歧视和复原力对出生体重的作用:对黑人、拉丁裔和白人女性样本的系统检查

IF 2.7 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Womens Health Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17455057221093927
K. Mickelson, P. Doehrman, C. Chambers, Hayley D. Seely, Marianna Kaneris, Rachel Stancl, Chelsea E Stewart, Shea Sullivan
{"title":"歧视和复原力对出生体重的作用:对黑人、拉丁裔和白人女性样本的系统检查","authors":"K. Mickelson, P. Doehrman, C. Chambers, Hayley D. Seely, Marianna Kaneris, Rachel Stancl, Chelsea E Stewart, Shea Sullivan","doi":"10.1177/17455057221093927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Health inequities begin before birth with Black women being more likely to have low birth weight babies than White and Latina women. Although both Latina and Black women experience discrimination, only Black women appear to be affected. Methods: In this study using medical records and face-to-face interviews, we systematically examined the role of discrimination (daily, environmental, vicarious) on continuous birth weight (controlling for gestational age and baby’s gender) in a sample of 329 Black, Latina, and White pregnant women, as well as whether familism, prayer, and/or discrimination attribution buffered this association. Results: Linear regression analyses revealed that only prayer acted as a resilience factor, with Latina women appearing to benefit from prayer in the link between vicarious and daily discrimination on birth weight conditional on gestational age, whereas Black women showed no moderation and White women showed an exacerbation in the link. Discussion: The results of this study suggest that sociocultural norms may play a role in explaining the Latina epidemiological paradox, but more research is needed to understand the significance.","PeriodicalId":47398,"journal":{"name":"Womens Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Role of discrimination and resilience on birth weight: A systematic examination in a sample of Black, Latina, and White women\",\"authors\":\"K. Mickelson, P. Doehrman, C. Chambers, Hayley D. Seely, Marianna Kaneris, Rachel Stancl, Chelsea E Stewart, Shea Sullivan\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17455057221093927\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Health inequities begin before birth with Black women being more likely to have low birth weight babies than White and Latina women. Although both Latina and Black women experience discrimination, only Black women appear to be affected. Methods: In this study using medical records and face-to-face interviews, we systematically examined the role of discrimination (daily, environmental, vicarious) on continuous birth weight (controlling for gestational age and baby’s gender) in a sample of 329 Black, Latina, and White pregnant women, as well as whether familism, prayer, and/or discrimination attribution buffered this association. Results: Linear regression analyses revealed that only prayer acted as a resilience factor, with Latina women appearing to benefit from prayer in the link between vicarious and daily discrimination on birth weight conditional on gestational age, whereas Black women showed no moderation and White women showed an exacerbation in the link. Discussion: The results of this study suggest that sociocultural norms may play a role in explaining the Latina epidemiological paradox, but more research is needed to understand the significance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47398,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Womens Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Womens Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17455057221093927\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Womens Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17455057221093927","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

引言:健康不平等始于出生前,黑人女性比白人和拉丁裔女性更有可能生下低出生体重的婴儿。尽管拉丁裔和黑人女性都受到歧视,但似乎只有黑人女性受到影响。方法:在这项使用医疗记录和面对面访谈的研究中,我们系统地检查了歧视(日常、环境、替代)对329名黑人、拉丁裔和白人孕妇的连续出生体重(控制胎龄和婴儿性别)的作用,以及家庭主义、祈祷、,和/或歧视归因缓冲了这种关联。结果:线性回归分析显示,只有祈祷才是一个恢复因素,拉丁裔女性似乎从祈祷中受益,因为代孕和以胎龄为条件的出生体重日常歧视之间存在联系,而黑人女性则没有表现出适度性,白人女性则表现出这种联系的恶化。讨论:这项研究的结果表明,社会文化规范可能在解释拉丁裔流行病学悖论中发挥作用,但还需要更多的研究来理解其意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Role of discrimination and resilience on birth weight: A systematic examination in a sample of Black, Latina, and White women
Introduction: Health inequities begin before birth with Black women being more likely to have low birth weight babies than White and Latina women. Although both Latina and Black women experience discrimination, only Black women appear to be affected. Methods: In this study using medical records and face-to-face interviews, we systematically examined the role of discrimination (daily, environmental, vicarious) on continuous birth weight (controlling for gestational age and baby’s gender) in a sample of 329 Black, Latina, and White pregnant women, as well as whether familism, prayer, and/or discrimination attribution buffered this association. Results: Linear regression analyses revealed that only prayer acted as a resilience factor, with Latina women appearing to benefit from prayer in the link between vicarious and daily discrimination on birth weight conditional on gestational age, whereas Black women showed no moderation and White women showed an exacerbation in the link. Discussion: The results of this study suggest that sociocultural norms may play a role in explaining the Latina epidemiological paradox, but more research is needed to understand the significance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Womens Health
Womens Health OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: For many diseases, women’s physiology and life-cycle hormonal changes demand important consideration when determining healthcare management options. Age- and gender-related factors can directly affect treatment outcomes, and differences between the clinical management of, say, an adolescent female and that in a pre- or postmenopausal patient may be either subtle or profound. At the same time, there are certain conditions that are far more prevalent in women than men, and these may require special attention. Furthermore, in an increasingly aged population in which women demonstrate a greater life-expectancy.
期刊最新文献
Prevalence and determinants of the involvement of married men in family planning services in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis A survey of women’s experiences of using period tracker applications: Attitudes, ovulation prediction and how the accuracy of the app in predicting period start dates affects their feelings and behaviours ‘It feels like my visibility matters’: Women ageing with HIV overcoming the ‘violence of invisibility’ through community, advocacy and the radical act of care for others HIV prevention – Challenges in reaching Libyan women: A narrative review Multilevel analysis of factors associated with utilization of institutional delivery in Ethiopia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1