研究生的互联网使用和网络成瘾的流行:新冠肺炎后图书馆员可以扮演什么角色?

IF 1.1 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Digital Library Perspectives Pub Date : 2023-08-22 DOI:10.1108/dlp-12-2022-0100
O. Salubi, N. Muchaonyerwa
{"title":"研究生的互联网使用和网络成瘾的流行:新冠肺炎后图书馆员可以扮演什么角色?","authors":"O. Salubi, N. Muchaonyerwa","doi":"10.1108/dlp-12-2022-0100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study empirically analyse the lived and individual experiences of internet use time among postgraduate students in a period where the line between the virtual and real is blurred. The infusion of the internet in higher education has not only facilitated the production of new knowledge but has also led to reports of internet addiction among many users during the COVID-19 pandemic and the resulting lockdowns. This study aims to evaluate the level of internet addiction among postgraduate students and the supportive information services role that librarians could provide.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nIn this study, 279 postgraduate students completed a quantitative survey targeted at all the postgraduate students at a university campus in South Africa. Data was collected using an adopted internet addiction test questionnaire. The data was descriptively and inferentially analysed.\n\n\nFindings\nAs many as 61 (22.7%) are always online, with most of the respondents, 112 (41.6%) spend 10 h or more on the internet daily. Laptop computers at 44.7% emerged as the primary electronic device used by postgraduate students for accessing the internet, surpassing the prevalence of mobile phone usage. On internet addiction level, internet use time had a statistically significant relation with problematic internet use levels in respondents. These results suggest that the increased uncontrolled internet use could negatively interfere with productive academic work of postgraduate students. However, based on the inferential statistical results, it can be concluded that academic use of the internet does not contribute to increased levels of internet addiction. The study recommends that librarians should provide literacy education and resources on how to use the internet safely and responsibly, including tips on setting boundaries, managing time online and productively using online information resources.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe study assesses problematic internet use among postgraduate students and provides suggestions on supportive information services that librarians could provide in an era where many library information services provision and higher education are hinged on the internet.\n","PeriodicalId":42447,"journal":{"name":"Digital Library Perspectives","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Postgraduate students’ internet use and prevalence of internet addiction: what roles can librarians play post COVID-19?\",\"authors\":\"O. Salubi, N. Muchaonyerwa\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/dlp-12-2022-0100\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThis study empirically analyse the lived and individual experiences of internet use time among postgraduate students in a period where the line between the virtual and real is blurred. The infusion of the internet in higher education has not only facilitated the production of new knowledge but has also led to reports of internet addiction among many users during the COVID-19 pandemic and the resulting lockdowns. This study aims to evaluate the level of internet addiction among postgraduate students and the supportive information services role that librarians could provide.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nIn this study, 279 postgraduate students completed a quantitative survey targeted at all the postgraduate students at a university campus in South Africa. Data was collected using an adopted internet addiction test questionnaire. The data was descriptively and inferentially analysed.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nAs many as 61 (22.7%) are always online, with most of the respondents, 112 (41.6%) spend 10 h or more on the internet daily. Laptop computers at 44.7% emerged as the primary electronic device used by postgraduate students for accessing the internet, surpassing the prevalence of mobile phone usage. On internet addiction level, internet use time had a statistically significant relation with problematic internet use levels in respondents. These results suggest that the increased uncontrolled internet use could negatively interfere with productive academic work of postgraduate students. However, based on the inferential statistical results, it can be concluded that academic use of the internet does not contribute to increased levels of internet addiction. The study recommends that librarians should provide literacy education and resources on how to use the internet safely and responsibly, including tips on setting boundaries, managing time online and productively using online information resources.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThe study assesses problematic internet use among postgraduate students and provides suggestions on supportive information services that librarians could provide in an era where many library information services provision and higher education are hinged on the internet.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":42447,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digital Library Perspectives\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digital Library Perspectives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/dlp-12-2022-0100\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Library Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/dlp-12-2022-0100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究实证分析了在虚拟与现实界限模糊的时期,研究生对互联网使用时间的生活和个人体验。互联网在高等教育中的应用不仅促进了新知识的产生,而且在2019冠状病毒病大流行和随之而来的封锁期间,许多用户出现了网瘾的报告。本研究旨在评估研究生网络成瘾程度,以及图书馆馆员所能提供的支持性资讯服务角色。设计/方法/方法在这项研究中,279名研究生完成了一项针对南非一所大学校园所有研究生的定量调查。数据收集采用网络成瘾测试问卷。对数据进行了描述性和推理性分析。多达61人(22.7%)总是在线,大多数受访者,112人(41.6%)每天在网上花费10小时或以上。笔记本电脑以44.7%的比例成为研究生上网的主要电子设备,超过了手机的使用率。在网络成瘾水平上,网络使用时间与被调查者的问题网络使用水平有显著的统计学意义。这些结果表明,不受控制的互联网使用的增加可能会对研究生的生产性学术工作产生负面干扰。然而,根据推论统计结果,可以得出结论,学术使用互联网并不会增加网络成瘾水平。该研究建议,图书馆员应提供有关如何安全、负责地使用互联网的扫盲教育和资源,包括设置界限、管理上网时间和有效利用在线信息资源的提示。原创性/价值本研究评估了研究生在互联网使用中存在的问题,并提出了在许多图书馆信息服务提供和高等教育依赖互联网的时代,图书馆员可以提供的支持性信息服务建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Postgraduate students’ internet use and prevalence of internet addiction: what roles can librarians play post COVID-19?
Purpose This study empirically analyse the lived and individual experiences of internet use time among postgraduate students in a period where the line between the virtual and real is blurred. The infusion of the internet in higher education has not only facilitated the production of new knowledge but has also led to reports of internet addiction among many users during the COVID-19 pandemic and the resulting lockdowns. This study aims to evaluate the level of internet addiction among postgraduate students and the supportive information services role that librarians could provide. Design/methodology/approach In this study, 279 postgraduate students completed a quantitative survey targeted at all the postgraduate students at a university campus in South Africa. Data was collected using an adopted internet addiction test questionnaire. The data was descriptively and inferentially analysed. Findings As many as 61 (22.7%) are always online, with most of the respondents, 112 (41.6%) spend 10 h or more on the internet daily. Laptop computers at 44.7% emerged as the primary electronic device used by postgraduate students for accessing the internet, surpassing the prevalence of mobile phone usage. On internet addiction level, internet use time had a statistically significant relation with problematic internet use levels in respondents. These results suggest that the increased uncontrolled internet use could negatively interfere with productive academic work of postgraduate students. However, based on the inferential statistical results, it can be concluded that academic use of the internet does not contribute to increased levels of internet addiction. The study recommends that librarians should provide literacy education and resources on how to use the internet safely and responsibly, including tips on setting boundaries, managing time online and productively using online information resources. Originality/value The study assesses problematic internet use among postgraduate students and provides suggestions on supportive information services that librarians could provide in an era where many library information services provision and higher education are hinged on the internet.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Digital Library Perspectives
Digital Library Perspectives INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
11.80%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Digital Library Perspectives (DLP) is a peer-reviewed journal concerned with digital content collections. It publishes research related to the curation and web-based delivery of digital objects collected for the advancement of scholarship, teaching and learning. And which advance the digital information environment as it relates to global knowledge, communication and world memory. The journal aims to keep readers informed about current trends, initiatives, and developments. Including those in digital libraries and digital repositories, along with their standards and technologies. The editor invites contributions on the following, as well as other related topics: Digitization, Data as information, Archives and manuscripts, Digital preservation and digital archiving, Digital cultural memory initiatives, Usability studies, K-12 and higher education uses of digital collections.
期刊最新文献
Multimethod digitalisation of a large-format school map from the first half of the 20th century Preservation of theses and dissertations in the era of digitization: a case study of selected universities in Oyo state, Nigeria Dynamics of plagiarism among the social sciences students at Kuwait University Undergraduates’ experiences with library portal services: perceptions of usefulness and satisfaction Digital information needs and information-seeking behaviour among legal practitioners at the Lahore High Court, Punjab, Pakistan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1