统一的众神,统一的雅典:奥对民主的挑战

IF 0.2 3区 历史学 0 CLASSICS ARETHUSA Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1353/are.2023.a899548
A. Shilo
{"title":"统一的众神,统一的雅典:奥对民主的挑战","authors":"A. Shilo","doi":"10.1353/are.2023.a899548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article argues that through envisioning a militaristic, unanimous Athens, the Eumenides presents a novel and provocative political theory. I use political theology to clarify the structures and dangers of this concluding vision, which profoundly diverges from Athenian democracy. However, still meaningfully operative within the Oresteia are checking forces implied in its polytheism, plural values, and political structures. These mirror Athenian society and manifest the trilogy's internal critique of unanimity. The interplay of unanimity and plurality enables us to better understand the trilogy, ask new questions about early democratic thought, and confront the monotheistic assumptions of modern political theology.","PeriodicalId":44750,"journal":{"name":"ARETHUSA","volume":"56 1","pages":"27 - 75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unanimous Gods, Unanimous Athens: The Oresteia's Challenge to Democracy\",\"authors\":\"A. Shilo\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/are.2023.a899548\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This article argues that through envisioning a militaristic, unanimous Athens, the Eumenides presents a novel and provocative political theory. I use political theology to clarify the structures and dangers of this concluding vision, which profoundly diverges from Athenian democracy. However, still meaningfully operative within the Oresteia are checking forces implied in its polytheism, plural values, and political structures. These mirror Athenian society and manifest the trilogy's internal critique of unanimity. The interplay of unanimity and plurality enables us to better understand the trilogy, ask new questions about early democratic thought, and confront the monotheistic assumptions of modern political theology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44750,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ARETHUSA\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"27 - 75\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ARETHUSA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/are.2023.a899548\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"CLASSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARETHUSA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/are.2023.a899548","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本文认为,《欧门尼德斯》通过对一个军国主义的、一致的雅典的设想,提出了一种新颖的、具有挑衅性的政治理论。我用政治神学来澄清这一结论的结构和危险,它与雅典民主有着深刻的分歧。然而,在奥瑞斯泰亚内部,仍然有意义地发挥作用的是制约其多神论、多元价值观和政治结构中隐含的力量。这些反映了雅典社会,体现了三部曲对全体一致的内在批判。一致和多元的相互作用使我们能够更好地理解三部曲,对早期民主思想提出新的问题,并面对现代政治神学的一神论假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Unanimous Gods, Unanimous Athens: The Oresteia's Challenge to Democracy
Abstract:This article argues that through envisioning a militaristic, unanimous Athens, the Eumenides presents a novel and provocative political theory. I use political theology to clarify the structures and dangers of this concluding vision, which profoundly diverges from Athenian democracy. However, still meaningfully operative within the Oresteia are checking forces implied in its polytheism, plural values, and political structures. These mirror Athenian society and manifest the trilogy's internal critique of unanimity. The interplay of unanimity and plurality enables us to better understand the trilogy, ask new questions about early democratic thought, and confront the monotheistic assumptions of modern political theology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ARETHUSA
ARETHUSA CLASSICS-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊介绍: Arethusa is known for publishing original literary and cultural studies of the ancient world and of the field of classics that combine contemporary theoretical perspectives with more traditional approaches to literary and material evidence. Interdisciplinary in nature, this distinguished journal often features special thematic issues.
期刊最新文献
A New Musical Helen Musical Structure in Greek Tragedy: Introduction Performing Aeschylus's Persians Musical Structure and the Interpretability of Agamemnon 1513–20 From the Editor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1