Ciaran M. Considine, Shelby B. Hughes, Jessie Sellers Gibson, David Isaacs, Katherine E McDonell, R. Darby, D. Claassen
{"title":"亨廷顿病的病感失认和记忆编码","authors":"Ciaran M. Considine, Shelby B. Hughes, Jessie Sellers Gibson, David Isaacs, Katherine E McDonell, R. Darby, D. Claassen","doi":"10.1097/WNN.0000000000000293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Anosognosia can manifest as an unawareness of neurobehavioral symptoms in individuals with Huntington disease (HD). Measurement of anosognosia is challenging, but the Anosognosia Scale (AS) represents a brief option with promising findings in small samples. Objective: To replicate application of the AS in a larger HD sample than previous studies in order to assess psychometrics and demographic correlates and to investigate the genetic, motor, and neuropsychological correlates of the AS in individuals with HD. Method: We retrospectively reviewed the AS ratings of 74 genetically confirmed Huntington gene carriers, nearly all early motor manifest, who had been referred for clinical neuropsychological assessment. Concurrent clinical neurologic examination and neuropsychometric assessment data were compiled, where available (ns = 35–74). The severity of the anosognosia per AS ratings was characterized for the HD sample. Results: The AS ratings did not correlate with demographic variables, genetic markers, or motor dysfunction severity. Correlation analyses revealed that higher AS ratings correlated with worse recognition–discrimination memory performance (r = 0.38, P < 0.05) but not cognitive control on executive functioning performance or on collateral-reported frontal–behavioral symptoms. Higher AS ratings also correlated with fewer patient-reported depressive symptoms (r = –0.38, P < 0.01) and diurnal hypersomnia symptoms (r = –0.44, P < 0.01). Conclusion: Anosognosia (per AS) is associated with recognition–discrimination deficits and fewer self-reported neuropsychiatric symptoms in individuals with pre-to-early manifest HD, though not with HD severity per genetic or motor markers, nor to executive dysfunction or collateral-reported frontal–behavioral symptoms.","PeriodicalId":50671,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology","volume":"35 1","pages":"40 - 48"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anosognosia and Memory Encoding in Huntington Disease\",\"authors\":\"Ciaran M. Considine, Shelby B. Hughes, Jessie Sellers Gibson, David Isaacs, Katherine E McDonell, R. Darby, D. Claassen\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/WNN.0000000000000293\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Anosognosia can manifest as an unawareness of neurobehavioral symptoms in individuals with Huntington disease (HD). Measurement of anosognosia is challenging, but the Anosognosia Scale (AS) represents a brief option with promising findings in small samples. Objective: To replicate application of the AS in a larger HD sample than previous studies in order to assess psychometrics and demographic correlates and to investigate the genetic, motor, and neuropsychological correlates of the AS in individuals with HD. Method: We retrospectively reviewed the AS ratings of 74 genetically confirmed Huntington gene carriers, nearly all early motor manifest, who had been referred for clinical neuropsychological assessment. Concurrent clinical neurologic examination and neuropsychometric assessment data were compiled, where available (ns = 35–74). The severity of the anosognosia per AS ratings was characterized for the HD sample. Results: The AS ratings did not correlate with demographic variables, genetic markers, or motor dysfunction severity. Correlation analyses revealed that higher AS ratings correlated with worse recognition–discrimination memory performance (r = 0.38, P < 0.05) but not cognitive control on executive functioning performance or on collateral-reported frontal–behavioral symptoms. Higher AS ratings also correlated with fewer patient-reported depressive symptoms (r = –0.38, P < 0.01) and diurnal hypersomnia symptoms (r = –0.44, P < 0.01). Conclusion: Anosognosia (per AS) is associated with recognition–discrimination deficits and fewer self-reported neuropsychiatric symptoms in individuals with pre-to-early manifest HD, though not with HD severity per genetic or motor markers, nor to executive dysfunction or collateral-reported frontal–behavioral symptoms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"40 - 48\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNN.0000000000000293\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNN.0000000000000293","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Anosognosia and Memory Encoding in Huntington Disease
Background: Anosognosia can manifest as an unawareness of neurobehavioral symptoms in individuals with Huntington disease (HD). Measurement of anosognosia is challenging, but the Anosognosia Scale (AS) represents a brief option with promising findings in small samples. Objective: To replicate application of the AS in a larger HD sample than previous studies in order to assess psychometrics and demographic correlates and to investigate the genetic, motor, and neuropsychological correlates of the AS in individuals with HD. Method: We retrospectively reviewed the AS ratings of 74 genetically confirmed Huntington gene carriers, nearly all early motor manifest, who had been referred for clinical neuropsychological assessment. Concurrent clinical neurologic examination and neuropsychometric assessment data were compiled, where available (ns = 35–74). The severity of the anosognosia per AS ratings was characterized for the HD sample. Results: The AS ratings did not correlate with demographic variables, genetic markers, or motor dysfunction severity. Correlation analyses revealed that higher AS ratings correlated with worse recognition–discrimination memory performance (r = 0.38, P < 0.05) but not cognitive control on executive functioning performance or on collateral-reported frontal–behavioral symptoms. Higher AS ratings also correlated with fewer patient-reported depressive symptoms (r = –0.38, P < 0.01) and diurnal hypersomnia symptoms (r = –0.44, P < 0.01). Conclusion: Anosognosia (per AS) is associated with recognition–discrimination deficits and fewer self-reported neuropsychiatric symptoms in individuals with pre-to-early manifest HD, though not with HD severity per genetic or motor markers, nor to executive dysfunction or collateral-reported frontal–behavioral symptoms.
期刊介绍:
Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology (CBN) is a forum for advances in the neurologic understanding and possible treatment of human disorders that affect thinking, learning, memory, communication, and behavior. As an incubator for innovations in these fields, CBN helps transform theory into practice. The journal serves clinical research, patient care, education, and professional advancement.
The journal welcomes contributions from neurology, cognitive neuroscience, neuropsychology, neuropsychiatry, and other relevant fields. The editors particularly encourage review articles (including reviews of clinical practice), experimental and observational case reports, instructional articles for interested students and professionals in other fields, and innovative articles that do not fit neatly into any category. Also welcome are therapeutic trials and other experimental and observational studies, brief reports, first-person accounts of neurologic experiences, position papers, hypotheses, opinion papers, commentaries, historical perspectives, and book reviews.