竞争性土地权益:曼尼普尔的习惯索赔、土地所有权和正式法律,约1890年至1990年

IF 0.1 Q4 AREA STUDIES History and Sociology of South Asia Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1177/22308075211059572
L. Haokip
{"title":"竞争性土地权益:曼尼普尔的习惯索赔、土地所有权和正式法律,约1890年至1990年","authors":"L. Haokip","doi":"10.1177/22308075211059572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article provides a long-term perspective on the history of land tenure for over a century in the colonial and post-colonial eras of Manipur, India. Modernisation theory assumes too rigid division between traditional and modern attributes of land laws. The article, however, endorses the view that ‘the Anglo-Indian legal system was distinctly Janus-faced and rested on two contradictory principles’ of public law and personal law (D. A. Washbrook, Modern Asian Studies 15, no. 3 [1981]: 653). The flagship land legislation of Manipur (MLR & LR Act 1960) has been framed within the hill–valley framework. But the hill–valley binary of this public law provided too rigid mechanism to understand the history of legal formalisation. In theory, statutory (public) laws in land apply to only the valley areas of Manipur and customary (personal) law applies to the hill areas. But in practice, there exist different degrees of legal formality.","PeriodicalId":41287,"journal":{"name":"History and Sociology of South Asia","volume":"14 1","pages":"22 - 38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Competing Landed Interests: Customary Claims, Land Titles and Formal Law in Manipur, Circa 1890–1990\",\"authors\":\"L. Haokip\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/22308075211059572\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article provides a long-term perspective on the history of land tenure for over a century in the colonial and post-colonial eras of Manipur, India. Modernisation theory assumes too rigid division between traditional and modern attributes of land laws. The article, however, endorses the view that ‘the Anglo-Indian legal system was distinctly Janus-faced and rested on two contradictory principles’ of public law and personal law (D. A. Washbrook, Modern Asian Studies 15, no. 3 [1981]: 653). The flagship land legislation of Manipur (MLR & LR Act 1960) has been framed within the hill–valley framework. But the hill–valley binary of this public law provided too rigid mechanism to understand the history of legal formalisation. In theory, statutory (public) laws in land apply to only the valley areas of Manipur and customary (personal) law applies to the hill areas. But in practice, there exist different degrees of legal formality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41287,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"History and Sociology of South Asia\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"22 - 38\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"History and Sociology of South Asia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/22308075211059572\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History and Sociology of South Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22308075211059572","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文对印度曼尼普尔殖民地和后殖民时代一个多世纪的土地保有权历史进行了长期的研究。现代化理论假定土地法的传统属性和现代属性之间存在过于僵化的划分。然而,这篇文章赞同这样一种观点,即“英印法律体系明显是Janus所面对的,并建立在公法和属人法这两个相互矛盾的原则之上”(D.A.Washbrook,《现代亚洲研究》第15期,第3期[1981]:653)。曼尼普尔邦的旗舰土地立法(1960年MLR&LR法案)是在丘陵-山谷框架内制定的。但这部公法的山谷二元性为理解法律形式化的历史提供了过于僵化的机制。理论上,土地上的成文(公共)法仅适用于曼尼普尔山谷地区,习惯(属人)法适用于山区。但在实践中,存在着不同程度的法律形式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Competing Landed Interests: Customary Claims, Land Titles and Formal Law in Manipur, Circa 1890–1990
This article provides a long-term perspective on the history of land tenure for over a century in the colonial and post-colonial eras of Manipur, India. Modernisation theory assumes too rigid division between traditional and modern attributes of land laws. The article, however, endorses the view that ‘the Anglo-Indian legal system was distinctly Janus-faced and rested on two contradictory principles’ of public law and personal law (D. A. Washbrook, Modern Asian Studies 15, no. 3 [1981]: 653). The flagship land legislation of Manipur (MLR & LR Act 1960) has been framed within the hill–valley framework. But the hill–valley binary of this public law provided too rigid mechanism to understand the history of legal formalisation. In theory, statutory (public) laws in land apply to only the valley areas of Manipur and customary (personal) law applies to the hill areas. But in practice, there exist different degrees of legal formality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: History and Sociology of South Asia provides a forum for scholarly interrogations of significant moments in the transformation of the social, economic and political fabric of South Asian societies. Thus the journal advisedly presents an interdisciplinary space in which contemporary ideas compete, and critiques of existing perspectives are encouraged. The interdisciplinary focus of the journal enables it to incorporate diverse areas of research, including political economy, social ecology, and issues of minority rights, gender, and the role of law in development. History and Sociology of South Asia also promotes dialogue on socio-political problems, from which academicians as well as activists and advocacy groups can benefit.
期刊最新文献
Women’s Education: Curriculum and Content in the Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries India Examining the Impact of Forest Policies on Sacred Groves in India: A Historical Review Kunal Debnath, Caste, Marginalisation, and Resistance: The Politics of Identity of the Naths (Yogis) of Bengal and Assam. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill, 2024, xx + 240 pp. €131, ISBN: 9789004689374 (Hardback) Building Construction In Princely State Bikaner: Form, Style And Architecture Core Health and Living Stress Among Older People
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1