提高复合型防波堤韧性的回填配置

IF 1.9 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Coastal Engineering Journal Pub Date : 2023-01-31 DOI:10.1080/21664250.2023.2167502
Ooki Kurihara, Hidenori Takahashi
{"title":"提高复合型防波堤韧性的回填配置","authors":"Ooki Kurihara, Hidenori Takahashi","doi":"10.1080/21664250.2023.2167502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Composite-type breakwaters are reinforced by piling rubble stones and constructing counterweight fillings (known as reinforcing embankments) behind caissons. Important performance requirements for breakwaters include minimal damage and high strength, even when the external forces exceed the design forces. In this study, the failure process and final state of breakwaters with reinforcing embankments are investigated via centrifuge model tests, and the cross-sectional configuration of the reinforcing embankment for improving the tenacity of breakwaters is determined. The results show that, in the overturning mode, when the number of rubble stones decreases, the reinforcing embankment deforms in accordance with the inclination of the caisson; subsequently, the caisson overturns and mounts onto the embankment. When balance is not maintained at that position, the caisson slides down the slope surface, resulting in catastrophic failure. A series of centrifuge model tests qualitatively show that placing more rubble stones adjacent to the caisson is less likely to result in such catastrophic failure. Furthermore, the stability of the breakwaters is evaluated via circular slip analyses, which demonstrate the importance of increasing the volume of the reinforcing embankment adjacent to the caisson in terms of the stability.","PeriodicalId":50673,"journal":{"name":"Coastal Engineering Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Backfilling configuration to improve tenacity of composite-type breakwaters\",\"authors\":\"Ooki Kurihara, Hidenori Takahashi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21664250.2023.2167502\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Composite-type breakwaters are reinforced by piling rubble stones and constructing counterweight fillings (known as reinforcing embankments) behind caissons. Important performance requirements for breakwaters include minimal damage and high strength, even when the external forces exceed the design forces. In this study, the failure process and final state of breakwaters with reinforcing embankments are investigated via centrifuge model tests, and the cross-sectional configuration of the reinforcing embankment for improving the tenacity of breakwaters is determined. The results show that, in the overturning mode, when the number of rubble stones decreases, the reinforcing embankment deforms in accordance with the inclination of the caisson; subsequently, the caisson overturns and mounts onto the embankment. When balance is not maintained at that position, the caisson slides down the slope surface, resulting in catastrophic failure. A series of centrifuge model tests qualitatively show that placing more rubble stones adjacent to the caisson is less likely to result in such catastrophic failure. Furthermore, the stability of the breakwaters is evaluated via circular slip analyses, which demonstrate the importance of increasing the volume of the reinforcing embankment adjacent to the caisson in terms of the stability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50673,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Coastal Engineering Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Coastal Engineering Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21664250.2023.2167502\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coastal Engineering Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21664250.2023.2167502","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

复合型防波堤是通过在沉箱后面堆放碎石和建造配重填料(称为加固路堤)来加固的。防波堤的重要性能要求包括最小损伤和高强度,即使外力超过设计力。在本研究中,通过离心模型试验研究了带加固路堤的防波堤的破坏过程和最终状态,并确定了用于提高防波堤韧性的加固路堤的横截面配置。结果表明,在倾覆模式下,当毛石数量减少时,加固路堤会随着沉箱的倾斜而变形;随后,沉箱倾覆并安装在路堤上。当这个位置没有保持平衡时,沉箱就会滑下坡面,导致灾难性的破坏。一系列离心机模型试验定性地表明,在沉箱附近放置更多的碎石不太可能导致这种灾难性的破坏。此外,通过圆滑分析对防波堤的稳定性进行了评估,证明了增加沉箱附近加固路堤体积对稳定性的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Backfilling configuration to improve tenacity of composite-type breakwaters
ABSTRACT Composite-type breakwaters are reinforced by piling rubble stones and constructing counterweight fillings (known as reinforcing embankments) behind caissons. Important performance requirements for breakwaters include minimal damage and high strength, even when the external forces exceed the design forces. In this study, the failure process and final state of breakwaters with reinforcing embankments are investigated via centrifuge model tests, and the cross-sectional configuration of the reinforcing embankment for improving the tenacity of breakwaters is determined. The results show that, in the overturning mode, when the number of rubble stones decreases, the reinforcing embankment deforms in accordance with the inclination of the caisson; subsequently, the caisson overturns and mounts onto the embankment. When balance is not maintained at that position, the caisson slides down the slope surface, resulting in catastrophic failure. A series of centrifuge model tests qualitatively show that placing more rubble stones adjacent to the caisson is less likely to result in such catastrophic failure. Furthermore, the stability of the breakwaters is evaluated via circular slip analyses, which demonstrate the importance of increasing the volume of the reinforcing embankment adjacent to the caisson in terms of the stability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Coastal Engineering Journal
Coastal Engineering Journal 工程技术-工程:大洋
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Coastal Engineering Journal is a peer-reviewed medium for the publication of research achievements and engineering practices in the fields of coastal, harbor and offshore engineering. The CEJ editors welcome original papers and comprehensive reviews on waves and currents, sediment motion and morphodynamics, as well as on structures and facilities. Reports on conceptual developments and predictive methods of environmental processes are also published. Topics also include hard and soft technologies related to coastal zone development, shore protection, and prevention or mitigation of coastal disasters. The journal is intended to cover not only fundamental studies on analytical models, numerical computation and laboratory experiments, but also results of field measurements and case studies of real projects.
期刊最新文献
Analysis of climate change and climate variability impacts on coastal storms induced by extratropical cyclones: a case study of the August 2015 storm in central Chile Millennial and contemporary dynamics of the barrier estuary entrance at Moruya, SE Australia An automatic shoreline extraction method from SAR imagery using DeepLab-v3+ and its versatility Long-term erosion at the north of Hatiya Island in the Lower Meghna Estuary, Bangladesh Performance Evaluation of XBeach for Seawater-Aquifer Interaction Simulation in Swash Zone of Gravel Beach: An Attempt to Reduce the Phase Errors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1