以色列巴勒斯坦公民在马姆拉赫提文化中的地位:第一个独立日与迁就观念

IF 0.7 Q2 AREA STUDIES Israel Studies Pub Date : 2022-07-26 DOI:10.2979/israelstudies.27.3.04
Adi Sherzer
{"title":"以色列巴勒斯坦公民在马姆拉赫提文化中的地位:第一个独立日与迁就观念","authors":"Adi Sherzer","doi":"10.2979/israelstudies.27.3.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:The place of Israel’s Palestinian citizens in its republican-mamlakhti culture is a constant source of ambivalence and indecisiveness for Israeli agents of memory. The issue was initially raised with regard to the first Independence Day, when the different institutions were unsure how Palestinian citizens should mark it, if at all. During the 1950s, this question concerned 150,000–200,000 Palestinian citizens (11%–18% of the total population), but it also had implications for the national narrative and the public sphere. The article argues that despite the obvious power relations between Jews and Palestinians, during the first five Independence Days the authorities often used terminology and techniques of accommodation commonly associated with consociationalism. In the belief that the holiday celebrations should not be enforced (at least not directly), they avoided addressing the source of tension (the place of non-Jews in a Jewish public culture), and generally accepted decisions that were locally based, temporary and improvised.","PeriodicalId":54159,"journal":{"name":"Israel Studies","volume":"27 1","pages":"69 - 93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Place of Israel’s Palestinian Citizens in Mamlakhti Culture: The First Independence Days and the Notion of Accommodation\",\"authors\":\"Adi Sherzer\",\"doi\":\"10.2979/israelstudies.27.3.04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT:The place of Israel’s Palestinian citizens in its republican-mamlakhti culture is a constant source of ambivalence and indecisiveness for Israeli agents of memory. The issue was initially raised with regard to the first Independence Day, when the different institutions were unsure how Palestinian citizens should mark it, if at all. During the 1950s, this question concerned 150,000–200,000 Palestinian citizens (11%–18% of the total population), but it also had implications for the national narrative and the public sphere. The article argues that despite the obvious power relations between Jews and Palestinians, during the first five Independence Days the authorities often used terminology and techniques of accommodation commonly associated with consociationalism. In the belief that the holiday celebrations should not be enforced (at least not directly), they avoided addressing the source of tension (the place of non-Jews in a Jewish public culture), and generally accepted decisions that were locally based, temporary and improvised.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Israel Studies\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"69 - 93\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Israel Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2979/israelstudies.27.3.04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Israel Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/israelstudies.27.3.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:对于以色列的记忆代理人来说,以色列的巴勒斯坦公民在其共和主义的mamlakhti文化中的地位一直是矛盾和优柔寡断的根源。这个问题最初是在第一个独立日提出的,当时不同的机构不确定巴勒斯坦公民应该如何纪念它。在20世纪50年代,这个问题涉及15万至20万巴勒斯坦公民(占总人口的11%至18%),但它也对国家叙事和公共领域产生了影响。文章认为,尽管犹太人和巴勒斯坦人之间存在明显的权力关系,但在前五个独立日期间,当局经常使用通常与联合主义有关的术语和通融技巧。他们认为节日庆祝活动不应强制执行(至少不应直接执行),因此避免解决紧张局势的根源(非犹太人在犹太公共文化中的地位),并普遍接受基于当地的、临时的和即兴的决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Place of Israel’s Palestinian Citizens in Mamlakhti Culture: The First Independence Days and the Notion of Accommodation
ABSTRACT:The place of Israel’s Palestinian citizens in its republican-mamlakhti culture is a constant source of ambivalence and indecisiveness for Israeli agents of memory. The issue was initially raised with regard to the first Independence Day, when the different institutions were unsure how Palestinian citizens should mark it, if at all. During the 1950s, this question concerned 150,000–200,000 Palestinian citizens (11%–18% of the total population), but it also had implications for the national narrative and the public sphere. The article argues that despite the obvious power relations between Jews and Palestinians, during the first five Independence Days the authorities often used terminology and techniques of accommodation commonly associated with consociationalism. In the belief that the holiday celebrations should not be enforced (at least not directly), they avoided addressing the source of tension (the place of non-Jews in a Jewish public culture), and generally accepted decisions that were locally based, temporary and improvised.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Israel Studies
Israel Studies AREA STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Israel Studies presents multidisciplinary scholarship on Israeli history, politics, society, and culture. Each issue includes essays and reports on matters of broad interest reflecting diverse points of view. Temporal boundaries extend to the pre-state period, although emphasis is on the State of Israel. Due recognition is also given to events and phenomena in diaspora communities as they affect the Israeli state. It is sponsored by the Ben-Gurion Research Institute for the Study of Israel and Zionism at Ben-Gurion University of the Negev and the Schusterman Center for Israel Studies at Brandeis University, in affiliation with the Association for Israel Studies.
期刊最新文献
Italian Catholics and the June 1967 War: A Turning Point From Rule of Law to the Law of the Ruler: The Twofold Upheaval of the Israeli Right Mizrahi Jews as Viewed in the Yishuv: The Case of Hannah Helena Thon "That Jewish Belief in the Living God of Israel": Jewish Tradition in the Thought of Ze'ev Jabotinsky Ultra-Orthodox Women's Reaction to the "Society of Learners" Model as a Motive among Israel's Ultra-Orthodox Feminists
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1