{"title":"识别和量化与生长率同时发生变化相关的树状年表方差伪影","authors":"A. Fowler, G. Boswijk, A. Lorrey","doi":"10.3959/1536-1098-75.2.139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Expectations that a warming world will be associated with more hydro-climatological extremes has motivated research exploring if an associated signal is evident in paleoclimate archives. Tree-ring chronologies are central to this work because of their high temporal resolution, but they are also potentially compromised by variance artefacts associated with the evolving composition of the chronology and with data processing. Here we present two empirical methods to identify and quantify potential artefacts related specifically to temporally varying growth rate (local level, LL): LL-based partitioning analysis and LL-based chronology stripping. The two methods were developed and tested using a multi-site New Zealand kauri (Agathis australis) living-tree data set. Our results show that the methods are complementary in terms of artefact identification and quantification, and that they can provide useful insight into causal processes when used conjointly. Our results also indicate that data pre-processing to remove LL-related artefacts may be sub-optimal, that there may be an optimal standardization that minimizes bias, and that the evolving variance of kauri master chronologies over the last 500 years is not significantly affected by LL-related artefacts.","PeriodicalId":54416,"journal":{"name":"Tree-Ring Research","volume":"75 1","pages":"139 - 151"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"IDENTIFYING AND QUANTIFYING TREE-RING CHRONOLOGY VARIANCE ARTEFACTS RELATED TO CO-OCCURRING CHANGES IN GROWTH RATE\",\"authors\":\"A. Fowler, G. Boswijk, A. Lorrey\",\"doi\":\"10.3959/1536-1098-75.2.139\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Expectations that a warming world will be associated with more hydro-climatological extremes has motivated research exploring if an associated signal is evident in paleoclimate archives. Tree-ring chronologies are central to this work because of their high temporal resolution, but they are also potentially compromised by variance artefacts associated with the evolving composition of the chronology and with data processing. Here we present two empirical methods to identify and quantify potential artefacts related specifically to temporally varying growth rate (local level, LL): LL-based partitioning analysis and LL-based chronology stripping. The two methods were developed and tested using a multi-site New Zealand kauri (Agathis australis) living-tree data set. Our results show that the methods are complementary in terms of artefact identification and quantification, and that they can provide useful insight into causal processes when used conjointly. Our results also indicate that data pre-processing to remove LL-related artefacts may be sub-optimal, that there may be an optimal standardization that minimizes bias, and that the evolving variance of kauri master chronologies over the last 500 years is not significantly affected by LL-related artefacts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tree-Ring Research\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"139 - 151\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tree-Ring Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3959/1536-1098-75.2.139\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tree-Ring Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3959/1536-1098-75.2.139","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
IDENTIFYING AND QUANTIFYING TREE-RING CHRONOLOGY VARIANCE ARTEFACTS RELATED TO CO-OCCURRING CHANGES IN GROWTH RATE
ABSTRACT Expectations that a warming world will be associated with more hydro-climatological extremes has motivated research exploring if an associated signal is evident in paleoclimate archives. Tree-ring chronologies are central to this work because of their high temporal resolution, but they are also potentially compromised by variance artefacts associated with the evolving composition of the chronology and with data processing. Here we present two empirical methods to identify and quantify potential artefacts related specifically to temporally varying growth rate (local level, LL): LL-based partitioning analysis and LL-based chronology stripping. The two methods were developed and tested using a multi-site New Zealand kauri (Agathis australis) living-tree data set. Our results show that the methods are complementary in terms of artefact identification and quantification, and that they can provide useful insight into causal processes when used conjointly. Our results also indicate that data pre-processing to remove LL-related artefacts may be sub-optimal, that there may be an optimal standardization that minimizes bias, and that the evolving variance of kauri master chronologies over the last 500 years is not significantly affected by LL-related artefacts.
期刊介绍:
Tree-Ring Research (TRR) is devoted to papers dealing with the growth rings of trees and the applications of tree-ring research in a wide variety of fields, including but not limited to archaeology, geology, ecology, hydrology, climatology, forestry, and botany. Papers involving research results, new techniques of data acquisition or analysis, and regional or subject-oriented reviews or syntheses are considered for publication.
Scientific papers usually fall into two main categories. Articles should not exceed 5000 words, or approximately 20 double-spaced typewritten pages, including tables, references, and an abstract of 200 words or fewer. All manuscripts submitted as Articles are reviewed by at least two referees. Research Reports, which are usually reviewed by at least one outside referee, should not exceed 1500 words or include more than two figures. Research Reports address technical developments, describe well-documented but preliminary research results, or present findings for which the Article format is not appropriate. Book or monograph Reviews of 500 words or less are also considered. Other categories of papers are occasionally published. All papers are published only in English. Abstracts of the Articles or Reports may be printed in other languages if supplied by the author(s) with English translations.