生活方式干预对癌症大肠癌患者可行的评论,具有潜在的短期健康益处

S. Moug, A. Bryce, N. Mutrie, Annie S. Anderson
{"title":"生活方式干预对癌症大肠癌患者可行的评论,具有潜在的短期健康益处","authors":"S. Moug, A. Bryce, N. Mutrie, Annie S. Anderson","doi":"10.4172/2471-9846.1000181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose Lifestyle interventions have been proposed to improve cancer survivorship in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), but with treatment pathways becoming increasingly multi-modal and prolonged, opportunities for interventions may be limited. This systematic review assessed the evidence for the feasibility of performing lifestyle interventions in CRC patients and evaluated any short- and long-term health benefits. Methods Using PRISMA Guidelines, selected keywords identified randomised controlled studies (RCTs) of lifestyle interventions [smoking, alcohol, physical activity (PA) and diet/excess body weight] in CRC patients. These electronic databases were searched in June 2015: Dynamed, Cochrane Database, OVID MEDLINE, OVID EMBASE, and PEDro. Results Fourteen RCTs were identified: PA RCTs ( n = 10) consisted mainly of telephone-prompted walking or cycling interventions of varied durations, predominately in adjuvant setting; dietary/excess weight interventions RCTs ( n = 4) focused on low-fat and/or high-fibre diets within a multimodal lifestyle intervention. There were no reported RCTs in smoking or alcohol cessation/reduction. PA and/or die-tary/excess weight interventions reported variable recruitment rates, but good adherence and retention/follow-up rates, leading to short-term improvements in dietary quality, physical, psychological and quality-of-life parameters. Only one study assessed long-term follow-up, finding significantly improved cancer-specific survival after dietary intervention. Conclusions This is the first systematic review on lifestyle interventions in patients with CRC finding these interventions to be feasible with improvements in short-term health. Future work should focus on defining the optimal type of intervention (type, duration, timing and intensity) that not only leads to improved short-term outcomes but also assesses long-term survival. randomised factors, overall","PeriodicalId":92236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of community & public health nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2471-9846.1000181","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Commentary on Lifestyle Interventions Are Feasible in Patients with Colorectal Cancer with Potential Short-Term Health Benefits\",\"authors\":\"S. Moug, A. Bryce, N. Mutrie, Annie S. Anderson\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2471-9846.1000181\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose Lifestyle interventions have been proposed to improve cancer survivorship in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), but with treatment pathways becoming increasingly multi-modal and prolonged, opportunities for interventions may be limited. This systematic review assessed the evidence for the feasibility of performing lifestyle interventions in CRC patients and evaluated any short- and long-term health benefits. Methods Using PRISMA Guidelines, selected keywords identified randomised controlled studies (RCTs) of lifestyle interventions [smoking, alcohol, physical activity (PA) and diet/excess body weight] in CRC patients. These electronic databases were searched in June 2015: Dynamed, Cochrane Database, OVID MEDLINE, OVID EMBASE, and PEDro. Results Fourteen RCTs were identified: PA RCTs ( n = 10) consisted mainly of telephone-prompted walking or cycling interventions of varied durations, predominately in adjuvant setting; dietary/excess weight interventions RCTs ( n = 4) focused on low-fat and/or high-fibre diets within a multimodal lifestyle intervention. There were no reported RCTs in smoking or alcohol cessation/reduction. PA and/or die-tary/excess weight interventions reported variable recruitment rates, but good adherence and retention/follow-up rates, leading to short-term improvements in dietary quality, physical, psychological and quality-of-life parameters. Only one study assessed long-term follow-up, finding significantly improved cancer-specific survival after dietary intervention. Conclusions This is the first systematic review on lifestyle interventions in patients with CRC finding these interventions to be feasible with improvements in short-term health. Future work should focus on defining the optimal type of intervention (type, duration, timing and intensity) that not only leads to improved short-term outcomes but also assesses long-term survival. randomised factors, overall\",\"PeriodicalId\":92236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of community & public health nursing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2471-9846.1000181\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of community & public health nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2471-9846.1000181\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of community & public health nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2471-9846.1000181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的已提出生活方式干预措施来提高癌症(CRC)患者的癌症生存率,但随着治疗途径日益多样化和延长,干预的机会可能有限。这项系统综述评估了对CRC患者进行生活方式干预的可行性证据,并评估了任何短期和长期健康益处。方法使用PRISMA指南,选定的关键词确定了CRC患者生活方式干预[吸烟、饮酒、体育活动(PA)和饮食/超重]的随机对照研究(RCT)。这些电子数据库于2015年6月检索:Dynamed、Cochrane数据库、OVID MEDLINE、OVID EMBASE和PEDro。结果确定了14项随机对照试验:PA随机对照试验(n=10)主要包括不同持续时间的电话提示步行或骑自行车干预,主要在辅助环境中;饮食/超重干预随机对照试验(n=4)侧重于多模式生活方式干预中的低脂和/或高纤维饮食。没有关于戒烟或减少饮酒的随机对照试验报告。PA和/或死亡/超重干预报告称,招募率可变,但依从性和保留/随访率良好,导致饮食质量、身体、心理和生活质量参数的短期改善。只有一项研究评估了长期随访,发现饮食干预后癌症特异性生存率显著提高。结论这是首次对CRC患者的生活方式干预进行系统综述,发现这些干预措施在改善短期健康方面是可行的。未来的工作应侧重于确定最佳干预类型(类型、持续时间、时间和强度),不仅能改善短期结果,还能评估长期生存率。随机因素,总体
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Commentary on Lifestyle Interventions Are Feasible in Patients with Colorectal Cancer with Potential Short-Term Health Benefits
Purpose Lifestyle interventions have been proposed to improve cancer survivorship in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), but with treatment pathways becoming increasingly multi-modal and prolonged, opportunities for interventions may be limited. This systematic review assessed the evidence for the feasibility of performing lifestyle interventions in CRC patients and evaluated any short- and long-term health benefits. Methods Using PRISMA Guidelines, selected keywords identified randomised controlled studies (RCTs) of lifestyle interventions [smoking, alcohol, physical activity (PA) and diet/excess body weight] in CRC patients. These electronic databases were searched in June 2015: Dynamed, Cochrane Database, OVID MEDLINE, OVID EMBASE, and PEDro. Results Fourteen RCTs were identified: PA RCTs ( n = 10) consisted mainly of telephone-prompted walking or cycling interventions of varied durations, predominately in adjuvant setting; dietary/excess weight interventions RCTs ( n = 4) focused on low-fat and/or high-fibre diets within a multimodal lifestyle intervention. There were no reported RCTs in smoking or alcohol cessation/reduction. PA and/or die-tary/excess weight interventions reported variable recruitment rates, but good adherence and retention/follow-up rates, leading to short-term improvements in dietary quality, physical, psychological and quality-of-life parameters. Only one study assessed long-term follow-up, finding significantly improved cancer-specific survival after dietary intervention. Conclusions This is the first systematic review on lifestyle interventions in patients with CRC finding these interventions to be feasible with improvements in short-term health. Future work should focus on defining the optimal type of intervention (type, duration, timing and intensity) that not only leads to improved short-term outcomes but also assesses long-term survival. randomised factors, overall
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Complexity and Emergent Care Development of the model mobilizing nutrition health promotion and education in community The relationship between bullying and depression scales in the adolescent The associations among health literacy, diabetes self-management and glycemic control in older people with poorly controlled type-2 diabetes mellitus Taiwanese indigenous cancer survivors intent to advance care planning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1