评估烦躁玩具在教室中的证据

IF 0.7 4区 教育学 Q4 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Intervention in School and Clinic Pub Date : 2022-10-18 DOI:10.1177/10534512221130070
Stephanie Kriescher, David M. Hulac, Alexandra M. Ryan, Breanna L. King
{"title":"评估烦躁玩具在教室中的证据","authors":"Stephanie Kriescher, David M. Hulac, Alexandra M. Ryan, Breanna L. King","doi":"10.1177/10534512221130070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fidget toys have been marketed as universal educational supports in the absence of a scientific evidence base. This article gives an overview of the existing literature on the effect of fidget toy use on student attention, behavior, and learning, and a review of two competing theoretical approaches to fidget toys: sensory processing theory and cognitive load theory. Currently, there is not sufficient support for the implementation of fidget toys in the classroom. Suggestions for best practice when using fidget toys in an educational setting are included.","PeriodicalId":14475,"journal":{"name":"Intervention in School and Clinic","volume":"59 1","pages":"66 - 69"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the Evidence for Fidget Toys in the Classroom\",\"authors\":\"Stephanie Kriescher, David M. Hulac, Alexandra M. Ryan, Breanna L. King\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10534512221130070\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Fidget toys have been marketed as universal educational supports in the absence of a scientific evidence base. This article gives an overview of the existing literature on the effect of fidget toy use on student attention, behavior, and learning, and a review of two competing theoretical approaches to fidget toys: sensory processing theory and cognitive load theory. Currently, there is not sufficient support for the implementation of fidget toys in the classroom. Suggestions for best practice when using fidget toys in an educational setting are included.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14475,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intervention in School and Clinic\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"66 - 69\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intervention in School and Clinic\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10534512221130070\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intervention in School and Clinic","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10534512221130070","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在缺乏科学依据的情况下,坐立不安的玩具被宣传为普及教育的辅助工具。本文概述了现有的关于使用烦躁玩具对学生注意力、行为和学习的影响的文献,并回顾了烦躁玩具的两种相互竞争的理论方法:感觉加工理论和认知负荷理论。目前,没有足够的支持在课堂上实施坐立不安的玩具。其中包括在教育环境中使用坐立不安玩具的最佳实践建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluating the Evidence for Fidget Toys in the Classroom
Fidget toys have been marketed as universal educational supports in the absence of a scientific evidence base. This article gives an overview of the existing literature on the effect of fidget toy use on student attention, behavior, and learning, and a review of two competing theoretical approaches to fidget toys: sensory processing theory and cognitive load theory. Currently, there is not sufficient support for the implementation of fidget toys in the classroom. Suggestions for best practice when using fidget toys in an educational setting are included.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Intervention in School and Clinic
Intervention in School and Clinic EDUCATION, SPECIAL-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Intervention in School and Clinic is practitioner-oriented and designed to provide practical, research-based ideas to educators who work with students with severe learning disabilities and emotional/behavioral problems. Emphasis is placed on strategies and techniques that can be easily implemented in school or clinic settings and address the multifaceted needs of students with severe LD and emotional/behavioral problems. Specifically, articles should target curricular, instructional, social, behavioral, assessment, and vocational strategies and techniques and have direct application to the classroom setting.
期刊最新文献
Collaboration Is the Key: A Conversation With Dr. Vivian I. Correa The Technological Past Informs the Present: A Conversation with Dr. Cynthia M. Okolo Data-Informed Professional Learning and Instruction in Integrated Tiered Systems Utilizing Text-Generative AI for Creating Oral Reading Fluency Probes Utilizing Emergent AI Chatbot Technology to Generate Mathematical Writing Models for Elementary Students With Learning Disabilities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1