白内障手术后眼内炎的发病率:时间回顾和洲际比较

Qingyun Wen, Rachel Xuan, K. Ong
{"title":"白内障手术后眼内炎的发病率:时间回顾和洲际比较","authors":"Qingyun Wen, Rachel Xuan, K. Ong","doi":"10.35119/ASJOO.V18I1.941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This review aimed to investigate the global incidence of postoperative endophthalmitis (POE) after cataract surgery over the last three decades, with a particular focus on the use of prophylactic intracameral antibiotics. \nStudy design: Literature review. \nMethods: A literature search was performed in PubMed and Scopus. Data was collected from included studies and analyzed in IBM SPSS v27. \nResults: A total of 63 studies from 20 regions were included. The use of prophylactic intracameral antibiotics significantly reduced POE incidence. The baseline POE incidence in studies that involved intracameral prophylaxis tended to be high. A downward linear trend in POE incidence was observed in studies that did not involve intracameral antibiotic prophylaxis. Interestingly, a study in Japan reported the use of intracameral antibiotic prophylaxis in only 10.4% of cataract surgeries with an overall POE incidence of 0.025%, which is comparable to countries that use intracameral prophylaxis routinely. Within studies from Australia, China, Europe, India, Singapore and United States, Australia had the highest POE incidence with and without intracameral prophylaxis, while China had the lowest POE incidences. \nConclusion: Intracameral antibiotics are an effective prophylaxis against POE. However, the incidence of POE is decreasing worldwide even without intracameral prophylaxis. The benefits of intracameral antibiotics should be weighed against its risks prior to its implementation as routine prophylaxis protocol for cataract surgery.","PeriodicalId":39864,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"18 1","pages":"19-39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incidence of post-cataract surgery endophthalmitis: a chronological review and intercontinental comparison\",\"authors\":\"Qingyun Wen, Rachel Xuan, K. Ong\",\"doi\":\"10.35119/ASJOO.V18I1.941\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: This review aimed to investigate the global incidence of postoperative endophthalmitis (POE) after cataract surgery over the last three decades, with a particular focus on the use of prophylactic intracameral antibiotics. \\nStudy design: Literature review. \\nMethods: A literature search was performed in PubMed and Scopus. Data was collected from included studies and analyzed in IBM SPSS v27. \\nResults: A total of 63 studies from 20 regions were included. The use of prophylactic intracameral antibiotics significantly reduced POE incidence. The baseline POE incidence in studies that involved intracameral prophylaxis tended to be high. A downward linear trend in POE incidence was observed in studies that did not involve intracameral antibiotic prophylaxis. Interestingly, a study in Japan reported the use of intracameral antibiotic prophylaxis in only 10.4% of cataract surgeries with an overall POE incidence of 0.025%, which is comparable to countries that use intracameral prophylaxis routinely. Within studies from Australia, China, Europe, India, Singapore and United States, Australia had the highest POE incidence with and without intracameral prophylaxis, while China had the lowest POE incidences. \\nConclusion: Intracameral antibiotics are an effective prophylaxis against POE. However, the incidence of POE is decreasing worldwide even without intracameral prophylaxis. The benefits of intracameral antibiotics should be weighed against its risks prior to its implementation as routine prophylaxis protocol for cataract surgery.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39864,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"19-39\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35119/ASJOO.V18I1.941\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35119/ASJOO.V18I1.941","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本综述旨在调查过去三十年白内障手术后术后眼内炎(POE)的全球发病率,特别关注预防性房内抗生素的使用。研究设计:文献综述。方法:在PubMed和Scopus进行文献检索。从纳入的研究中收集数据,并在IBM SPSS v27中进行分析。结果:共纳入了来自20个地区的63项研究。预防性房内抗生素的使用显著降低了POE的发生率。在涉及房内预防的研究中,POE的基线发病率往往很高。在不涉及房内抗生素预防的研究中,观察到POE发病率呈线性下降趋势。有趣的是,日本的一项研究报告称,只有10.4%的白内障手术使用了房内抗生素预防,POE的总发病率为0.025%,这与常规使用房内预防的国家相当。在来自澳大利亚、中国、欧洲、印度、新加坡和美国的研究中,澳大利亚在进行和不进行房内预防的情况下POE发病率最高,而中国的POE发生率最低。结论:腔内抗生素是预防POE的有效方法。然而,即使没有房内预防,POE的发病率在全球范围内也在下降。在作为白内障手术的常规预防方案实施之前,应权衡房内抗生素的益处及其风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Incidence of post-cataract surgery endophthalmitis: a chronological review and intercontinental comparison
Purpose: This review aimed to investigate the global incidence of postoperative endophthalmitis (POE) after cataract surgery over the last three decades, with a particular focus on the use of prophylactic intracameral antibiotics. Study design: Literature review. Methods: A literature search was performed in PubMed and Scopus. Data was collected from included studies and analyzed in IBM SPSS v27. Results: A total of 63 studies from 20 regions were included. The use of prophylactic intracameral antibiotics significantly reduced POE incidence. The baseline POE incidence in studies that involved intracameral prophylaxis tended to be high. A downward linear trend in POE incidence was observed in studies that did not involve intracameral antibiotic prophylaxis. Interestingly, a study in Japan reported the use of intracameral antibiotic prophylaxis in only 10.4% of cataract surgeries with an overall POE incidence of 0.025%, which is comparable to countries that use intracameral prophylaxis routinely. Within studies from Australia, China, Europe, India, Singapore and United States, Australia had the highest POE incidence with and without intracameral prophylaxis, while China had the lowest POE incidences. Conclusion: Intracameral antibiotics are an effective prophylaxis against POE. However, the incidence of POE is decreasing worldwide even without intracameral prophylaxis. The benefits of intracameral antibiotics should be weighed against its risks prior to its implementation as routine prophylaxis protocol for cataract surgery.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asian Journal of Ophthalmology
Asian Journal of Ophthalmology Medicine-Ophthalmology
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Asian Journal of OPHTHALMOLOGY is the official peer-reviewed journal of the South East Asia Glaucoma Interest Group (SEAGIG) and is indexed in EMBASE/Excerpta Medica. Asian Journal of OPHTHALMOLOGY is published quarterly (four [4] issues per year) by Scientific Communications International Limited. The journal is published on-line only and is distributed free of cost via the SEAGIG website.
期刊最新文献
Is zero incidence of postoperative endophthalmitis after cataract surgery achievable Is indiscriminate use of intracameral prophylactic antibiotics in cataract surgery appropriate Ultrasound monitoring for minocyclineinduced idiopathic intracranial hypertension Subconjunctival antibiotics: an alternative to intracameral antibiotics for endophthalmitis prophylaxis in cataract surgery Changes in practice guidelines and regulations in ophthalmology due to COVID-19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1