更专业发展的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Inclusive pedagogies for transgender and gender diverse children: parents’ perspectives on the limits of discourses of bullying and risk in schools
ABSTRACT This paper reports on an Australian national investigation of parents of school-aged children attending government schools. The research objective was to ascertain what parents thought in relation to gender and sexuality diversity-related content inclusions in the curriculum, and how a subset of these parents who had a gender and sexuality diverse (GSD) child, experience the public education system for/with their child. Here, we particularly focus on the voices of parents with a transgender or gender-diverse (TGD) child. We examine how these young people are positioned in discourses of risk and safety and how discrimination is depoliticised through bullying discourse. We note how bullying is framed as individualised, leaving broader cisnormative discourses unquestioned. A pedagogy of containment places the burden of gender identity, relationship management and education on the TGD student and family, highlighting a need for more professional development of school personnel.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pedagogy Culture and Society
Pedagogy Culture and Society EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Pedagogy, Culture & Society is a fully-refereed international journal that seeks to provide an international forum for pedagogy discussion and debate. The identity of the journal is built on the belief that pedagogy debate has the following features: •Pedagogy debate is not restricted by geographical boundaries: its participants are the international educational community and its proceedings appeal to a worldwide audience. •Pedagogy debate is open and democratic: it is not the preserve of teachers, politicians, academics or administrators but requires open discussion.
期刊最新文献
Strengthening Indigenous parents’ co-leadership through culturally responsive home-school partnerships: a practical implementation framework “The farmer, the guide, and the bridge”: the voice of community partners within European Service-Learning Personal, pedagogic play: a dialogic model for video game learning Nurturing inclusivity and professional growth among vocational teachers through communities of practice The manifestations of universality and cultural specificity in national curriculum policy frameworks: negotiations for culturally reflective practice in early childhood education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1