目标日期基金的业绩分析

Q4 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Journal of Retirement Pub Date : 2020-10-01 DOI:10.3386/w27971
J. Shoven, D. Walton
{"title":"目标日期基金的业绩分析","authors":"J. Shoven, D. Walton","doi":"10.3386/w27971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents a thorough evaluation of target date funds (TDFs) for the period 2010–2020. TDFs have grown enormously in assets, reaching $1.4 trillion at the end of 2019, and account for approximately 24% of all assets in 401(k) accounts. We report on the results of a style analysis evaluation of TDFs that determines their effective asset allocation. It examines both the constant in the style analysis regressions and resulting Sharpe ratios, which reflect the over- or under-performance of the funds relative to a passive benchmark with the same asset allocation. Lower cost TDFs tend to match the benchmark returns, while higher cost TDFs deviate from them considerably. We examine how TDFs performed in the stock market crash between February 19 and March 23, 2020, during which five-week period broad market averages fell by about one-third. We find that the value of long-dated TDFs (those with a target date of 2045 and beyond) fell by between 30% and 35%, while the 2025 funds, designed for people roughly 60 years old, lost between 20% and 25% of their value. We find that past performance only weakly influences future expected performance. As with equity funds in general in this period, TDFs with actively managed ingredient funds, on average, trailed the performance of their cheaper passively managed counterparts. TOPICS: Pension funds, portfolio theory, risk management, performance measurement Key Findings ▪ Even near term target date funds (TDFs) have considerable equity exposure. For instance, 2025 TDFs lost between 20 and 25% of their value in the five weeks between February 19 and March 23, 2020. Many longer horizon TDFs did no better than pure equity funds in this period. ▪ 75% of actively managed TDFs failed to do as well as the best fitting set of reference ETFs. ▪ Past performance is only a weak predictor of future performance for TDFs. An extra 1% per year return in 2010–14 period only increases the expected return in 2015–19 by 9 basis points per year.","PeriodicalId":36429,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Retirement","volume":"8 1","pages":"43 - 65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Analysis of the Performance of Target Date Funds\",\"authors\":\"J. Shoven, D. Walton\",\"doi\":\"10.3386/w27971\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article presents a thorough evaluation of target date funds (TDFs) for the period 2010–2020. TDFs have grown enormously in assets, reaching $1.4 trillion at the end of 2019, and account for approximately 24% of all assets in 401(k) accounts. We report on the results of a style analysis evaluation of TDFs that determines their effective asset allocation. It examines both the constant in the style analysis regressions and resulting Sharpe ratios, which reflect the over- or under-performance of the funds relative to a passive benchmark with the same asset allocation. Lower cost TDFs tend to match the benchmark returns, while higher cost TDFs deviate from them considerably. We examine how TDFs performed in the stock market crash between February 19 and March 23, 2020, during which five-week period broad market averages fell by about one-third. We find that the value of long-dated TDFs (those with a target date of 2045 and beyond) fell by between 30% and 35%, while the 2025 funds, designed for people roughly 60 years old, lost between 20% and 25% of their value. We find that past performance only weakly influences future expected performance. As with equity funds in general in this period, TDFs with actively managed ingredient funds, on average, trailed the performance of their cheaper passively managed counterparts. TOPICS: Pension funds, portfolio theory, risk management, performance measurement Key Findings ▪ Even near term target date funds (TDFs) have considerable equity exposure. For instance, 2025 TDFs lost between 20 and 25% of their value in the five weeks between February 19 and March 23, 2020. Many longer horizon TDFs did no better than pure equity funds in this period. ▪ 75% of actively managed TDFs failed to do as well as the best fitting set of reference ETFs. ▪ Past performance is only a weak predictor of future performance for TDFs. An extra 1% per year return in 2010–14 period only increases the expected return in 2015–19 by 9 basis points per year.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36429,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Retirement\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"43 - 65\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Retirement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3386/w27971\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Retirement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3386/w27971","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

本文对2010-2020年期间的目标日期基金(tdf)进行了全面评估。tdf的资产规模大幅增长,到2019年底达到1.4万亿美元,约占401(k)账户总资产的24%。我们报告了决定tdf有效资产配置的风格分析评估结果。它检查了风格分析回归中的常数和由此产生的夏普比率,夏普比率反映了基金在相同资产配置下相对于被动基准的表现。成本较低的tdf往往与基准收益相匹配,而成本较高的tdf则与基准收益相差甚远。我们研究了tdf在2020年2月19日至3月23日股市崩盘期间的表现,在这五周期间,大盘平均下跌了约三分之一。我们发现,长期tdf(目标日期为2045年及以后)的价值下跌了30%至35%,而为60岁左右的人设计的2025年基金的价值下跌了20%至25%。我们发现,过去的业绩对未来的预期业绩影响微弱。与这一时期的一般股票基金一样,积极管理成分基金的tdf平均表现落后于价格较低的被动管理基金。主题:养老基金,投资组合理论,风险管理,绩效评估。关键发现▪即使是短期目标日期基金(tdf)也有相当大的股票敞口。例如,2025 tdf在2020年2月19日至3月23日的五周内损失了20%至25%的价值。在此期间,许多长线tdf的表现并不比纯股票型基金好。▪75%的积极管理型etf表现不如一组最佳的参考etf。▪过去的业绩只能很弱地预测tdf的未来业绩。在2010-14年期间,每年额外1%的回报率只会使2015-19年的预期回报率每年增加9个基点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An Analysis of the Performance of Target Date Funds
This article presents a thorough evaluation of target date funds (TDFs) for the period 2010–2020. TDFs have grown enormously in assets, reaching $1.4 trillion at the end of 2019, and account for approximately 24% of all assets in 401(k) accounts. We report on the results of a style analysis evaluation of TDFs that determines their effective asset allocation. It examines both the constant in the style analysis regressions and resulting Sharpe ratios, which reflect the over- or under-performance of the funds relative to a passive benchmark with the same asset allocation. Lower cost TDFs tend to match the benchmark returns, while higher cost TDFs deviate from them considerably. We examine how TDFs performed in the stock market crash between February 19 and March 23, 2020, during which five-week period broad market averages fell by about one-third. We find that the value of long-dated TDFs (those with a target date of 2045 and beyond) fell by between 30% and 35%, while the 2025 funds, designed for people roughly 60 years old, lost between 20% and 25% of their value. We find that past performance only weakly influences future expected performance. As with equity funds in general in this period, TDFs with actively managed ingredient funds, on average, trailed the performance of their cheaper passively managed counterparts. TOPICS: Pension funds, portfolio theory, risk management, performance measurement Key Findings ▪ Even near term target date funds (TDFs) have considerable equity exposure. For instance, 2025 TDFs lost between 20 and 25% of their value in the five weeks between February 19 and March 23, 2020. Many longer horizon TDFs did no better than pure equity funds in this period. ▪ 75% of actively managed TDFs failed to do as well as the best fitting set of reference ETFs. ▪ Past performance is only a weak predictor of future performance for TDFs. An extra 1% per year return in 2010–14 period only increases the expected return in 2015–19 by 9 basis points per year.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Retirement
Journal of Retirement Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Finance
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Investment Restrictions on Pension Participants: A Case Study of Nigeria Editor’s Letter The Role of Annuities in Managing Sequence of Returns Risk Approaching and in Retirement guest commentary Valuation of Financial Decision-Making Retirement Planning, Retirement Insecurity, and Financial Satisfaction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1