Andres Patrignani, Behzad Ghanbarian, Gerard J. Kluitenberg, Nathaniel Parker
{"title":"基于渗流的有效介质近似模型估算土壤导热系数的验证","authors":"Andres Patrignani, Behzad Ghanbarian, Gerard J. Kluitenberg, Nathaniel Parker","doi":"10.1002/saj2.20585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Soil thermal conductivity (λ) has broad applications in soil science, hydrology, and engineering. In this study, we applied the percolation-based effective-medium approximation (P-EMA) to estimate the saturation dependence of thermal conductivity (<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>λ</mi>\n <mo>(</mo>\n <mi>θ</mi>\n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$\\lambda ( \\theta )$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>) using data from 38 undisturbed soil samples collected across the state of Kansas. The P-EMA model has four parameters including a scaling exponent (<i>t</i><sub>s</sub>), critical water content (θ<sub>c</sub>), and thermal conductivities at oven-dry (λ<sub>dry</sub>) and full saturation (λ<sub>sat</sub>) conditions. To estimate the <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>λ</mi>\n <mo>−</mo>\n <mi>θ</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$\\lambda - \\theta $</annotation>\n </semantics></math> curve, the values of λ<sub>dry</sub> and λ<sub>sat</sub> were measured using a soil thermal properties analyzer and the values of <i>t</i><sub>s</sub> and θ<sub>c</sub> were estimated as a function of clay content. Thermal conductivity was also estimated using the Johansen model. By comparison with observations, the P-EMA model resulted in a root mean square error (RMSE) ranging from 0.029 to 0.158 W m<sup>−1</sup> K<sup>−1</sup>, whereas the Johansen model had an RMSE ranging from 0.021 to 0.173 W m<sup>−1</sup> K<sup>−1</sup>. Our results demonstrate that the P-EMA model has comparable accuracy to the widely used Johansen model to estimate the saturation-dependent soil thermal conductivity of undisturbed soils with minimal input parameters. Future studies should focus on better understanding the physical meaning of <i>t</i><sub>s</sub> and θ<sub>c</sub> in the P-EMA model to improve our ability to model thermal conductivity in undisturbed soil from percolation principles.</p>","PeriodicalId":101043,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","volume":"87 6","pages":"1275-1284"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the percolation-based effective-medium approximation model to estimate soil thermal conductivity\",\"authors\":\"Andres Patrignani, Behzad Ghanbarian, Gerard J. Kluitenberg, Nathaniel Parker\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/saj2.20585\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Soil thermal conductivity (λ) has broad applications in soil science, hydrology, and engineering. In this study, we applied the percolation-based effective-medium approximation (P-EMA) to estimate the saturation dependence of thermal conductivity (<span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>λ</mi>\\n <mo>(</mo>\\n <mi>θ</mi>\\n <mo>)</mo>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$\\\\lambda ( \\\\theta )$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>) using data from 38 undisturbed soil samples collected across the state of Kansas. The P-EMA model has four parameters including a scaling exponent (<i>t</i><sub>s</sub>), critical water content (θ<sub>c</sub>), and thermal conductivities at oven-dry (λ<sub>dry</sub>) and full saturation (λ<sub>sat</sub>) conditions. To estimate the <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>λ</mi>\\n <mo>−</mo>\\n <mi>θ</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$\\\\lambda - \\\\theta $</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> curve, the values of λ<sub>dry</sub> and λ<sub>sat</sub> were measured using a soil thermal properties analyzer and the values of <i>t</i><sub>s</sub> and θ<sub>c</sub> were estimated as a function of clay content. Thermal conductivity was also estimated using the Johansen model. By comparison with observations, the P-EMA model resulted in a root mean square error (RMSE) ranging from 0.029 to 0.158 W m<sup>−1</sup> K<sup>−1</sup>, whereas the Johansen model had an RMSE ranging from 0.021 to 0.173 W m<sup>−1</sup> K<sup>−1</sup>. Our results demonstrate that the P-EMA model has comparable accuracy to the widely used Johansen model to estimate the saturation-dependent soil thermal conductivity of undisturbed soils with minimal input parameters. Future studies should focus on better understanding the physical meaning of <i>t</i><sub>s</sub> and θ<sub>c</sub> in the P-EMA model to improve our ability to model thermal conductivity in undisturbed soil from percolation principles.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America\",\"volume\":\"87 6\",\"pages\":\"1275-1284\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/saj2.20585\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/saj2.20585","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
P‐EMA模型,以提高我们根据渗流原理模拟原状土壤热导率的能力。使用基于渗流的有效介质近似(P-EMA)模型估算土壤热导率。我们使用了38个未扰动土壤样本中测得的土壤热特性数据集。P‐EMA模型的均方根误差(RMSE)范围为0.029至0.158 W m−1 K−1,与广泛使用的Johansen模型相似。本文受版权保护。保留所有权利
Validation of the percolation-based effective-medium approximation model to estimate soil thermal conductivity
Soil thermal conductivity (λ) has broad applications in soil science, hydrology, and engineering. In this study, we applied the percolation-based effective-medium approximation (P-EMA) to estimate the saturation dependence of thermal conductivity () using data from 38 undisturbed soil samples collected across the state of Kansas. The P-EMA model has four parameters including a scaling exponent (ts), critical water content (θc), and thermal conductivities at oven-dry (λdry) and full saturation (λsat) conditions. To estimate the curve, the values of λdry and λsat were measured using a soil thermal properties analyzer and the values of ts and θc were estimated as a function of clay content. Thermal conductivity was also estimated using the Johansen model. By comparison with observations, the P-EMA model resulted in a root mean square error (RMSE) ranging from 0.029 to 0.158 W m−1 K−1, whereas the Johansen model had an RMSE ranging from 0.021 to 0.173 W m−1 K−1. Our results demonstrate that the P-EMA model has comparable accuracy to the widely used Johansen model to estimate the saturation-dependent soil thermal conductivity of undisturbed soils with minimal input parameters. Future studies should focus on better understanding the physical meaning of ts and θc in the P-EMA model to improve our ability to model thermal conductivity in undisturbed soil from percolation principles.