创造标准:我们作为研究人员的秘密工作

D. Spitzberg
{"title":"创造标准:我们作为研究人员的秘密工作","authors":"D. Spitzberg","doi":"10.1145/3615670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"challenges for software professionals, and like most of my peers, I want to do ethical work. I aspire to help coworkers design and develop useful software products and positive experiences for users, and, where possible, to help users advocate for themselves. But recently, advocating for ethics has become a research duty on its own. “Ethical AI” is appearing everywhere, from company marketing materials to individual LinkedIn profiles, with little hope of improving tech governance. My goal in this article is to argue that researchers do our best work influencing software production and guiding tech governance not by Designing and developing software involves making claims about what users want. In the early years of personal computing, central claims about user goals, desires, and everyday life came from psychologists, anthropologists, and other social scientists who collaborated with technologists in innovation centers like Xerox PARC [1]. In the past decade, however, the widespread adoption of software and massive growth in the industry came with a new professional title: the user experience (UX) researcher. In my day job, I am one of tens of thousands of UX researchers working in the software industry. Researching D Creating Standards: Our Secret Job as Researchers Danny Spitzberg, Georgia Institute of Technology","PeriodicalId":73404,"journal":{"name":"Interactions (New York, N.Y.)","volume":"30 1","pages":"39 - 43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Creating Standards: Our Secret Job as Researchers\",\"authors\":\"D. Spitzberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3615670\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"challenges for software professionals, and like most of my peers, I want to do ethical work. I aspire to help coworkers design and develop useful software products and positive experiences for users, and, where possible, to help users advocate for themselves. But recently, advocating for ethics has become a research duty on its own. “Ethical AI” is appearing everywhere, from company marketing materials to individual LinkedIn profiles, with little hope of improving tech governance. My goal in this article is to argue that researchers do our best work influencing software production and guiding tech governance not by Designing and developing software involves making claims about what users want. In the early years of personal computing, central claims about user goals, desires, and everyday life came from psychologists, anthropologists, and other social scientists who collaborated with technologists in innovation centers like Xerox PARC [1]. In the past decade, however, the widespread adoption of software and massive growth in the industry came with a new professional title: the user experience (UX) researcher. In my day job, I am one of tens of thousands of UX researchers working in the software industry. Researching D Creating Standards: Our Secret Job as Researchers Danny Spitzberg, Georgia Institute of Technology\",\"PeriodicalId\":73404,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interactions (New York, N.Y.)\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"39 - 43\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interactions (New York, N.Y.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3615670\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interactions (New York, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3615670","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

软件专业人士面临的挑战,和我的大多数同龄人一样,我想做合乎道德的工作。我渴望帮助同事为用户设计和开发有用的软件产品和积极的体验,并在可能的情况下帮助用户为自己辩护。但最近,倡导伦理已经成为一项独立的研究职责。“道德人工智能”无处不在,从公司营销材料到个人LinkedIn个人资料,改善技术治理的希望渺茫。我在这篇文章中的目标是认为,研究人员尽最大努力影响软件生产和指导技术治理,而不是通过设计和开发软件来声明用户想要什么。在个人计算的早期,关于用户目标、欲望和日常生活的核心主张来自心理学家、人类学家和其他社会科学家,他们与Xerox PARC[1]等创新中心的技术人员合作。然而,在过去的十年里,软件的广泛采用和行业的巨大增长带来了一个新的职业头衔:用户体验(UX)研究员。在我的日常工作中,我是成千上万在软件行业工作的用户体验研究人员之一。研究D创造标准:我们作为研究人员的秘密工作佐治亚理工学院Danny Spitzberg
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Creating Standards: Our Secret Job as Researchers
challenges for software professionals, and like most of my peers, I want to do ethical work. I aspire to help coworkers design and develop useful software products and positive experiences for users, and, where possible, to help users advocate for themselves. But recently, advocating for ethics has become a research duty on its own. “Ethical AI” is appearing everywhere, from company marketing materials to individual LinkedIn profiles, with little hope of improving tech governance. My goal in this article is to argue that researchers do our best work influencing software production and guiding tech governance not by Designing and developing software involves making claims about what users want. In the early years of personal computing, central claims about user goals, desires, and everyday life came from psychologists, anthropologists, and other social scientists who collaborated with technologists in innovation centers like Xerox PARC [1]. In the past decade, however, the widespread adoption of software and massive growth in the industry came with a new professional title: the user experience (UX) researcher. In my day job, I am one of tens of thousands of UX researchers working in the software industry. Researching D Creating Standards: Our Secret Job as Researchers Danny Spitzberg, Georgia Institute of Technology
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Jie Li Memory Bites: From Earth to Space and Back Money as an Interface Out in the Cold: Recalcitrant Robots Building Dreams Beyond Labor: Worker Autonomy in the Age of AI
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1