复合材料代替钢材对装甲车辆车身设计的影响

Majid Khaleel Najem, E. Karash, J. Sultan
{"title":"复合材料代替钢材对装甲车辆车身设计的影响","authors":"Majid Khaleel Najem, E. Karash, J. Sultan","doi":"10.18280/rcma.320101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, the amount of excess weight resulting from the design of a mathematical model composed of composite materials will be calculated and compared with a mathematical model of an armored steel structure. Five different models were designed, one of which is made of steel, the other part is made of composite materials, and a section of steel and composite materials, and then tested for resistance to stresses and compared the weight of each structure with that of the steel component by taking the maximum stress as a basic criterion for weight comparison. The results showed that the best model was the second model fiberglass, where the percentage of weight loss was compared to the steel model (73.77%), in addition to the wall thickness (62 mm) and the wall thickness of the steel model with which the comparison was (60 mm), but the displacement is (7. 24 mm), and in the steel model it is (1.827 mm). The best model compared to steel in terms of resistance to maximum stress, less displacement and less weight was the model consisting of steel with carbon fiber and its thickness was (47 layers& 57 mm, 2 layer & 10 mm steel and 45 layer & 45 mm carbon fiber), and the percentage of weight loss compared to the first mathematical model (60.96%). The results of this research may be a key to obtaining alternative materials for traditional materials in the manufacture of armored hulls, aircraft and ships, and it has a lower weight.","PeriodicalId":42458,"journal":{"name":"Revue des Composites et des Materiaux Avances-Journal of Composite and Advanced Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Amount of Excess Weight from the Design of an Armored Vehicle Body by Using Composite Materials Instead of Steel\",\"authors\":\"Majid Khaleel Najem, E. Karash, J. Sultan\",\"doi\":\"10.18280/rcma.320101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, the amount of excess weight resulting from the design of a mathematical model composed of composite materials will be calculated and compared with a mathematical model of an armored steel structure. Five different models were designed, one of which is made of steel, the other part is made of composite materials, and a section of steel and composite materials, and then tested for resistance to stresses and compared the weight of each structure with that of the steel component by taking the maximum stress as a basic criterion for weight comparison. The results showed that the best model was the second model fiberglass, where the percentage of weight loss was compared to the steel model (73.77%), in addition to the wall thickness (62 mm) and the wall thickness of the steel model with which the comparison was (60 mm), but the displacement is (7. 24 mm), and in the steel model it is (1.827 mm). The best model compared to steel in terms of resistance to maximum stress, less displacement and less weight was the model consisting of steel with carbon fiber and its thickness was (47 layers& 57 mm, 2 layer & 10 mm steel and 45 layer & 45 mm carbon fiber), and the percentage of weight loss compared to the first mathematical model (60.96%). The results of this research may be a key to obtaining alternative materials for traditional materials in the manufacture of armored hulls, aircraft and ships, and it has a lower weight.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42458,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revue des Composites et des Materiaux Avances-Journal of Composite and Advanced Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revue des Composites et des Materiaux Avances-Journal of Composite and Advanced Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18280/rcma.320101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, COMPOSITES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revue des Composites et des Materiaux Avances-Journal of Composite and Advanced Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18280/rcma.320101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, COMPOSITES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文将计算由复合材料组成的数学模型设计产生的超重量,并与装甲钢结构的数学模型进行比较。设计了五种不同的模型,其中一种是钢结构,另一种是复合材料,一种是钢和复合材料的截面,然后进行了抗应力测试,并将每个结构的重量与钢构件的重量进行了比较,以最大应力作为重量比较的基本准则。结果表明,最佳模型为第二模型玻璃纤维,其减重率较钢模型为73.77%,且壁厚为62 mm,与之比较的钢模型壁厚为60 mm,但位移为7。24mm),钢制模型为(1.827 mm)。在抗最大应力、最小位移和最小重量方面优于钢的模型是钢与碳纤维组成的模型,其厚度为(47层+ 57 mm, 2层+ 10 mm钢,45层+ 45 mm碳纤维),与第一个数学模型相比,减重率为60.96%。该研究结果可能是在装甲船体、飞机和船舶制造中获得传统材料替代材料的关键,并且具有较低的重量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Amount of Excess Weight from the Design of an Armored Vehicle Body by Using Composite Materials Instead of Steel
In this paper, the amount of excess weight resulting from the design of a mathematical model composed of composite materials will be calculated and compared with a mathematical model of an armored steel structure. Five different models were designed, one of which is made of steel, the other part is made of composite materials, and a section of steel and composite materials, and then tested for resistance to stresses and compared the weight of each structure with that of the steel component by taking the maximum stress as a basic criterion for weight comparison. The results showed that the best model was the second model fiberglass, where the percentage of weight loss was compared to the steel model (73.77%), in addition to the wall thickness (62 mm) and the wall thickness of the steel model with which the comparison was (60 mm), but the displacement is (7. 24 mm), and in the steel model it is (1.827 mm). The best model compared to steel in terms of resistance to maximum stress, less displacement and less weight was the model consisting of steel with carbon fiber and its thickness was (47 layers& 57 mm, 2 layer & 10 mm steel and 45 layer & 45 mm carbon fiber), and the percentage of weight loss compared to the first mathematical model (60.96%). The results of this research may be a key to obtaining alternative materials for traditional materials in the manufacture of armored hulls, aircraft and ships, and it has a lower weight.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
25.00%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
Optimizing PVD Coating Parameters for Ti6Al4V Alloy Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printed PETG Samples: The Effect of Varying Infill Patterns Investigating Shearing, Ploughing, and Particle Fracture Forces in Turning of Low Percent Reinforcement Al/B4C Metal Matrix Composites Effect of Cu-Doping Levels on the Structural and Optical Properties of SnO2 Thin Films Prepared by Chemical Spray Pyrolysis Preparation and Characterization of CdS Thin Films at Varying Molarities Using Chemical Spray Pyrolysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1