即使是安全的儿童之家也不会收留我。孩子们被安置在其他住处

IF 1 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Residential Treatment for Children & Youth Pub Date : 2022-03-17 DOI:10.1080/0886571X.2022.2044431
A. Williams, A. Cummings, D. Forrester, H. Hodges, N. Warner, S. Wood
{"title":"即使是安全的儿童之家也不会收留我。孩子们被安置在其他住处","authors":"A. Williams, A. Cummings, D. Forrester, H. Hodges, N. Warner, S. Wood","doi":"10.1080/0886571X.2022.2044431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Secure Children’s Homes (SCH) in the UK are locked establishments for children perceived to be at serious risk and referred through welfare or youth justice systems. The UK SCH population has recently decreased, but the percentage accommodated for welfare concerns has not. It is of concern that some of the children referred to SCHs through the welfare system cannot be placed and are therefore found an alternative accommodation. This article is concerned with children from England referred to SCHs for welfare reasons particularly the process of trying to find a SCH place, the characteristics of children placed in alternative accommodations and the residences used for alternative accommodation. Findings show that two-fifths of the children, typically older males with challenging, offending, or sexually harmful behaviors were not placed in a SCH. While the children’s behaviors contributed to SCH refusals, the situations were more nuanced with other contributory factors including children not meeting secure accommodation criteria, non-implementation of secure orders and children entering different secure settings. The study returns attention to the difficulty of finding an SCH place for extremely vulnerable children and raises concerns about current SCH service capacity and the unknown nature of alternative accommodations.","PeriodicalId":45491,"journal":{"name":"Residential Treatment for Children & Youth","volume":"39 1","pages":"370 - 386"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Even Secure Children’s Homes Won’t Take Me. Children Placed in Alternative Accommodation\",\"authors\":\"A. Williams, A. Cummings, D. Forrester, H. Hodges, N. Warner, S. Wood\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0886571X.2022.2044431\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Secure Children’s Homes (SCH) in the UK are locked establishments for children perceived to be at serious risk and referred through welfare or youth justice systems. The UK SCH population has recently decreased, but the percentage accommodated for welfare concerns has not. It is of concern that some of the children referred to SCHs through the welfare system cannot be placed and are therefore found an alternative accommodation. This article is concerned with children from England referred to SCHs for welfare reasons particularly the process of trying to find a SCH place, the characteristics of children placed in alternative accommodations and the residences used for alternative accommodation. Findings show that two-fifths of the children, typically older males with challenging, offending, or sexually harmful behaviors were not placed in a SCH. While the children’s behaviors contributed to SCH refusals, the situations were more nuanced with other contributory factors including children not meeting secure accommodation criteria, non-implementation of secure orders and children entering different secure settings. The study returns attention to the difficulty of finding an SCH place for extremely vulnerable children and raises concerns about current SCH service capacity and the unknown nature of alternative accommodations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45491,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Residential Treatment for Children & Youth\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"370 - 386\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Residential Treatment for Children & Youth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0886571X.2022.2044431\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Residential Treatment for Children & Youth","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0886571X.2022.2044431","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:英国的安全儿童之家(SCH)是为被认为面临严重风险并通过福利或青少年司法系统转介的儿童设立的封闭场所。英国的SCH人口最近有所下降,但出于福利考虑的比例并没有下降。令人关切的是,通过福利制度转介到SCH的一些儿童无法安置,因此无法找到替代住所。本文关注的是出于福利原因被转介到SCH的英国儿童,特别是试图找到SCH场所的过程,被安置在替代住所的儿童的特征以及用于替代住所的住所。研究结果显示,五分之二的儿童,通常是有挑战性、冒犯性或性伤害行为的年长男性,没有被纳入SCH。虽然儿童的行为导致了SCH拒绝,但情况与其他因素更为微妙,包括儿童不符合安全住宿标准、未执行安全命令以及儿童进入不同的安全环境。该研究再次关注为极易受伤害的儿童寻找SCH场所的困难,并引发了对当前SCH服务能力和替代住宿未知性质的担忧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Even Secure Children’s Homes Won’t Take Me. Children Placed in Alternative Accommodation
ABSTRACT Secure Children’s Homes (SCH) in the UK are locked establishments for children perceived to be at serious risk and referred through welfare or youth justice systems. The UK SCH population has recently decreased, but the percentage accommodated for welfare concerns has not. It is of concern that some of the children referred to SCHs through the welfare system cannot be placed and are therefore found an alternative accommodation. This article is concerned with children from England referred to SCHs for welfare reasons particularly the process of trying to find a SCH place, the characteristics of children placed in alternative accommodations and the residences used for alternative accommodation. Findings show that two-fifths of the children, typically older males with challenging, offending, or sexually harmful behaviors were not placed in a SCH. While the children’s behaviors contributed to SCH refusals, the situations were more nuanced with other contributory factors including children not meeting secure accommodation criteria, non-implementation of secure orders and children entering different secure settings. The study returns attention to the difficulty of finding an SCH place for extremely vulnerable children and raises concerns about current SCH service capacity and the unknown nature of alternative accommodations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
33.30%
发文量
27
期刊最新文献
Trauma–Sensitive Residential Care: Perspectives of Portuguese Professionals to Spark Change Guest Editors’ Note Mapping the Journey to Success: Key Characteristics of Male Youths Benefiting the Most from Therapeutic Residential Care After One Year of Intervention Knowledge of Autism and Attitudes Toward Autistic Children: Evaluation of Child Protection Service Staff in Türkiye From Distancing to Connecting: Residential Care Engagement with External Stakeholders Amidst COVID-19. An Italian Investigation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1