霍布斯政治专制主义下的自由观念

Delmo Mattos, E. Ramos
{"title":"霍布斯政治专制主义下的自由观念","authors":"Delmo Mattos, E. Ramos","doi":"10.5216/PHI.V22I2.50365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main purpose of this article is to examine the terms of freedom in Hobbes, using the sense of freedom, sometimes attributed to the way the philosopher sees its position on freedom, through the discussions of Quentin Skinner about the design \"neo-Roman\" of freedom or liberty republican. Based on this assumption, do you want to show how the modern conception of freedom is entirely dependent on the construction of the hobbesian \"freedom negative\", directly influenced by a political debate that occurred in England in the mid 17th century. On this basis, the heart of the discussions that will be undertaken in this article concerns the critique hobbesian freedom republican as a prerequisite to demonstrate the development of the modern conception of freedom. Once examined this relationship is, therefore, possible to highlight the important aspects of liberalism in the political argument of Hobbes.","PeriodicalId":30368,"journal":{"name":"Philosophos Revista de Filosofia","volume":"22 1","pages":"81-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"O SENTIDO LIBERAL DA CONCEPÇÃO DE LIBERDADE NO ÂMBITO DO ABSOLUTISMO POLÍTICO DE HOBBES\",\"authors\":\"Delmo Mattos, E. Ramos\",\"doi\":\"10.5216/PHI.V22I2.50365\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The main purpose of this article is to examine the terms of freedom in Hobbes, using the sense of freedom, sometimes attributed to the way the philosopher sees its position on freedom, through the discussions of Quentin Skinner about the design \\\"neo-Roman\\\" of freedom or liberty republican. Based on this assumption, do you want to show how the modern conception of freedom is entirely dependent on the construction of the hobbesian \\\"freedom negative\\\", directly influenced by a political debate that occurred in England in the mid 17th century. On this basis, the heart of the discussions that will be undertaken in this article concerns the critique hobbesian freedom republican as a prerequisite to demonstrate the development of the modern conception of freedom. Once examined this relationship is, therefore, possible to highlight the important aspects of liberalism in the political argument of Hobbes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30368,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philosophos Revista de Filosofia\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"81-81\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philosophos Revista de Filosofia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5216/PHI.V22I2.50365\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophos Revista de Filosofia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5216/PHI.V22I2.50365","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的主要目的是通过对昆汀·斯金纳关于自由的“新罗马”设计或自由共和主义的讨论,利用自由的意义(有时被认为是哲学家看待其对自由的立场的方式)来考察霍布斯的自由术语。基于这一假设,你想展示现代自由概念是如何完全依赖于霍布斯的“消极自由”的构建,直接受到17世纪中期发生在英国的政治辩论的影响吗?在此基础上,本文讨论的核心是将霍布斯的自由共和主义批判作为展示现代自由概念发展的先决条件。因此,一旦考察了这种关系,就有可能在霍布斯的政治论证中突出自由主义的重要方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
O SENTIDO LIBERAL DA CONCEPÇÃO DE LIBERDADE NO ÂMBITO DO ABSOLUTISMO POLÍTICO DE HOBBES
The main purpose of this article is to examine the terms of freedom in Hobbes, using the sense of freedom, sometimes attributed to the way the philosopher sees its position on freedom, through the discussions of Quentin Skinner about the design "neo-Roman" of freedom or liberty republican. Based on this assumption, do you want to show how the modern conception of freedom is entirely dependent on the construction of the hobbesian "freedom negative", directly influenced by a political debate that occurred in England in the mid 17th century. On this basis, the heart of the discussions that will be undertaken in this article concerns the critique hobbesian freedom republican as a prerequisite to demonstrate the development of the modern conception of freedom. Once examined this relationship is, therefore, possible to highlight the important aspects of liberalism in the political argument of Hobbes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Tropeços da igualdade no caminho da natureza à civilidade Quatro formas de silenciamento fundamento moral à forma da normatividade Descartes: a dúvida e suas dívidas A relevância da distinção kantiana entre virtude e boa vontade para o debate contemporâneo sobre a ética das virtudes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1