可持续性幼儿教育中的人与自然关系:形而上学分析与重塑

IF 1.6 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Australasian Journal of Early Childhood Pub Date : 2021-12-23 DOI:10.1177/18369391211061187
Neal Dreamson, Soyoung Kim
{"title":"可持续性幼儿教育中的人与自然关系:形而上学分析与重塑","authors":"Neal Dreamson, Soyoung Kim","doi":"10.1177/18369391211061187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Popular instructional approaches in Early Childhood Education for Sustainability (ECEfS) are co-construction learning, transformative learning and ecological learning. These rely on constructivism that could challenge human–nature relationships of ECEfS. In this study, we aim to discover and reshape human–nature relationships embedded in the approaches. To do so, we deconstruct the approaches through a metaphysical analysis with ontology, epistemology and axiology. As a result, we confirm that they are likely to view humans and nature as two separate entities. For sustainability, we distinguish an ontological view (‘N’ature) and an epistemological view (‘n’ature) and justify the distinction based on posthumanists’ concepts of non-humans and more-than-humans. We present a metaphysically reshaped human–nature relationship and argue that this new model enables teachers to critically review ‘human-made/observed natures’ and participate in the reconciliation between ‘N’ature and humanity. We also apply the model into a waste-recycle activity to clarify its potential practicality.","PeriodicalId":46779,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Early Childhood","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Human–nature relationships in early childhood education for sustainability: Metaphysical analysis and reshaping\",\"authors\":\"Neal Dreamson, Soyoung Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/18369391211061187\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Popular instructional approaches in Early Childhood Education for Sustainability (ECEfS) are co-construction learning, transformative learning and ecological learning. These rely on constructivism that could challenge human–nature relationships of ECEfS. In this study, we aim to discover and reshape human–nature relationships embedded in the approaches. To do so, we deconstruct the approaches through a metaphysical analysis with ontology, epistemology and axiology. As a result, we confirm that they are likely to view humans and nature as two separate entities. For sustainability, we distinguish an ontological view (‘N’ature) and an epistemological view (‘n’ature) and justify the distinction based on posthumanists’ concepts of non-humans and more-than-humans. We present a metaphysically reshaped human–nature relationship and argue that this new model enables teachers to critically review ‘human-made/observed natures’ and participate in the reconciliation between ‘N’ature and humanity. We also apply the model into a waste-recycle activity to clarify its potential practicality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46779,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australasian Journal of Early Childhood\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australasian Journal of Early Childhood\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/18369391211061187\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Early Childhood","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/18369391211061187","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在幼儿可持续发展教育中,常见的教学方法有共建式学习、变革式学习和生态式学习。这些依赖于可能挑战ECEfS的人与自然关系的建构主义。在这项研究中,我们的目标是发现和重塑嵌入在这些方法中的人与自然的关系。为此,我们通过本体论、认识论和价值论的形而上学分析来解构这些方法。因此,我们确认他们很可能将人类和自然视为两个独立的实体。对于可持续性,我们区分了本体论观点(“N”nature)和认识论观点(“N”nature),并基于后人文主义者的非人类和超越人类的概念来证明这种区别。我们提出了一种形而上重塑的人与自然关系,并认为这种新模式使教师能够批判性地审查“人为/观察的自然”,并参与“自然”与“人类”之间的和解。我们还将该模型应用到一个废物回收活动中,以阐明其潜在的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Human–nature relationships in early childhood education for sustainability: Metaphysical analysis and reshaping
Popular instructional approaches in Early Childhood Education for Sustainability (ECEfS) are co-construction learning, transformative learning and ecological learning. These rely on constructivism that could challenge human–nature relationships of ECEfS. In this study, we aim to discover and reshape human–nature relationships embedded in the approaches. To do so, we deconstruct the approaches through a metaphysical analysis with ontology, epistemology and axiology. As a result, we confirm that they are likely to view humans and nature as two separate entities. For sustainability, we distinguish an ontological view (‘N’ature) and an epistemological view (‘n’ature) and justify the distinction based on posthumanists’ concepts of non-humans and more-than-humans. We present a metaphysically reshaped human–nature relationship and argue that this new model enables teachers to critically review ‘human-made/observed natures’ and participate in the reconciliation between ‘N’ature and humanity. We also apply the model into a waste-recycle activity to clarify its potential practicality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australasian Journal of Early Childhood
Australasian Journal of Early Childhood EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: The Australasian Journal of Early Childhood (AJEC) is Australasia’s foremost scholarly journal and the world’s longest-running major journal within the early childhood education and care sector. Published quarterly, AJEC offers evidence-based articles that are designed to impart new information and encourage the critical exchange of ideas among early childhood practitioners, academics and students. AJEC is peer reviewed by leading early childhood education and care academics, against quality-assurance guidelines to ensure that all articles promote best practice and disseminate high-quality information in the early childhood education and care sector.
期刊最新文献
Developmental evaluation of the HIPPY Age 3 program for socially disadvantaged families in Australia Smoke: Enablers and barriers for sustainable engagement with local Aboriginal communities Listening, empowering and innovating - Reflections from the AJEC Symposium 2024 Understanding the need and opportunity for a trauma-informed early childhood organisations (TIO) program using intervention mapping Corrigendum to “Complexifying quality in early childhood contexts through a theory of quality ecologies”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1