基于模板的微博意见摘要

IF 4.2 1区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics Pub Date : 2022-08-08 DOI:10.1162/tacl_a_00516
I. Bilal, Bo Wang, A. Tsakalidis, Dong Nguyen, R. Procter, M. Liakata
{"title":"基于模板的微博意见摘要","authors":"I. Bilal, Bo Wang, A. Tsakalidis, Dong Nguyen, R. Procter, M. Liakata","doi":"10.1162/tacl_a_00516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract We introduce the task of microblog opinion summarization (MOS) and share a dataset of 3100 gold-standard opinion summaries to facilitate research in this domain. The dataset contains summaries of tweets spanning a 2-year period and covers more topics than any other public Twitter summarization dataset. Summaries are abstractive in nature and have been created by journalists skilled in summarizing news articles following a template separating factual information (main story) from author opinions. Our method differs from previous work on generating gold-standard summaries from social media, which usually involves selecting representative posts and thus favors extractive summarization models. To showcase the dataset’s utility and challenges, we benchmark a range of abstractive and extractive state-of-the-art summarization models and achieve good performance, with the former outperforming the latter. We also show that fine-tuning is necessary to improve performance and investigate the benefits of using different sample sizes.","PeriodicalId":33559,"journal":{"name":"Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics","volume":"10 1","pages":"1229-1248"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Template-based Abstractive Microblog Opinion Summarization\",\"authors\":\"I. Bilal, Bo Wang, A. Tsakalidis, Dong Nguyen, R. Procter, M. Liakata\",\"doi\":\"10.1162/tacl_a_00516\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract We introduce the task of microblog opinion summarization (MOS) and share a dataset of 3100 gold-standard opinion summaries to facilitate research in this domain. The dataset contains summaries of tweets spanning a 2-year period and covers more topics than any other public Twitter summarization dataset. Summaries are abstractive in nature and have been created by journalists skilled in summarizing news articles following a template separating factual information (main story) from author opinions. Our method differs from previous work on generating gold-standard summaries from social media, which usually involves selecting representative posts and thus favors extractive summarization models. To showcase the dataset’s utility and challenges, we benchmark a range of abstractive and extractive state-of-the-art summarization models and achieve good performance, with the former outperforming the latter. We also show that fine-tuning is necessary to improve performance and investigate the benefits of using different sample sizes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33559,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"1229-1248\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00516\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00516","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要本文引入了微博意见摘要的任务,并分享了3100个金标准意见摘要的数据集,以促进该领域的研究。该数据集包含2年期间的tweet摘要,涵盖的主题比任何其他公共Twitter摘要数据集都多。摘要本质上是抽象的,是由熟练的记者根据将事实信息(主要故事)与作者观点分开的模板总结新闻文章而创作的。我们的方法不同于之前从社交媒体生成金标准摘要的工作,后者通常涉及选择具有代表性的帖子,因此更倾向于提取摘要模型。为了展示数据集的实用性和挑战,我们对一系列抽象和提取的最先进的总结模型进行了基准测试,并取得了良好的性能,前者的表现优于后者。我们还表明,微调是必要的,以提高性能和调查使用不同的样本大小的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Template-based Abstractive Microblog Opinion Summarization
Abstract We introduce the task of microblog opinion summarization (MOS) and share a dataset of 3100 gold-standard opinion summaries to facilitate research in this domain. The dataset contains summaries of tweets spanning a 2-year period and covers more topics than any other public Twitter summarization dataset. Summaries are abstractive in nature and have been created by journalists skilled in summarizing news articles following a template separating factual information (main story) from author opinions. Our method differs from previous work on generating gold-standard summaries from social media, which usually involves selecting representative posts and thus favors extractive summarization models. To showcase the dataset’s utility and challenges, we benchmark a range of abstractive and extractive state-of-the-art summarization models and achieve good performance, with the former outperforming the latter. We also show that fine-tuning is necessary to improve performance and investigate the benefits of using different sample sizes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
32.60
自引率
4.60%
发文量
58
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: The highly regarded quarterly journal Computational Linguistics has a companion journal called Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics. This open access journal publishes articles in all areas of natural language processing and is an important resource for academic and industry computational linguists, natural language processing experts, artificial intelligence and machine learning investigators, cognitive scientists, speech specialists, as well as linguists and philosophers. The journal disseminates work of vital relevance to these professionals on an annual basis.
期刊最新文献
General then Personal: Decoupling and Pre-training for Personalized Headline Generation MissModal: Increasing Robustness to Missing Modality in Multimodal Sentiment Analysis Removing Backdoors in Pre-trained Models by Regularized Continual Pre-training Learning More from Mixed Emotions: A Label Refinement Method for Emotion Recognition in Conversations An Efficient Self-Supervised Cross-View Training For Sentence Embedding
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1